Gladiator (2000)

[tvine2000]

Originally Posted by Blu2U

I am watching now, DO NOT BUY THIS !!

I have watched the standard version twice in the past week on my PS3 to get familiar with that quality. I am in the Germania battle scene right now, and I promise you if I had not known about the screen shots, I NOTICED the waxiness and clearly saw the fire balls disappear! then you can actually see the cut up arrows move a few seconds later IN REAL TIME . When I went back to check the fireball, it was gone for 5 FULL FRAMES! So noticeable to the naked eye in real time. If I was not an avid forum reader I would have thought they totally messed up the CGI.

This is a travesty in my opinion. I will also be e mailing Paramount for a refund. I knew I was taking my chances, but did not expect it to be this bad.

On a positive note this is a great Blu-ray for the blind.

I hope I am taking one for the team


I am watching on a 50 inch Sony SXRD

hey man at least your honest.most people that buy it will try to justify the pq by saying its ''not bad as i thought etc''.because they know they got ripped.whats this saying about how a studio cares about blu-ray.

for what its worth i hope you rip paramount a new ass.

[surfdude12]

Originally Posted by HAVOKK

I think theres been so much talk about crappy video that bad now looks good compared to expectations lol..

that's a HUGE point. its always an expectations game. but then again, we're blu-ray nutheads, and this is gladiator

[Blu-Malibu2009]

Originally Posted by king_patrick_7

lol i just went through the mistakes as well... you think they'd figure this stuff out! or have someone watch the movie frame by frame!

The image posted in this thread was blatantly bad. The light was shining directly on the guy in jeans. How did they miss it when doing the editing for the film?!

[ManUtd]

Originally Posted by fuzzynutkila

I have watched bits too and I totally agree, it looks very good and sounds great. I see so much that I didnt before. Could it be better? Everything could be better! What if you die waiting for perfect?

I agree. For me the price is worth it, I've been waiting for this movie in blu. So what if the PQ is not perfect, at least I could enjoy DTS-MA. Now if Paramount releases a better version then I'll get that too. I've double/triple-dipped many times since my DVD days doing it once more for this movie won't hurt a bit.

[Batman1980]

Originally Posted by TTUBatfan2008

The image posted in this thread was blatantly bad. The light was shining directly on the guy in jeans. How did they miss it when doing the editing for the film?!

Yeah I get that whole thing about missing stuff since you're too close to the making of it but thousands of people were involved in the production of this movie, you'd think one of them would've noticed it and said something to have that guy digitally scrubbed out while they were scrubbing everything else!

[tvine2000]

Originally Posted by PoorSignal

OK just watched the first 15 minutes,
there is NO WAY this looks the same as the DVD.. I don't see compression articfacts like on a DVD.

While it's not the best looking BD I own, I don't think it is as bad as people say. I must say the detail could have been better.. as this was a recent vintage movie.

Oh, the sound is great and the music is very clear, it is DTS-HD Master Audio not TrueHD like some site says. It is a few dB quieter than most other DTS HD MA. To me the sound is half the experience.

It is worth $17.99 to me.

how about compareing it to other bd movies

[HAVOKK]

Originally Posted by tvine2000

how about compareing it to other bd movies

it will suddenly look horrible again...

[tvine2000]

Originally Posted by surfdude12

that's a HUGE point. its always an expectations game. but then again, we're blu-ray nutheads, and this is gladiator

then again your right and that is the point.we''re bd nut heads and we do expect a lot.it is suppose to be hd isn't it?imop if you keep buying sub-par bd's like this ones,were just gonna keep seeing this crap cause the studio's will keep putting it out.

hey if there happy with the pq oh well.

[HAVOKK]

Originally Posted by tvine2000

then again your right and that is the point.we''re bd nut heads and we do expect a lot.it is suppose to be hd isn't it?imop if you keep buying sub-par bd's like this ones,were just gonna keep seeing this crap cause the studio's will keep putting it out.

hey if there happy with the pq oh well.

Thats what I tried to explain earlier.. People think that people are jerks for complaining when we are really disciplining the movie studios. I for one am not going to defend a sucky bluray just to be mr nice guy.. sorry.

[Batman1980]

Hey what's that email again? I've changed my mind and I'd like Paramount to get a piece of my mind, I'll even use both of my emails to do it.

[JasonR]

How is the Extended Edition? It is supposed to be better than the theatrical cut.

I will get it regardless, love the movie and the soundtrack should be off the hook.

[Jimbo976]

Originally Posted by JasonR

How is the Extended Edition? It is supposed to be better than the theatrical cut.

I will get it regardless, love the movie and the soundtrack should be off the hook.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=323

[JasonR]

Originally Posted by Jimbo976

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=323

Have you watched both? The Digital Bits says it looks better, and I am curious to hear from some members that have actually taken the time to at least compare a few scenes in motion.

[Jimbo976]

Originally Posted by JasonR

Have you watched both? The Digital Bits says it looks better, and I am curious to hear from some members that have actually taken the time to at least compare a few scenes in motion.

From the link I posted....

Only the newer scenes in the extended cut will have the better PQ.

The extended version contains exactly the same video for the scenes common in both theatrical and extended cuts (which is almost the entire movie other than about 15 minutes). It branches out to the newer video for the scenes exclusive to the extended cut.

[JasonR]

Originally Posted by Jimbo976

From the link I posted....

I just reread The Digital Bits, and it seems you are correct on the seamless branching. Thanks!

[dolphinc]

WOW, Way too much DNR.. Look at this screen shot.

[Deadset]

Originally Posted by dolphinc

WOW, Way too much DNR.. Look at this screen shot.

Armor, weapons, look totally fake. Terrible quality!

[Swearengen]

I do not hope, that this is a trend for Ridley Scott. Hannibal obviously got the same treatment, with an old master. Blade Runner looked great, so what about Alien?

Hannibal review - PQ 5/10

[dolphinc]

Originally Posted by Deads3t

Armor, weapons, look totally fake. Terrible quality!

Yeah, and look at all the DNR they used on Russell Crow. I can't even recognize him.

[Batman1980]

Originally Posted by Deads3t

Armor, weapons, look totally fake. Terrible quality!

Armor and weapons tend to look fake in HD anyway, it's worse when it really stands out though. They over-do the clang of swords hitting to hide the fact that they're wooden or rubber or plastic. Plus you can tell by the way people fling them around, you can't handle real swords like that, not to mention you WOULDN'T.