As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
I Love Lucy: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$40.49
16 hrs ago
Batman 4-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
JFK 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.99
1 hr ago
The Dark Knight Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.99
 
Platoon 4K (Blu-ray)
$18.99
1 hr ago
Weapons 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.95
 
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.00
 
The 40-Year-Old Virgin 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.97
1 hr ago
Platoon 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.99
3 hrs ago
John Wick: Chapter 4 (Blu-ray)
$8.99
3 hrs ago
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
 
One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2015, 07:25 AM   #861
Blu-21 Blu-21 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Blu-21's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
Australia
67
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexBC View Post
Thanks everyone for all the great contributions in this thread, specially James Luckard and jscoggins!

To add some information to this thread, I checked the recently released Sony Brazilian discs for Fury and The Interview and they are also fixed and region A.

I'll check Annie soon, but I think it's also fixed up.

BTW, does anyone else also thinks the original Annie is also affected?
I don't think it's one of the worst offenders, but it looks kinda like Troop Beverly Hills and My Girl.

Actually, I think some other recent Sony catalogs might have it to some degree. Titles iike: The Remains of the Day, The Age Of Innocence, Christine and Ghostbusters 4k.

Ghostbusters 4k
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
(the whole left side of the image is severelly affected)

Annie (1982)

http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich


The Remains of the Day
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich
http://caps-a-holic.com/hd_vergleich...ess=#vergleich

(the DVD also seems affected)
Agreed with the others, but the orignal BD of Ghostbustors was contrast boosted which revealed background information that was not suppose to be seen. It also made the stop-motion garbage mattes unbearable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 07:26 AM   #862
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-21 View Post
Agreed with the others, but the orignal BD of Ghostbustors was contrast boosted which revealed background information that was not suppose to be seen. It also made the stop-motion garbage mattes unbearable.
Yeah, but look at the trees, they're just a black blob in the 4K BD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 10:48 AM   #863
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Oh, great. Now every movie with a bit of crushed shadow detail is faulty. See, I don't mind it when actual problems are brought to light, but the inevitable side effect is that people start seeing the DNR/black crush/latest buzz word everywhere.

I saw Ghostbusters on a 2K DCP and I can assure you the gamma was far more in keeping with the new 4K transfer than the horribly contrasty original Blu-ray. But now it looks like "crap". Whatever.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Bk_Tan (06-12-2015), HD Goofnut (06-12-2015), KMFDMvsEnya (06-12-2015), Naiera (06-12-2015), octagon (06-12-2015), StingingVelvet (06-12-2015), tama (06-12-2015), Tech-UK (06-12-2015), Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 01:18 PM   #864
Naiera Naiera is online now
Blu-ray Prince
 
Naiera's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
Denmark
2
25
Default

There's definitely nothing wrong with the new Ghostbusters transfer. It's about as good as it gets for an eighties movie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 02:15 PM   #865
Bk_Tan Bk_Tan is offline
Power Member
 
Nov 2009
N/A
213
199
12
Default

lol @ Ghostbusters making the list so belatedly.

Might as well throw every Sony film there and start new topics for every release of all the problems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 02:42 PM   #866
chip75 chip75 is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
chip75's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
Wales
304
3100
1783
231
9
Default

Remember that the SONY discs affected don't have crushed-blacks because of poor mastering they have it due to the incorrect RGB level been encoded, it's 16-235 and not 0-255. The crushed-blacks are just a bi-product. If Ghostbusters was affected, it would look like this:

Full 0-255 Blu-ray Top - Limited 16-235 Blu-ray Bottom




Full 0-255 Blu-ray Top - Limited 16-235 Blu-ray Bottom




Full 0-255 Blu-ray Top - Limited 16-235 Blu-ray Bottom




I don't think we need to start seeing the boogeymen in the shadows (or the lack of them) with every other SONY release. If SONY use the same master in two regions and then there's a difference, then red flags should be waved, but comparing two different transfers from two different masters isn't the best way to judge!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
James Luckard (06-12-2015), Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 03:20 PM   #867
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Exactly right chip. The crush in the new GB transfer is the result of new timing, NOT the genuine mastering error seen on Fury, Annie etc.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 03:50 PM   #868
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jscoggins View Post
You're right, Ghostbusters 4K looks like crap.

I never liked the transfer of the stand-alone release, but that was before we really started talking about black crush.

However, I think Sony also released it a second time as a Mi4K BD. Is that one fixed?
Ghostbusters needs to be removed from the OP.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 03:53 PM   #869
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
Oh, great. Now every movie with a bit of crushed shadow detail is faulty. See, I don't mind it when actual problems are brought to light, but the inevitable side effect is that people start seeing the DNR/black crush/latest buzz word everywhere.

I saw Ghostbusters on a 2K DCP and I can assure you the gamma was far more in keeping with the new 4K transfer than the horribly contrasty original Blu-ray. But now it looks like "crap". Whatever.
I've thought it looks like crap since screencaps first appeared.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bk_Tan View Post
Might as well throw every Sony film there and start new topics for every release of all the problems.
It's tempting. I think I own only one or two Sony BDs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 03:55 PM   #870
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jscoggins View Post
I've thought it looks like crap since screencaps first appeared.
The MI4K version of Ghostbusters does not have black crush. The original 2K release and even the most recent DVD had contrast boosting. When you compare them to the MI4 release one would think it has black crush, but of course it does not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:01 PM   #871
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
The MI4K version of Ghostbusters does not have black crush. The original 2K release and even the most recent DVD had contrast boosting. When you compare them to the MI4 release one would think it has black crush, but of course it does not.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:03 PM   #872
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jscoggins View Post
[Show spoiler]
I stand by my last post. You are assuming those details should be seen because we saw them in the original contrast boosted release.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 04:04 PM   #873
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
I stand by my last post. You are assuming those details should be seen because we saw them in the original contrast boosted release.
You guys spewed the same nonsense about Fury.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:05 PM   #874
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jscoggins View Post
You guys spewed the same nonsense about Fury.
Except that the VUDU copy of Ghostbusters looks exactly like the MI4K disc.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:07 PM   #875
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
Except that the VUDU copy of Ghostbusters looks exactly like the MI4K disc.
That just means that VUDU got the same transfer as the BD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:09 PM   #876
Geoff D Geoff D is offline
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Doesn't mean you were intended to see it. The other movies in this thread have been affected by a quantifiable problem, that of a double application of the video level conversion from PC levels, whereas applying the same conversion to Ghostbusters does not result in the same level of crush. That implies that it's a genuine grading decision - the higher gamma helping to hide the seams better in the VFX shots - and as such is simply an aesthetic concern. Lumping it in with the properly affected titles is disingenuous to say the least.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trax-3 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-12-2015, 04:24 PM   #877
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
Doesn't mean you were intended to see it. The other movies in this thread have been affected by a quantifiable problem, that of a double application of the video level conversion from PC levels, whereas applying the same conversion to Ghostbusters does not result in the same level of crush. That implies that it's a genuine grading decision - the higher gamma helping to hide the seams better in the VFX shots - and as such is simply an aesthetic concern. Lumping it in with the properly affected titles is disingenuous to say the least.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:41 PM   #878
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
[Show spoiler]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:47 PM   #879
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is offline
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2371
128
751
1093
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jscoggins View Post
[Show spoiler]
Different film.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 04:49 PM   #880
jscoggins jscoggins is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2014
115
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
Different film.
I was using it to express my feelings, not my thoughts.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 AM.