As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
23 hrs ago
Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.99
2 hrs ago
Weapons (Blu-ray)
$22.95
6 hrs ago
Elio (Blu-ray)
$24.96
40 min ago
Burden of Dreams 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
4 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Samurai Fury 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.96
40 min ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
1 day ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.94
16 hrs ago
Longlegs 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.60
16 hrs ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2012, 04:56 PM   #4101
GaragePoet GaragePoet is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
GaragePoet's Avatar
 
Sep 2011
San Diego
431
1710
168
84
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewFM View Post
It's really bothering me that Christine is probably going to be cancelled because of all this overreaction to what is, ultimately, just a faulty blu-ray.
um, no. stop over-dramatizing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 04:56 PM   #4102
ChristmasFnatic ChristmasFnatic is offline
Power Member
 
ChristmasFnatic's Avatar
 
Jul 2012
165
9
15
Default

If say 1000 people return it, will they re-sell 1000 copies?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 04:56 PM   #4103
slimdude slimdude is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2009
-
-
-
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sancho View Post
Saw it last night. It wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
It's not! Many people are blowing this matter all out of proportion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 04:57 PM   #4104
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

I think there is virtually no chance that Sony goes back to the transfer and changes the color timing, at least for any sort of Twilight Time reissue. What I hope for is an explanation on why the changes were made and whom was involved with that creative decision. People aren't going to like to hear this, but it's very possible Romero himself changed it. Savini was an inexperienced director at the time of this production and Romero himself had a huge influence on the movie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 04:59 PM   #4105
Seymour Seymour is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Seymour's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
3231
360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MifuneFan View Post
I doubt Sony will do anything. We already know the film is a very low priority for Sony by the very fact that they passed it on to TT. I don't see them putting any resources towards fixing this issue, at least no time soon. Perhaps in 3 years, if it ever gets a wide release, we'll see a proper transfer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
My gut tells me Sony will never want to touch this title again. And Twilight Time will think twice about touching any of the horror titles in Sony's catalog. Now they will probably sit in Sony's vault unseen.... foever!
Right. And even in the unlikely event that Sony did provide a new transfer, who's going to foot the bill with producing an additional 3000 blu-rays?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:02 PM   #4106
SilentNight SilentNight is offline
Special Member
 
SilentNight's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
1
1
172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewFM View Post
Well, I think it's your mentality that was at fault. Investment, indeed!
I don't even know what you mean by that. Whatever, I would rather pay $6 for Night of the Living Dead from Echo Bridge with zilch special features and probably not the most crystal clear transfer that is color timed correctly.

Hell, my HDTV rip, while not near as sharp as this Blu-Ray release looks worlds better than the DVD and especially the VHS did. We paid $35 for this, great there is a return policy but most of us actually you know...WANT this title. It's an all around crappy situation.

I paid under $10 for Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, there is an obvious audio synch issue on parts of the movie, it's distracting but the movie was $10, not a biggie to me. $35 is. That's what I used to spend on laserdiscs. Hell, those awesome Arrow UK Blu-Rays cost less than this. We have a right to be upset in my opinion.

And for those who think this is a waste of time how everyone is going round and round on this. Ahem....this is a blu-ray chat board, where people come to discuss this type of thing, even if it's going round and round.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:04 PM   #4107
canneryrowdoc canneryrowdoc is offline
Banned
 
Sep 2011
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sancho View Post
Saw it last night. It wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
I compared the 2 discs for myself last night and I have to say the opposite. It really is noticable and bad. It looks like they threw a day for night filter over the whole thing.

In the dvd version you can clearly make out the great makeup effects on the zombies in and around the house. The blu ray while clearer smudges out a great amount of detail. It's almost like I'm wearing 3d glasses. It's shades darker and the colors are very muted.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:04 PM   #4108
AgentOrange AgentOrange is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jul 2011
382
2619
69
3
10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
Agreed. One does not have to have seen the Blu-ray to know that TT doesn't author the discs themselves, they do not participate in any restoration efforts, and they only deal in what the studios make available to them. TT is only the messenger.
Of course none of that is relevant...at all. If there is a problem Twilight Time has to deal with their own customers. What kind of operation would just blame it's suppliers and say "oops!", not our problem? (not that Twilight Time themselves are taking this stance, but it seems like this is what some "apologists" are trying to say). Ridiculous.

EVEN IF the issue happened on Sony's end, which is highly possible, Twilight Time still comes between the customer and Sony. It is up to Twilight Time to take the lead and correct the situation because it is their name on the line. The top of the case art doesn't say Sony or Columbia pictures, it says TWILIGHT TIME, THE LIMITED EDITION SERIES.

It might take days/weeks (alot of people were demanding satisfaction on Sunday). Maybe behind the scenes Sony will have to compensate Twilight Time for any possible losses. But to a customer, none of that really matters. We are all looking to Twilight Time to take the necessary action.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:06 PM   #4109
Clownunderthebed Clownunderthebed is offline
New Member
 
Clownunderthebed's Avatar
 
Sep 2012
Maryland
Send a message via AIM to Clownunderthebed
Default

Anyone that is crossing their fingers and hoping Tom Savini will swoop in and rescue his first directed feature from having gone blue on blu may want to consider this quote from the book Night Of The Living Dead: Behind The Scenes Of The Most Terrifying Zombie Movie Ever:

"That was the worst experience of my life. Everybody had a different idea, or wanted a favor. I've learned that even if they're your best friends, if it's your vision, then you should stick with it, because nobody stabs you in the back worse than your best friends.... I still have nightmares that I'm on that movie set, directing that movie, and waiting for the sun to come up, so I could just stop shooting and go home."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:06 PM   #4110
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seymour View Post
Right. And even in the unlikely event that Sony did provide a new transfer, who's going to foot the bill with producing an additional 3000 blu-rays?
Yep! As it is, the 3000 number is so that even if they only sell 1,500 copies they'll break even. So redoing 3000 Blu-rays would break the bank. Given the choice of having to foot the bill for a replacement program or just refunding a few hundred discs. The choice is obvious. 1000 people are not going to demand a refund. Espcially when they know they can sell it for a profit. And Sony wouldn't spend a dime on producing more Blu-rays. I believe someone pointed out they probably have an "as is" clause in their contract with TT. A huge company like Sony always protects itself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:07 PM   #4111
popeflick popeflick is offline
Special Member
 
Jan 2010
44
329
44
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentOrange View Post
Of course none of that is relevant...at all. If there is a problem Twilight Time has to deal with their own customers. What kind of operation would just blame it's suppliers and say "oops!", not our problem? (not that Twilight Time themselves are taking this stance, but it seems like this is what some "apologists" are trying to say). Ridiculous.

EVEN IF the issue happened on Sony's end, which is highly possible, Twilight Time still comes between the customer and Sony. It is up to Twilight Time to take the lead and correct the situation because it is their name on the line. The top of the case art doesn't say Sony or Columbia pictures, it says TWILIGHT TIME, THE LIMITED EDITION SERIES.

It might take days/weeks (alot of people were demanding satisfaction on Sunday). Maybe behind the scenes Sony will have to compensate Twilight Time for any possible losses. But to a customer, none of that really matters. We are all looking to Twilight Time to take the necessary action.
What action past a full, unquestioned refund is that? Your post is so full of suppositions I don't know where to start.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:10 PM   #4112
Cortiz Cortiz is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Cortiz's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Out there, past them trees
489
Default

I'm just a casual fan of this film, and I've only seen it a couple of times throughout the years. So I don't know what the movie is suppose to look like colorwise. But "what if" all this time, the DVD color timing was incorrect and this new BD has the correct intended look?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:10 PM   #4113
retablo retablo is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Hollywood
1307
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentNight View Post
I don't even know what you mean by that. Whatever, I would rather pay $6 for Night of the Living Dead from Echo Bridge with zilch special features and probably not the most crystal clear transfer that is color timed correctly.
That's called DVD.

That is, IF the blu-ray is incorrect.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:15 PM   #4114
mzupeman mzupeman is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
mzupeman's Avatar
 
Oct 2009
Upstate New York
385
1669
173
589
7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clownunderthebed View Post
Anyone that is crossing their fingers and hoping Tom Savini will swoop in and rescue his first directed feature from having gone blue on blu may want to consider this quote from the book Night Of The Living Dead: Behind The Scenes Of The Most Terrifying Zombie Movie Ever:

"That was the worst experience of my life. Everybody had a different idea, or wanted a favor. I've learned that even if they're your best friends, if it's your vision, then you should stick with it, because nobody stabs you in the back worse than your best friends.... I still have nightmares that I'm on that movie set, directing that movie, and waiting for the sun to come up, so I could just stop shooting and go home."
Thats says to me he really would fight to see this film done right. One could only hope.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:15 PM   #4115
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentOrange View Post
It might take days/weeks (alot of people were demanding satisfaction on Sunday). Maybe behind the scenes Sony will have to compensate Twilight Time for any possible losses. But to a customer, none of that really matters. We are all looking to Twilight Time to take the necessary action.
To an unreasonable customer, none of that matters. We live in a society of instant gratification. Fast food, high speed interet, 4G smart phones, instant messaging, 75 MPH free ways, etc.

We don't just want a refund. We want our order remade and Super-Sized and a couple of Hot Apple Pies for our trouble. And a certificate for a free meal whenever we want. And we want to talk to the manager. And if he doesn't give it all to us, we're going to talk to corporate. And if Ronald McDonald won't talk to me personally, I'm going to tell all my friends what a horrible experience I had and I have allot of friends who all eat here all the time! And I don't care if Ronald McDonald is a fictional character! Put him on the phone!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:16 PM   #4116
Seymour Seymour is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Seymour's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
3231
360
Default

In the end, a refund is all we're gonna get, I think. We can all pretty much agree that Sony isn't going put any money into this, and TT is certainly not going to blow their entire profit margin to fix it, so that's pretty much it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:16 PM   #4117
Whirlygig Whirlygig is online now
Blu-ray Guru
 
Whirlygig's Avatar
 
Apr 2011
HD-DVD: 352
5
120
3893
658
491
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thephantomcat View Post
Yep! As it is, the 3000 number is so that even if they only sell 1,500 copies they'll break even. So redoing 3000 Blu-rays would break the bank.
Now, statements like this are pointless anyway, but, let's go along with your thread of logic here. If 1500 copies breaks even for them, and they sold all 3000 already, that means they mathematically can afford to make another 3000 free of charge and would ultimately break even. 1500/3000 = 1/2 = 3000/6000. Just sayin'.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:18 PM   #4118
Joshinator1989 Joshinator1989 is offline
Active Member
 
Joshinator1989's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
372
2808
1228
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cortiz View Post
I'm just a casual fan of this film, and I've only seen it a couple of times throughout the years. So I don't know what the movie is suppose to look like colorwise. But "what if" all this time, the DVD color timing was incorrect and this new BD has the correct intended look?
Highly unlikely. I own a copy of the Workprint and even with all the dirt and scratches.. it still shows more color than the Blu-ray.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:19 PM   #4119
thephantomcat thephantomcat is offline
Expert Member
 
thephantomcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2011
445
302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlygig View Post
Now, statements like this are pointless anyway, but, let's go along with your thread of logic here. If 1500 copies breaks even for them, and they sold all 3000 already, that means they mathematically can afford to make another 3000 free of charge and would ultimately break even. 1500/3000 = 1/2 = 3000/6000. Just sayin'.
There is no such thing as breaking even in the business world. It's a waste of time and productivity and would be considered "lost revenue."
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 05:19 PM   #4120
AgentOrange AgentOrange is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Jul 2011
382
2619
69
3
10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seymour View Post
Right. And even in the unlikely event that Sony did provide a new transfer, who's going to foot the bill with producing an additional 3000 blu-rays?
Sony/Twilight time might have to come to some agreement. The logistics of doing a replacement program is probably more of a concern (expense wise) than the actual re-pressing of 3000 replacement discs. It seems like the error is related to some dial or knob that was turned incorrectly, so it literally is something that Sony could probably send Twilight Time a corrected version in a week if they were inclined to do so.

If the issue is clearly on Sony's end, one would hope they would give Twilight Time a little "refund" on the licensing fee in order to help run a replacement program. Obviously a complete wipeout on profits on one of the rare "sellout" titles can be devastating to a company just trying to get it's foot in the door. I just hope all parties do the right thing here.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:42 PM.