|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#28861 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | grahams76 (07-04-2018), RCRochester (07-04-2018) |
![]() |
#28862 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
I arrange my collection by genre (film noir, neo-noir, horror, western, 1980s comedy, etc.), with a few exceptions. The Criterion titles that pretty much defy genre categorization simply go in the “Criterion” section.
My collection has also got to the point where I have sub-genre categorizations. (giallo, Vincent Price horror, Roger Corman, Alfred Hitchcock, blaxploitation, 2000s horror, classic horror, spaghetti western, musical, 1980s action, superhero, James Bond, etc.) There's no feasible way to keep my movies in alphabetical order without driving myself insane, since I add new titles to my collection so frequently. With the genre arrangement, I don't have to worry about shifting stuff around everywhere whenever I buy a few new titles. Last edited by The Great Owl; 07-04-2018 at 08:20 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | 20th Century Boy (07-10-2018), billydillydilly (07-04-2018) |
![]() |
#28863 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I have a relatively small collection (compared to many here) but organise my discs chronologically - by year of release.
It helps me to keep the release dates fresh in my mind and also helps put the movie in historical context, I think. My records I have sorted by genres. Alphabetical order is no kind of order at all as far as I'm concerned. Since this is a TT thread I should thank whoever it was here that recommended "House of Bamboo" during the last sale. What a fantastic movie. Glad I got it before it went OOP! It sits in my shelf, the last 1955 disc, between two other TT titles; "Violent Saturday" and "Moby Dick." |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Dailyan (07-04-2018), krasnoludek (07-04-2018) |
![]() |
#28864 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Alphabetical within genres, chronological within directors/actors, by size for the someone-got-carried-away-with-the-limited-edition-packaging ones.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | 20th Century Boy (07-10-2018) |
![]() |
#28865 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
I only have a couple like this, thankfully. I've got this huge trunk with all of the Puppet Master movies inside of it. I also have this giant Herschell Gordon Lewis set that looks like an economy-size cereal box. I keep both of them on the top rail of my closet where most of my movies are.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28866 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | The Great Owl (07-04-2018) |
![]() |
#28867 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
Mine are arranged by director first and foremost (alphabetical by last name), then by franchise (oldest to newest), then an "original + remake" section (for films I have both versions of), then a TV series section, then a general animation section (arranged by studio/director), then whatever's left is simply in chronological release order, from the 1930's up until 2018.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28868 |
Banned
|
![]()
I'm just gonna passively-aggressively leave this little link here.
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...light=organize |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | billydillydilly (07-04-2018), Dailyan (07-04-2018) |
![]() |
#28869 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
No, but the mods do.
Quote:
Last edited by thatguamguy; 07-04-2018 at 09:17 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28870 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I have a special bookcase for my Criterion titles, which I organize alphabetically. The rest of my movies are organized alphabetically. I have a separate bookcase for TV series, which are (surprise, surprise!) also arranged alphabetically.
I love hearing about how other collectors organize their libraries, but I have always refrained from getting into discussions that include the phrases, "You should ...", "You need to ..." or "I recommend ..." I've always believed that whatever works for each individual is the way for that person to go. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | jayembee (07-06-2018) |
![]() |
#28871 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Aclea (07-04-2018), BagheeraMcGee (07-04-2018), billy pilgrim (07-05-2018), bogeyfan1980 (07-05-2018), Dailyan (07-04-2018), DefLeppard (07-05-2018), jayembee (07-06-2018), moviflicilm (07-05-2018), oildude (07-05-2018), Page14 (07-05-2018), StarDestroyer52 (07-05-2018), The Great Owl (07-05-2018) |
![]() |
#28872 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I have my collection organized in boxes waiting to be shipped out, but ideally I would have one set of shelves for Blu-ray movies, one set of shelves for DVD movies, one set of shelves for television (mostly DVD, just the top shelf for Blus), and those would all be arranged alphabetically (with some house variations, like sequels and prequels get filed under the original, numbers are spelled out and spaces are ignored). But I'd also have a section for directors, with their work arranged chronologically, because that is a major collecting point for me. I can understand arranging by genre, but for me this is the most convenient way to be able to scan the collection to remember if I have a movie or not, without having to remember which label published it or which broad genre I decided was the best fit.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | 20th Century Boy (07-10-2018) |
![]() |
#28873 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Mar 2013
Boulevard of Broken Dreams
|
![]()
One Fox title I'd like to see from TT is THE GIRL IN THE RED VELVET SWING (1955, directed by Richard Fleischer). I think that the old Fox DVD is out of print. The aspect ratio is the original 2:55-1 CinemaScope.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#28875 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Just from judging from what's not in your collection...The Seven-Ups, The Keys of the Kingdom, How to Steal a Million and Where the Sidewalk Ends.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28876 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
So, I'm a big fan of Montgomery Clift and I've never seen Suddenly, Last Summer. I'm curious - do others consider this an essential film on his résumé? Or is it like what Night and the City is for Gene Tierney?
Also, I think I saw somebody lump this together with The Long Hot Summer (which I also haven't seen, so spoiler free discussion, pls ![]() I picked up the latter in the recent sale and will do the same for the Taylor/Clift once I get a chance to pick it up at a good price. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28877 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
The Long Hot Summer is also good, with Paul Newman playing a bit of a scoundrel and Orson Welles as a Big Daddy type character. The rest of the cast is also top-shelf. I would recommend both films, but neither is essential, IMHO. My guess is that both will still be around for the next Fox sale, at a lower price tier. At least, that's my bet. Last edited by belcherman; 07-05-2018 at 05:22 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bwdowiak (07-05-2018) |
![]() |
#28878 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
Nov 2014
|
![]() Quote:
The other is Tennessee Williams-lite, with the sordidness diluted and the melodrama cranked to a feverish pitch. It's okay as a one-time watch but it's frivolous, lightweight stuff. Last edited by SeanJoyce; 07-05-2018 at 05:50 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | bwdowiak (07-05-2018) |
![]() |
#28879 |
Moderator
|
![]() ![]() Suddenly, Last Summer is essential Katharine Hepburn and Elizabeth Taylor. Is it essential Montgomery Clift? I think the more appropriate question to be is there such a thing as non-essential Montgomery Clift? Not in my book. The real star of this deep Southern gothic drama is Hepburn's spoiled, selfish son Sebastian, who except for brief flashbacks, is never actually seen. Yet he dominates the film, the conversations, the setting, and the central mystery of what drove Elizabeth Taylor's character, his cousin Catherine Holly, insane enough to be committed to a series of mental institutions. Sebastian is an enigma who can either redeem or destroy the lives of the main protagonists in this disturbing psychological tale based on the play by Tennessee Williams and adapted to the screen by Gore Vidal. Directed by Joseph Mankiewicz (The Barefoot Contessa, Dragonwyck, The Ghost and Mrs. Muir), the story revolves around a Southern matriarch and widow Violet Venable (played by Katharine Hepburn) who requests the services of a young, brilliant psychiatrist named John Cukrowicz (played by Clift) to review the case of the recent mental breakdown of her niece Catherine Holly. Cukrowicz is a rising celebrity in scientific circles for his pioneering use of lobotomy to cure seemingly incurably violent mentally ill patients. He has been hired out of Chicago by the aging and financially struggling local state mental institute to oversee its new programs and to add prestige to its staff. The carrot dangled by Violet to the institute is a substantial financial gift if Cukrowicz will examine Catherine's as a suitable candidate for lobotomy. And so the story begins, through a series of interviews with Catherine by Cukrowicz in an attempt to unlock the events that drove her insane. Along the way we see Catherine's torment at the hands of some well meaning but clueless nuns who are currently caring for her and are no longer able to control her rages, her transfer to Cukrowicz's institute, and the dramas that erupt there when Catherine comes face-to-face with her aunt Violet, her mother and brother, and the other inmates of a madhouse. Like the layers of an onion, the plot peels back the nature of Catherine's psychosis and the motivations of the central characters. Sebastian rises to the forefront of the story and remains there until the bitter, violent, melodramatic end. By the time the curtain comes down on this cinematic working of William's play, we have been treated (or subjected to, depending on your point of view) to just about the darkest themed and overwrought film in Mankiewicz's impressive career. Drivers to the story include insanity, murder, cruelty, cannibalism, cowardice, and loving something to the extremes of evil in order to protect it. Homosexuality is a central theme; how it is portrayed in the film is subject to both the Hays Code and the view of the times. Suddenly, Last Summer is a film that will not appeal to everyone. Tennessee Williams himself roundly scourged the film, criticizing among other things how it was adapted from his original play and the casting of Taylor as Catherine (he felt Taylor, at this time at the height of her career, as too glamorous and unsuitable for the role). Critics gave it mixed reviews, although in the court of public opinion where things really count, the audience flocked to it and made it a hit. In spite of Williams dire assessment of casting choices, Taylor is magnificent as Catherine. In my opinion, this is one of her finest roles. Hepburn is also tremendous as Violet, a performance both nuanced and over-the-top, so well done that she is instrumental in making the unseen character of Sebastian leap to life on the screen. Both Hepburn and Taylor received Academy award nominations for this film. I would be amiss if I did not also point out the performance of Mercedes McCambridge as Catherine's mother, a role owned by McCambrige, one of my favorite actresses, who brings to the story a particularly pathetic and craven accompaniment to a horror that nevertheless earns her the sympathy of the audience. Taylor and Hepburn leave a little room for Clift. His portrayal of Dr. Cukrowicz is subdued, but so were just about all of Clift's roles at this time and going forward. At this point in his career he was in the grip of pain killers and alcohol as he recovered from the auto accident that changed his life forever. He was unstable, had problems with his lines, and required multiple takes to get his scenes complete. Taylor was instrumental in Clift getting the role at a time when he was considered a liability due to his dependencies; the two of them were great friends, and Clift's accident had happened as he was leaving Taylor's home. From what I have read, director Mankiewicz was totally unsympathetic to the actor's struggles and wanted him replaced. The story goes that Hepburn was so appalled by Mankiewicz's treatment of Clift that, when her final scene was filmed and Mankiewicz confirmed her services were no longer needed, she spat in the director's face. In my mind I equate Clift's performance here on par with his acting in The Misfits. He seems rather stiff and slightly spaced out, a tortured individual struggling to maintain balance, who still carries his roles onscreen with a pathos and humanity few others could equal. He is an essential actor in my opinion. The 4K transfer of Suddenly, Last Summer is beautiful and rich, reflecting how good black and white film can look in high definition. I have no complaints with the video or sound presentation. The movie may be guilty of Southern Gothic excess, but it is a guilty pleasure I most heartily recommend and could watch over and over again. Last edited by oildude; 07-06-2018 at 10:21 PM. Reason: spelling corrections |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | billy pilgrim (07-06-2018), BluBlazes (07-08-2018), Bradsdadg (07-05-2018), bwdowiak (07-05-2018), CRASHLANDING (07-05-2018), geoff (07-07-2018), hoytereden (07-06-2018), jmclick (07-05-2018), Jobla (07-05-2018), krasnoludek (07-06-2018), mja345 (07-05-2018), plateoshrimp (07-05-2018), The Great Owl (07-06-2018), the sordid sentinel (07-06-2018), Widescreenfilmguy (07-06-2018) |
![]() |
#28880 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
if the oildude likes it, I'll probably enjoy it.
![]() this was reaffirmed w/ your comments regarding Ride The Pink Horse in the CC thread. you've got a great appreciation for these smaller gems. we've shared the same enthusiasm on a lot of them. thanks for this write up. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | oildude (07-05-2018), The Great Owl (07-06-2018) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|