As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
1 day ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
11 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
19 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
21 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
11 hrs ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
 
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
7 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2006, 12:33 AM   #1
mainman mainman is offline
Senior Member
 
mainman's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
Default M-peg2 codec on blu-ray

Why does blu-ray use M-peg2 codecs.

HD-DVD is using M-peg2 and M-peg4 codecs.

I had heard that M-peg4 is better than M-peg2.

Is Blu-ray planning in the future to use M-peg4 codecs also?

And what is iHD that HD-DVD is talking about? Is Blu-ray going to use this also?

Thanx
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 12:54 AM   #2
James Morrow James Morrow is offline
Member
 
Jun 2004
Default

Blu-Ray uses MPEG2 because much of the current HD infrastructure is based around it, and because MPEG2 outperforms MPEG4 (and WMV10) on high definition material at higher bitrates (e.g. 1080p24 encoded at 24Mbps). However, like HD-DVD, BD also supports MPEG4.

MPEG4 is better than MPEG2 at low bitrates, but that is primarily because it was designed for low bitrates (such as 1080p24 at less than 10Mbps.) Some of the compromises it makes to achieve such low bitrates lead to artefacts which becomne increasingly obvious on large, high definition screens - such as a 50" 1080p screen, for example. What would be nice would be a codec optimised for 1080p24 material encoded at 24Mbps, but that doesn't currently exist (although both MPEG2 and MPEG4 are being developed all the time).

iHD is a Microsoft driven interactivity/system management software tool, support for which is going to be built in to Vista (the next version of Windows), but BluRay is currently centred around a Java-based alternative.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 01:02 AM   #3
mainman mainman is offline
Senior Member
 
mainman's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Morrow
iHD is a Microsoft driven interactivity/system management software tool, support for which is going to be built in to Vista (the next version of Windows), but BluRay is currently centred around a Java-based alternative.
If I were Sony, I would put the iHD in the Blu-ray as well as the Java-based alternative, just to make everybody happy and gain more support.

And it I think it would be easier to use Blu-ray on windows systems (since that is the standard all over the world).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 02:49 AM   #4
Shadowself Shadowself is offline
Senior Member
 
Shadowself's Avatar
 
Sep 2005
Cool Royalties... it's always about the money

Quote:
Originally Posted by mainman
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Morrow
iHD is a Microsoft driven interactivity/system management software tool, support for which is going to be built in to Vista (the next version of Windows), but BluRay is currently centred around a Java-based alternative.
If I were Sony, I would put the iHD in the Blu-ray as well as the Java-based alternative, just to make everybody happy and gain more support.

And it I think it would be easier to use Blu-ray on windows systems (since that is the standard all over the world).
It is unlikely that Sony (and the rest of the Blu-ray Disk Association) really wants to pay royalties to Microsoft for each player and each disk with iHD on it for the next 10-20 years.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 05:59 AM   #5
Blue Blue is offline
Super Moderator
 
Jan 2005
Melbourne Australia
206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadowself
It is unlikely that Sony (and the rest of the Blu-ray Disk Association) really wants to pay royalties to Microsoft for each player and each disk with iHD on it for the next 10-20 years.
Not to mention the potential conflicts between BRJ ang iHD. With a certain companies track record a patch will be released and woops Java no longer works - in this case it's better one or the other.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2006, 07:43 AM   #6
James Morrow James Morrow is offline
Member
 
Jun 2004
Default

Shirley Knott... ;^>
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Blu-ray Movies by Audio Codec Blu-ray Movies - North America JimPullan 5 02-25-2008 06:21 PM
Blu-ray Movie list by audio codec - Where? Blu-ray Movies - North America JimPullan 8 12-11-2007 07:45 PM
Blu Ray Player on PC Yes the Codec Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software phil 0 08-09-2007 06:17 PM
When is Blu-Ray going to start using the AVC codec. Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology sushi_boy 10 08-31-2006 09:44 PM
what H.264 codec will Blu-ray use? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology thunderhawk 7 04-13-2005 11:47 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 AM.