As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
22 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
7 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
15 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
17 hrs ago
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
3 hrs ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
7 hrs ago
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
13 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America > Wish Lists
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-25-2014, 05:47 AM   #1
BluPat BluPat is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
BluPat's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
Texas
241
1455
80
4
Default Raintree County (1957) Warner Archive Blu-ray 2015?

On the Facebook page for Warner Bros. to release 'Raintree County' on Blu-ray has posted that a friend has told them Warner Archive is restoring and planning a Blu-ray release next year! Hopefully this is true. Wonderful movie with some great Hollywood Legends.

From the Facebook page:

Could it be true? In case you missed it, my friend John Fry just revealed that "Raintree County" is currently being restored and will be released via the Warner Archive on Blu-ray next year!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 05:56 AM   #2
Musicguy Musicguy is offline
Special Member
 
Musicguy's Avatar
 
Mar 2010
640
148
Default

this just a rumor and should be moved to the wish list section
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 08:56 AM   #3
filmmusic filmmusic is offline
Banned
 
Sep 2010
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musicguy View Post
this just a rumor and should be moved to the wish list section
The guy that has the facebook page has talked with the guy that said this and says:

Quote:
I really can't say anything more at this time, except that I have every reason to believe that this is true.
http://www.hometheaterforum.com/topi...blu/?p=4118830

Also that guy John Fry, when asked where did this rumour come from he says at facebook:
Quote:
Not a ramour, a fact.

Yes I realise it's too good to be true, but maybe just maybe....
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 12:49 PM   #4
Oscar Rothman Oscar Rothman is offline
Banned
 
Apr 2012
Hawaii
412
Default

At the moment, all we have is a hearsay from a guy who is not affiliated with the WB and on the top of that - he is reluctant to reveal his sources. Musicguy is right...this belongs in the wishlist.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 01:05 PM   #5
filmmusic filmmusic is offline
Banned
 
Sep 2010
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oscar Rothman View Post
At the moment, all we have is a hearsay from a guy who is not affiliated with the WB and on the top of that - he is reluctant to reveal his sources. Musicguy is right...this belongs in the wishlist.
Ok..
But the thing I meant is, the guy did reveal his sources to the facebook page owner only, and after that the page owner said that it is indeed a legitimate source but he can't say anything further.
That means, as i see it, that it's not just a rumour spread by an obsessed fan or something, but a fact from a WB source maybe..

Last edited by filmmusic; 07-25-2014 at 01:11 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2014, 01:21 PM   #6
MifuneFan MifuneFan is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
MifuneFan's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
New York City
27
1143
69
Default

I can also confirm that this is not a ramour
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
atfree (07-25-2014)
Old 07-25-2014, 01:23 PM   #7
abudgell abudgell is offline
Senior Member
 
abudgell's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Ontario, Canada
22
437
309
42
Default

The "guy" with the Facebook page is me, lol. The collector is a friend of mine who I've been in touch with since starting my Raintree County page trying to gather support for this film to finally be released on Blu-ray. Out of respect for him I only feel comfortable revealing what he's posted publicly on my page, but I can tell you that this is happening. 2015 can't come soon enough for me!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
widegambler2012 (07-25-2014)
Old 08-30-2020, 09:46 PM   #8
captainsolo captainsolo is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
captainsolo's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
155
1268
353
3
19
Default

Makes sense but at the very least they could bring the LD master to dvd which they have for a lot of their preexisting dvd r titles.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
abudgell (08-30-2020), dissolute_dog (08-31-2020)
Old 08-30-2020, 09:57 PM   #9
abudgell abudgell is offline
Senior Member
 
abudgell's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Ontario, Canada
22
437
309
42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by captainsolo View Post
Makes sense but at the very least they could bring the LD master to dvd which they have for a lot of their preexisting dvd r titles.
Yes, and offer it for purchase digitally in HD on iTunes. The fact that Warners hasn't done either gives me some optimism that they might properly restore it in the future.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
dissolute_dog (08-31-2020)
Old 08-31-2020, 10:34 AM   #10
dissolute_dog dissolute_dog is offline
Active Member
 
dissolute_dog's Avatar
 
Oct 2019
Default

Thanks for the info! I just listened to the podcast that abudgell cited, and to add to what abudgell summarized about it (for those who may be interested here), George Feltenstein said that a Warner Archive Blu-ray for "Raintree County" would cost Warner at least 1 million dollars because of their current standards for what it should be:

1) getting the picture for the 65 mm version restored
2) restoring the roadshow elements (entrance music, intermission, and exit music)
3) restoring the 15-20 minutes of footage cut from the movie way back in 1957

And unfortunately, the current materials they have for all those needed elements is not in the right aspect ratio, or the color has completely deteriorated, etc. The money needed to fix all that for Blu-ray -- if it can be done at all -- is too high for Warner's investors, according to Feltenstein.

But like you guys mentioned, that doesn't explain why there isn't at least a DVD of the general-release version they already have on hand. =/

Oh well. Hopefully it will happen someday for "Raintree County". Elsewhere at Warner Bros. recently, the 4-hour director's cut for "Justice League" (2017) is finally happening after many writers on the film industry said that it couldn't ever be done, and that Warner's investors would never approve it, so I'm hoping for more miracles out of WB. xD
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Nicage22 (04-12-2021)
Old 01-08-2021, 06:02 AM   #11
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

Considering that they have the edited 65mm negative, and complete 35mm roadshow prints, why not restore what they have and let us have a look? Here’s what I was thinking:

Disc One: General Release Version
Picture: 2.76:1
Sound: 5.1 (the six-track stereo mix), 1.0 mono (from the theatrical prints)

Disc Two: Roadshow Version (composite of 65mm negative and 35mm prints)
Picture: 2.76:1, with 35mm portions slightly boxed in on the sides (check out The Complete Metropolis, you’ll see what I mean)
Sound: 5.1 (the six-track stereo mix), 1.0 mono (from the theatrical prints)

Disc Three: Special Features

And here’s another business idea: put them on pre-order or something similar, and when they feel like there’s enough people wanting to buy it, they’ll know it’s time to get to work. Before 2052 is here and a public domain copy of Raintree County is just a click away, they’ll amass enough customers to fund the restoration. And considering they’ve found a lot in the MGM and Warner Bros. archives (including elements of Gone With The Wind that we’re supposed to be destroyed), they may very well find some 65mm elements of the roadshow version. ��

Last edited by Shane Rollins; 04-16-2021 at 05:05 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
dissolute_dog (01-10-2021)
Old 04-01-2021, 03:16 PM   #12
yellowcakeuf6 yellowcakeuf6 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
yellowcakeuf6's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
-
-
-
16
Send a message via ICQ to yellowcakeuf6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Rollins View Post
Considering that they have the edited 65mm negative, and complete 35mm roadshow prints, why not restore what they have and let us have a look? Here’s what I was thinking:

Disc One: General Release Version
Picture: 2.89:1
Sound: 5.1 (the six-track stereo mix), 1.0 mono (from the theatrical prints)

Disc Two: Roadshow Version (composite of 65mm negative and 35mm prints)
Picture: 2.89:1, with 35mm portions slightly boxed in on the sides (check out The Complete Metropolis, you’ll see what I mean)
Sound: 5.1 (the six-track stereo mix), 1.0 mono (from the theatrical prints)

Disc Three: Special Features

And here’s another business idea: put them on pre-order or something similar, and when they feel like there’s enough people wanting to buy it, they’ll know it’s time to get to work. Before 2052 is here and a public domain copy of Raintree County is just a click away, they’ll amass enough customers to fund the restoration. And considering they’ve found a lot in the MGM and Warner Bros. archives (including elements of Gone With The Wind that we’re supposed to be destroyed), they may very well find some 65mm elements of the roadshow version. ��
2.89:1?
2.76.1 was the intended ratio with 65/70mm prints, though it was never shown publicly in that format. I've seen a couple indications that the original 35mm reduction exhibition prints were in the wider scope ratio of 2.55:1 (I've also seen 2.6:1 mentioned), though later runs were in the 2.35:1 ratio. 1957 was the last year that the 2.55:1 ratio was used and the 2.35:1 ratio was adopted due to soundtrack issues/changes.
Any new information is always welcome.

Last edited by yellowcakeuf6; 04-01-2021 at 04:48 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2021, 05:07 PM   #13
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

I clearly mixed up MGM Camera 65/Ultra Panavision 70 with Cinerama, that one’s on me. ��*♂️ Raintree County’s original aspect ratio was 2.76:1.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2021, 05:11 PM   #14
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

Here’s an old article pertaining to the 1986 home video release of Raintree County on Beta and VHS. For some reason, it wasn’t released on CED Videodisc or Laserdisc that year. This article is ironically very similar to the discussions that occur on this site. Most importantly, as of 1986, the complete negative existed. Maybe it still does?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-958e34e73992/
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2021, 09:02 PM   #15
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

Per my math and the words of George Feltenstein, here’s the state of Raintree County:

Elements:
-The 70mm negative exists in its edited form.
-The deleted scenes may or may not exist in 70mm form. If so, they’re in a vault in Kansas, and they’ve faded to purple.
-There is at least one 35mm CinemaScope print of the roadshow version, which was struck for a collector and acquired by Turner in 1995. They then combined it with other higher-quality sources, as evidenced by the differing quality of the 1999 VHS. They made two masters, a letterbox 2.35:1 master, and a pan-and-scanned 1.33:1 master. Both masters survive. The print itself is either faded to the point that no color remains or has turned purple.

Cost:
-Restoring the negative would cost $1 million. If this was done, only the general release version would be restored.
-Restoring the CinemaScope print or the video master would cost $1 million. This would restore the longer roadshow version, but it would he in lower quality than the negative would. Also, about 10% of the image would be missing.
-To restore both cuts, and bring both cuts to home video in the best quality possible with the best materials possible, the grand total would be in the range of $2-3 million. At that point, there is no way for WAC or any other MOD label to release Raintree County without taking a serious financial loss.

Assuming Warner Home Video releases it to stores:
-Limited Edition DVD, Limited Edition Blu-ray, Limited Edition 4K-Limited to 100,000 copies each (part of me thinks it should be like Apocalypse Now, part of me thinks it should be a larger set like Gone With The Wind)
-DVD Discs One and Two/Blu-ray Disc One/4K Disc One: Roadshow Version
-DVD Discs Three and Four/Blu-ray Disc Two/4K Disc Two: General Release Version
-DVD Disc Five/Blu-ray Disc Three/4K Disc Three: Special Features
-CD of Score
-Tons of swag

These sets cost peanuts to make when they make them in bulk. A disc-only set can go for $50, at which 60,000 units will break even. A set with all the swag could sell for $100, at which 30,000 would recoup the cost. Knowing how many people would buy this, I predict 50,000 copies sold would put WB in the black, and they would also have the restored transfer to repackage again and again like they have with all their other big catalog titles. (Why do you think The Wild Bunch still has DD?)

Assuming Criterion releases it:

-DVD Discs One and Two/Blu-ray Disc One: Roadshow Version
-DVD Discs Three and Four/Blu-ray Disc Two: General Release Version
-DVD Disc Five/Blu-ray Disc Three: Special Features

At this rate, the package will definitely be a massive case like It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World. The DVD would be at least $30 and the Blu-ray would be at least $40. Considering that CC’s entire business is film restoration, it might not hurt their bottom line to do Raintree County as much as it would to Warner Bros. With CC, if Raintree County doesn’t sell much but their next Ingmar Bergman release sells better than expected, then one hand will wash the other.

It would not shock me in the least if throughout all of the releases of Raintree County on video, the combined releases didn’t move a million units. This really would be a gamble of a release, since it didn’t exactly make waves, and it has become basically a cult film with a bigger aspect ratio. While the number on the package will sell it, it will only be when it gets a normal release that it proceeds to make money, albeit nickel and dine kind of money.

Edit: How do I put a petition together on here? I saw it once before on someone else’s post. Member, admin, mod, anyone? Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
abudgell (05-18-2021), Flash3000 (05-29-2021), SwatDB (10-13-2021), yellowcakeuf6 (05-17-2021)
Old 05-17-2021, 09:59 PM   #16
yellowcakeuf6 yellowcakeuf6 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
yellowcakeuf6's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
-
-
-
16
Send a message via ICQ to yellowcakeuf6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Rollins View Post
Per my math and the words of George Feltenstein, here’s the state of Raintree County:

[Show spoiler]Elements:
-The 70mm negative exists in its edited form.
-The deleted scenes may or may not exist in 70mm form. If so, they’re in a vault in Kansas, and they’ve faded to purple.
-There is at least one 35mm CinemaScope print of the roadshow version, which was struck for a collector and acquired by Turner in 1995. They then combined it with other higher-quality sources, as evidenced by the differing quality of the 1999 VHS. They made two masters, a letterbox 2.35:1 master, and a pan-and-scanned 1.33:1 master. Both masters survive. The print itself is either faded to the point that no color remains or has turned purple.

Cost:
-Restoring the negative would cost $1 million. If this was done, only the general release version would be restored.
-Restoring the CinemaScope print or the video master would cost $1 million. This would restore the longer roadshow version, but it would he in lower quality than the negative would. Also, about 10% of the image would be missing.
-To restore both cuts, and bring both cuts to home video in the best quality possible with the best materials possible, the grand total would be in the range of $2-3 million. At that point, there is no way for WAC or any other MOD label to release Raintree County without taking a serious financial loss.

Assuming Warner Home Video releases it to stores:
-Limited Edition DVD, Limited Edition Blu-ray, Limited Edition 4K-Limited to 100,000 copies each (part of me thinks it should be like Apocalypse Now, part of me thinks it should be a larger set like Gone With The Wind)
-DVD Discs One and Two/Blu-ray Disc One/4K Disc One: Roadshow Version
-DVD Discs Three and Four/Blu-ray Disc Two/4K Disc Two: General Release Version
-DVD Disc Five/Blu-ray Disc Three/4K Disc Three: Special Features
-CD of Score
-Tons of swag

These sets cost peanuts to make when they make them in bulk. A disc-only set can go for $50, at which 60,000 units will break even. A set with all the swag could sell for $100, at which 30,000 would recoup the cost. Knowing how many people would buy this, I predict 50,000 copies sold would put WB in the black, and they would also have the restored transfer to repackage again and again like they have with all their other big catalog titles. (Why do you think The Wild Bunch still has DD?)

Assuming Criterion releases it:

-DVD Discs One and Two/Blu-ray Disc One: Roadshow Version
-DVD Discs Three and Four/Blu-ray Disc Two: General Release Version
-DVD Disc Five/Blu-ray Disc Three: Special Features

At this rate, the package will definitely be a massive case like It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World. The DVD would be at least $30 and the Blu-ray would be at least $40. Considering that CC’s entire business is film restoration, it might not hurt their bottom line to do Raintree County as much as it would to Warner Bros. With CC, if Raintree County doesn’t sell much but their next Ingmar Bergman release sells better than expected, then one hand will wash the other.

It would not shock me in the least if throughout all of the releases of Raintree County on video, the combined releases didn’t move a million units. This really would be a gamble of a release, since it didn’t exactly make waves, and it has become basically a cult film with a bigger aspect ratio. While the number on the package will sell it, it will only be when it gets a normal release that it proceeds to make money, albeit nickel and dine kind of money.

Edit: How do I put a petition together on here? I saw it once before on someone else’s post. Member, admin, mod, anyone? Thanks!


Sounds good to me, but selling 60,000 copies sounds like a very tall order considering the decline of physical media sales.
If they want to try some sort of pre-order/interest/sign up I would be willing to pay upfront whatever they asked, within reason.
The real lure for this title is the roadshow version but having anything in HD is the priority.
This is another film video enthusiasts have been howling for in HD for 15 years!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
abudgell (05-18-2021)
Old 05-18-2021, 04:28 PM   #17
abudgell abudgell is offline
Senior Member
 
abudgell's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Ontario, Canada
22
437
309
42
Default

At this point, I'd be satisfied with a restoration of the 35mm shorter, general release cut of Raintree County. I don't think I've watched the reconstructed roadshow version since the general release cut of the film streamed in HD on FilmStruck back in 2018—the version that TCM has been airing September of the same year. It's missing the overture, entr'acte, etc., but it's by far the best the film has looked for home viewing.

Last edited by abudgell; 05-22-2021 at 11:24 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
yellowcakeuf6 (05-19-2021)
Old 05-22-2021, 11:34 PM   #18
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

I thought of doing it in stages:

Stage One: the big, numbered set. This is the giant set that comes with books, posters, CDs, lithographs, autographs, telegraphs, all the bells and whistles.
If there are individual releases for each of the the three formats, 50,000 each would do it. I’m a completist to the nth degree, so it would be two of each right away, and then I’d probably snatch up more later. The number would easily sell it. These would have to retail for $100 each. Considering that Raintree County is being reevaluated more and more (there are quite a few people who love it, including me), each stage of selling these movies may create word-of-mouth advertising for the next releases. My earlier comment describes my intended layout for this set.
(For an example of what I’m referring to, look at The Wizard Of Oz (2009 and 2013), Gone With The Wind (2009 and 2013), Casablanca (2012), Singin’ In The Rain (2012?), The Ten Commandments (2011), Ben-Hur (2009), The Sound Of Music (2010), and JFK (2013).)

Stage Two: the discs without the swag. All the movie discs, maybe the special features disc and maybe the CD. While these wouldn’t have to be numbered, it would definitely move a lot of collectors’ hands. It would probably be at least $30, no more than $50. If they were numbered, maybe 100,000 or 250,000. Number isn’t necessary, but it sometimes sell things that otherwise wouldn’t sell.
(See the non-swag editions of Gone With The Wind (2009 and 2013), The Wizard Of Oz (2009 and 2013), The Ten Commandments (after 2011), West Side Story (2010-2011), One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest (2012?), and JFK (2013), as well as the 4K releases of 2001: A Space Odyssey and Apocalypse Now.)

Stage Three: The standard release. If I bought three discs plus a DC and some swag for $25 when I got 2001: A Space Odyssey, then there’s no reason why three discs in a case should be more than $30, preferably less. It would just be the general release cut, the roadshow cut, and the special features in a case with maybe a DC.

Considering that no MGM Camera 65/Ultra Panavision 70 movies have hit 4K yet, this would open the door to releasing the rest of them. At least 10% of the buyers would get it to give their TVs a workout since there’s not many *physical film* scope movies on 4K yet either.

There’s no doubt that Raintree County would need a major public reappraisal by us laypeople to become even a possibility for WB. However, the odds of it becoming reappraised the way Greed, Metropolis, Freaks, Citizen Kane, The Magnificent Ambersons, The Godfather Part II, The Rocky Horror Picture Show, and The Shawshank Redemption are a long shot. It didn’t have that spectacular Ed Wood- level *thud* that would make it a bomb and guarantee that its low standing would be legendary. It wasn’t a critical darling and a theatrical disaster. (Ironically, it earned $13 million against a $5 million budget, and though the film was still a loss. It was basically the Cleopatra of the 50s.) It hasn’t been publicly hated, buried by the studio, intentionally destroyed, or been found by millions of fans who loved it decades later. And it never drew favorable comparisons to the Best Picture winner of the year, much like Dog Day Afternoon/One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest and Goodfellas/Dances With Wolves did. It basically just came and slowly faded. Frankly, had it not been for stumbling across a VHS on eBay years ago, I would have never heard of Raintree County.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
yellowcakeuf6 (05-25-2021)
Old 05-25-2021, 01:14 AM   #19
Shane Rollins Shane Rollins is offline
Banned
 
Jun 2020
In James Cameron's Mother's Basement
8
93
Default

This comment was delivered by The Mad Kiwi on the forum for The Wonderful World Of The Brothers Grimm, another widescreen movie stuck in restoration hell. That movie was just restored and is being released on Blu-ray later this year.

“This is such exciting news! I never thought we'd get this since it was always said the elements were in such rough shape that WB didn't think it worth the cost considering what a niche title this is. I'm thrilled to hear the elements are in better shape than expected, and I can tell just by the couple of shots in that article that this is going to look gorgeous. And what a treat to give us both letterbox and SmileBox options!”

Aside from the last sentence, it could easily be a description of the restored Raintree County, and frankly the comment should serve as a motivation to go out and restore the movie. It would be Day One for me.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
yellowcakeuf6 (05-25-2021)
Old 05-25-2021, 01:10 PM   #20
yellowcakeuf6 yellowcakeuf6 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
yellowcakeuf6's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
-
-
-
16
Send a message via ICQ to yellowcakeuf6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane Rollins View Post
This comment was delivered by The Mad Kiwi on the forum for The Wonderful World Of The Brothers Grimm, another widescreen movie stuck in restoration hell. That movie was just restored and is being released on Blu-ray later this year.

“This is such exciting news! I never thought we'd get this since it was always said the elements were in such rough shape that WB didn't think it worth the cost considering what a niche title this is. I'm thrilled to hear the elements are in better shape than expected, and I can tell just by the couple of shots in that article that this is going to look gorgeous. And what a treat to give us both letterbox and SmileBox options!”

Aside from the last sentence, it could easily be a description of the restored Raintree County, and frankly the comment should serve as a motivation to go out and restore the movie. It would be Day One for me.
Though it may have never been shown publicly in its intended aspect ratio (2.76:1), though, if I remember correctly, the L.A. and/or N.Y. Premieres may have shown the 70mm version, I would want that to be included in the video release. Maybe the Roadshow in W I D E 2.76 and 4-track discrete and the cut General Release in 2.35 and original mono(?).
I'd be willing to pay dearly for a nicely done set similar to the very well done Gone With the Wind (70th) and Ben-Hur (UCE) boxed sets.

Last edited by yellowcakeuf6; 05-25-2021 at 01:14 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Shane Rollins (05-29-2021)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America > Wish Lists



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54 PM.