As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
10 hrs ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
9 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
16 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
21 hrs ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-18-2008, 01:06 AM   #1
Headphone Czar Headphone Czar is offline
Active Member
 
May 2008
San Jose, CA
2
Default is 1080p Marketing Hype?

Or does it really provide a big increase in PQ.. I only have 720p/1080i & feel like I'm missing out.. I'm a bit skeptical, with the whole 'full HD', 'true HD', ads that are being pushed to sell 1080p sets.. I'm sure some people think 1080p is a higher resolution then 1080i..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 01:23 AM   #2
My_Two_Cents My_Two_Cents is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
My_Two_Cents's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Wherever I may roam....
40
35
507
19
1
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Headphone Czar View Post
Or does it really provide a big increase in PQ.. I only have 720p/1080i & feel like I'm missing out.. I'm a bit skeptical, with the whole 'full HD', 'true HD', ads that are being pushed to sell 1080p sets.. I'm sure some people think 1080p is a higher resolution then 1080i..
1080p (1920x1080=2,073,600 pixels) is higher resolution than 1080i/768p (1366x768=1,049,088 pixels). As for the question of whether or not it will provide YOU a big increase in PQ, that depends on:

  • Your eyes
  • Screen size
  • Seating distance

I have a 58" 768p plasma, viewing at ~11' and I think the picture is just amazing. Others might have problems with SDE in this setup, but I don't. One thing's for sure, you'll get a lot of opinions on this. The best thing for you would be to go to a store and view different sets for yourself at the distance you will be viewing.

Last edited by My_Two_Cents; 06-18-2008 at 01:26 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 01:27 AM   #3
Edh63 Edh63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Edh63's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Wimberley, TX
Default

I think it's worth it too. I have 1080P viewing at about 12' and it is stunning. You'll only see 1080P on Blu-ray though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 01:30 AM   #4
Headphone Czar Headphone Czar is offline
Active Member
 
May 2008
San Jose, CA
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricshoe View Post
1080p (1920x1080=2,073,600 pixels) is higher resolution than 1080i/768p (1366x768=1,049,088 pixels). As for the question of whether or not it will provide YOU a big increase in PQ, that depends on:

  • Your eyes
  • Screen size
  • Seating distance

I have a 58" 768p plasma, viewing at ~11' and I think the picture is just amazing. Others might have problems with SDE in this setup, but I don't. One thing's for sure, you'll get a lot of opinions on this.
So 1080p is a higher resolution cause of the P. I heard otherwise. 1080i/1080p are the same resolution.. Is 480p a higher resolution then 480i? Thats what the reviewer in my Sound & vision mag said.. & I think a reviewer for benchmark. Not to argue.. I just want a definite awnser.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 01:41 AM   #5
coolmilo coolmilo is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
coolmilo's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Silicon Valley
16
2
2
Default

Basically I = Interlaced and P = Progressive. I scans every other line and P scans every line.

Following is a better explanation: http://www.canopus.com/canopus/techn...interlaced.php
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:47 AM   #6
welwynnick welwynnick is offline
Senior Member
 
Sep 2007
Default

Remember that 1080i is only a transmission and interface format, and (apart from CRTs) is not used as a DISPLAY format, which is the most important criterion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:54 AM   #7
Geofruben Geofruben is offline
Member
 
Jun 2008
1
Default

1080p is only necassary when you get into the 50 plus inch TVs. The bigger the field the bigger the lines will be. Smaller TVs just don't have enough space to show any difference between 1080 and 720. but 420 to 720 is a big difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:57 AM   #8
HDJK HDJK is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
HDJK's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
Switzerland
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by welwynnick View Post
Remember that 1080i is only a transmission and interface format, and (apart from CRTs) is not used as a DISPLAY format, which is the most important criterion.
Exactly. And the rest comes down to only one thing: viewing distance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 09:51 AM   #9
MOONPHASE MOONPHASE is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
MOONPHASE's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
California
8
520
820
18
29
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Headphone Czar View Post
So 1080p is a higher resolution cause of the P. I heard otherwise. 1080i/1080p are the same resolution.. Is 480p a higher resolution then 480i? Thats what the reviewer in my Sound & vision mag said.. & I think a reviewer for benchmark. Not to argue.. I just want a definite awnser.
P is always better then I so yes 480p is better then 480i and 1080i/1080p are not the same resolution. they may look similar but 1080p is slightly better then 1080i
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 02:38 PM   #10
ZackL ZackL is offline
Senior Member
 
ZackL's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Ontario, Canada
Default

1080p is in my opinion somewhat of a marketing hype. Salespeople at Fry's, Best Buy, Future Shop, and even the little electronics stores will tell you that 1080p is the best but neglect to tell you about viewing distances, screen sizes, or that you'll only see the resolution on Blu-ray, HDDVD and PS3.

All the TV manufacturers now have "1080p TruHD stickers on their 1080p televisions, which makes you go "Oh no... I can't buy a 720p TV because I will not have true HD! So in some respect they feed on the fact that it's touted as the best to make that extra $500 on a television. In some cases of course it isn't market hype. 90% of the time a 50'' HDTV will look better in 1080p than 720p. But then a 720p Pioneer Kuro might look better than a 1080p Westinghouse. It's whatever you want. Look at televisions for yourself and decide what YOU think looks best, not what you've been told is best.

Rock on and enjoy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 02:56 PM   #11
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

There is a sticky on one of these forums about this I think.
Either way, 1080i is less than 1080p. This is not marketing hype. I is for Interlaced, P for Progressive, as others have pointed out.
You will NOT see a difference in quality in a still, paused image or screenshot. The image differs in the way it is presented in motion.

Interlaced images will display half the data at a time, like a window blind (hence the word "interlaced"). This is less demanding on the equipment as it is giving you half the information every frame, but it switches between frames so quickly you can not see the difference in a still shot. But with motion it comes out clearly. Interlaced can cause Moire patterns, jagged lines, line twitter, blurred/striped fast moving objects, etc.


Progressive displays the entire image each frame. This is more demanding on equipment, but the benefits are worth it for many consumers. Since actual film is progressive (in that it displays the entire image for every frame), a progressive TV will better mimic the effect of film. It is also free from these other visual artifacts (errors) and just looks better all around.

Interlaced is what TVs use for SD (standard definition), 480i. Enhanced definition TVs (or EDTV) display 480p. There are methods for de-interlacing an interlaced image, but the results are still less than a true progressive scan image.

So there is no way 1080p is a marketing hype. Sure most people won't notice the artifacts and such, but enough of us do. Remember buying a progressive TV will cost more and can only give you a progressive image if you have a progressive source. Otherwise it will either be an interlaced image or a deinterlaced image.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 03:03 PM   #12
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

Screen sizes have NOTHING to do with interlaced and progressive. That is different. Here is a graph on screen sizes and viewing distances.



And here is a calculator for figuring out the optimal size and distance:

http://myhometheater.homestead.com/v...alculator.html


They list progressive on the image because it is the best quality. For interlaced, although distance can effect this as well, it is a side effect of the distance. If you view an interlaced image far away, it is still interleced, just harder to tell. But the image is still 720 or 1080 so you will be missing details if you are too far away.

No hype about interlaced and progressive there either. The viewing distance and size determines the best resolution, not interlacing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 06:24 PM   #13
hagar852 hagar852 is offline
Senior Member
 
hagar852's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
5
107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptGreedle View Post
Screen sizes have NOTHING to do with interlaced and progressive. That is different. Here is a graph on screen sizes and viewing distances.



And here is a calculator for figuring out the optimal size and distance:

http://myhometheater.homestead.com/v...alculator.html


They list progressive on the image because it is the best quality. For interlaced, although distance can effect this as well, it is a side effect of the distance. If you view an interlaced image far away, it is still interleced, just harder to tell. But the image is still 720 or 1080 so you will be missing details if you are too far away.

No hype about interlaced and progressive there either. The viewing distance and size determines the best resolution, not interlacing.
All linear graphs are theoretical, and not experimental values..
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 06:32 PM   #14
dobyblue dobyblue is offline
Super Moderator
 
dobyblue's Avatar
 
Jul 2006
Ontario, Canada
71
55
655
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hagar852 View Post
All linear graphs are theoretical, and not experimental values..
They are rough estimates based on approximately 20/20 vision, so some people will appreciate 1080p further away than that, others may not.

I have 20/25 vision, 15/15 with glasses. I find 1080p very much appreciable over 720p on a 32" LCD at 6ft.

The fact remains that viewing distance and screen size best determine desired resolution, NOT some line around 37" that makes 1080p necessary.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 03:04 PM   #15
statikcat statikcat is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
statikcat's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Washington, DC
67
Send a message via AIM to statikcat Send a message via Yahoo to statikcat
Default

Interlaced is the devil.

If you think 1080i and p are the same resolution try hooking a computer to each. You will be disappointed if you think 1080i is 1920x1080.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 03:07 PM   #16
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

technically it is 1920x1080.

it is not the resolution that changes. And yes, interlaced looks AWEFUL with a computer hooked up. We have that at work in a conference room and I can't stand to use it.

progressive scan and interlaced change the way it is "scanned" onto the screen. So the resolution is the same either way!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 02:11 PM   #17
tvine2000 tvine2000 is offline
Special Member
 
tvine2000's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Connecticut
164
267
50
Send a message via Yahoo to tvine2000
Default

i'll tell what is a rip off,1080p/120hz,why because its the only way you get 1080p/24fps.if you have a 1080p 60hz,no 1080p/24fps.sad because they could have done it with 60hz
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 02:58 PM   #18
dobyblue dobyblue is offline
Super Moderator
 
dobyblue's Avatar
 
Jul 2006
Ontario, Canada
71
55
655
15
Default

As long as the source is 1080p24, you can perfectly reconstruct the 1080p24 from 1080i60.

It's not complex at all, despite how many televisions cock it up....to the tune of over 85% BEFORE you even take into account what the player is doing as it HAS TO completely preserve the 2:3 sequence so that the HDTV doesn't have to re-aquire it, which is also NOT common.

However I do completely agree with Anthony that ppp is the obvious solution and as Joel Silver from ISF stated to me, "life can be good at 1080i out from 1080p content to 1080p displays - but why do all that work??" and that's taking into account that everything else works perfectly.

Last edited by dobyblue; 06-26-2008 at 03:04 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2008, 03:14 PM   #19
welwynnick welwynnick is offline
Senior Member
 
Sep 2007
Default

I have justified my position with explanation and qualification.

At the very least, we are gong to have to disagree on this one. I respect everything else you say, but not this.

regards, Nick
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2008, 04:59 PM   #20
rragland rragland is offline
Senior Member
 
rragland's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Olive Branch, MS.
1
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Headphone Czar View Post
Or does it really provide a big increase in PQ.. I only have 720p/1080i & feel like I'm missing out.. I'm a bit skeptical, with the whole 'full HD', 'true HD', ads that are being pushed to sell 1080p sets.. I'm sure some people think 1080p is a higher resolution then 1080i..
On my Westinghouse LVM-37w1 37" 1080p LCD, the system information displays 1920 x 540, on 1080i broadcasts. So, 1080p is twice as good as 1080i.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Which RPTV to buy for games (lag?) and Movies JVC 1080p, Sony 1080p, Samsung 1080p Home Theater General Discussion Monkey 14 02-20-2012 08:57 PM
What is all the hype about with 3-D? Blu-ray Movies - North America fredreed 193 02-20-2011 12:57 AM
PS3 Firmware 3.0 ? - Don't Believe the Hype PS3 Patron Saint 64 06-28-2009 05:15 AM
Is Blu-Ray Hype? Blu-ray Players and Recorders Blu-Ray Blu-Ray 33 12-28-2008 07:18 PM
What's the deal with Blu-ray, just hype? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Pablo Neruda 25 04-15-2008 08:37 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 PM.