As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
5 hrs ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
7 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
11 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
3 hrs ago
The Beastmaster 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
3 hrs ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2019, 07:02 PM   #1
Canada Canada is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Victoria, BC
17
305
1201
37
42
Default Do 2K DI's matter?

2K DI's don't really matter that much, what is more important is the resolution that the movie is originally shot at.
starts around 9:05

4K DI's aren't be all end all

Last edited by Canada; 02-09-2019 at 07:35 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2019, 07:06 PM   #2
brian9229 brian9229 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
brian9229's Avatar
 
Jun 2012
Vermont / Steelbook™ - 481
411
1553
71
57
12
59
Default

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2019, 07:07 PM   #3
tcripe tcripe is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
tcripe's Avatar
 
Jul 2018
Seattle
Default

Uses T2 as an example hahahahahahhahahahahahaha
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
dlbsyst (02-12-2019)
Old 02-09-2019, 07:25 PM   #4
Canada Canada is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Canada's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Victoria, BC
17
305
1201
37
42
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcripe View Post
Uses T2 as an example hahahahahahhahahahahahaha
Why wouldn't I use it as an example, it a 4K DI doesn't it? There are plenty of 4K DI's that are great.

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2019, 07:25 PM   #5
Dailyan Dailyan is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Dailyan's Avatar
 
Feb 2015
Beyond the Blue Horizon
195
2245
197
58
55
Default

This is gonna be a good one.
[Show spoiler]
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2019, 07:39 PM   #6
StingingVelvet StingingVelvet is online now
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
StingingVelvet's Avatar
 
Jan 2014
Philadelphia, PA
849
2329
111
12
69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada View Post
Why wouldn't I use it as an example, it a 4K DI doesn't it? There are plenty of 4K DI's that are great.
Because it's DNR'd to death and looks terrible.

Anyway, haven't watched the videos yet, maybe later, but 2k DIs benefit less from detail and such yet still benefit a lot from HDR and WCG. I don't really pay much attention to what is 2k or 4k DI-wise. However I do pay special attention to 4k OCN scans of older movies, as those blow my socks off.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
dlbsyst (02-12-2019), eddievanhalen (02-10-2019), fuzzymctiger (02-10-2019)
Old 02-09-2019, 08:19 PM   #7
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Dailyan (02-09-2019), Sky_Captain (02-10-2019)
Old 02-09-2019, 09:48 PM   #8
IcarusBD IcarusBD is offline
Banned
 
Feb 2019
127
Default

Older movies don’t even have DIs, they get re-scanned from OCN in 4K. 2K DIs don’t really matter that much, given that the ups along is pretty good and that HDR is a bigger benefit. Even the resolution the film was shot at doesn’t seem to matter. Colour grading choices, choice of lenses and so on factor more into how the film looks than the resolution.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
sapiendut (02-14-2019)
Old 02-10-2019, 10:57 AM   #9
nick4Knight nick4Knight is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
nick4Knight's Avatar
 
Dec 2013
Perth, Australia
6
386
716
Default

The answer to 2K DI upscales mattering to quality is no. Case/studio/investment depending. The answer to 4K DI being better is no. Not universally.

So basically we are back to square one which is that you take each 4K UHD at face value of the content of the eventual native resolution of it's format and judge that resultant PQ. Not pit where it came from against where some other title came from in comparison.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
sapiendut (02-14-2019)
Old 02-10-2019, 11:14 AM   #10
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Reminds me of Coop's line in Interstellar about needing two measurements to size up your ass but only one to tell him his daughter's future. UHDs are so much more than just a number.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
sapiendut (04-16-2019)
Old 02-10-2019, 11:40 AM   #11
Agent Kay Agent Kay is offline
Banned
 
May 2018
57
57
Default

Spare change....
Cool...
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Geoff D (02-10-2019)
Old 02-10-2019, 01:56 PM   #12
I DO BLU I DO BLU is offline
Special Member
 
I DO BLU's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Default

Does this thread matter?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2019, 03:41 PM   #13
Lee A Stewart Lee A Stewart is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
Lee A Stewart's Avatar
 
Jan 2019
Albuquerque, NM
Default

With the average seating distance being 9 feet, the increase in resolution over HD can't be seen by most people who have a 4KTV and are feeding it 4K content. That is why HDR and WCG were added. So there is a noticeable difference between HD and UHD and is not dependent on seating distance.

Plus . . . the only true 100% 4K DI would come from a movie with zero special effects which are only rendered in 2K. The exception would be an all CGI movie (animation).
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 01:12 AM   #14
eddievanhalen eddievanhalen is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Mar 2008
1
9
Default

The short answer is "it depends". You have Independence Day Resurgence that was shot to 4K and got a 4K DI and looks mediocre to say the least and then there's Prometheus which was shot at 2K (it's a 3D natively shot movie) and is 4 years older than ID Resurgence but with its upscaled 2K DI trounces it, Prometheus and Alient Covenant both got 2K DI's but look outstanding.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 10:16 AM   #15
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lee A Stewart View Post
With the average seating distance being 9 feet, the increase in resolution over HD can't be seen by most people who have a 4KTV and are feeding it 4K content. That is why HDR and WCG were added. So there is a noticeable difference between HD and UHD and is not dependent on seating distance.

Plus . . . the only true 100% 4K DI would come from a movie with zero special effects which are only rendered in 2K. The exception would be an all CGI movie (animation).
4K VFX is rare for movies but not unheard of. Tomorrowland had 4K VFX. Sully had 4K VFX. Even something like American Hustle had 4K VFX.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 12:03 PM   #16
pottu pottu is offline
Member
 
Oct 2016
Default

When bottleneck is not elsewhere in pipeline DI matters.

Would love to see 4k animated feature with clean and not overly blurry estatics, should look amazing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 10:10 PM   #17
EbonDragon EbonDragon is offline
Expert Member
 
EbonDragon's Avatar
 
Apr 2015
182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff D View Post
4K VFX is rare for movies but not unheard of. Tomorrowland had 4K VFX. Sully had 4K VFX. Even something like American Hustle had 4K VFX.
Didn’t The Dark Knight also have 4K VFX for IMAX scenes?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 10:21 PM   #18
Animatic33 Animatic33 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Animatic33's Avatar
 
Sep 2011
Ontario, Canada
567
4190
451
Default

Isn’t it strange that most digital workstations in post + servers are not up to the task of chewing through 4k digital content? I know it takes time for technology to become economical but shouldn’t every post artist be working with software and hardware to maximize GPU rendering?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2019, 10:53 PM   #19
Fendergopher Fendergopher is offline
Expert Member
 
Fendergopher's Avatar
 
Oct 2017
Norway
104
150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Animatic33 View Post
Isn’t it strange that most digital workstations in post + servers are not up to the task of chewing through 4k digital content? I know it takes time for technology to become economical but shouldn’t every post artist be working with software and hardware to maximize GPU rendering?

I might be wrong here but I think most 3D software is still primarily CPU dependent as far as rendering times go, although higher-end rigs are likely using Quadro cards as well to maximize things like viewport performance. I think for most films 4K VFX is mostly a matter of time and money, rather than not having the available tools.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Animatic33 (02-12-2019), Canada (02-12-2019), Geoff D (02-12-2019)
Old 02-12-2019, 07:37 AM   #20
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EbonDragon View Post
Didn’t The Dark Knight also have 4K VFX for IMAX scenes?
I was restricting my lil' list to DI-finished movies but yes, the IMAX stuff in TDK was done up to 8K. Dunkirk's VFX was 6K. Anyone clock the one common denominator, DI or no DI, to all the mentioned movies?
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News

Tags
2k di, digital intermediate


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:26 PM.