|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.96 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Will the same UHD blu ray released today, look a lot better in a few years, when displayed on a TV with full color gamut, and that can display nits close to the 4000 it was mastered in?
Or do you think the UHD content will look roughly the same as today with only minor improvements? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
The closer consumer TVs get to the specs of mastering monitors, the better UHD releases will look in general. Don't think this topic needs its own thread btw.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
Look at a good early BD vs a good modern BD. If those good early BDs were released today they would be considered mediocre. Same goes with every format prior. A decade from now, these early UHD presentations will be thoroughly mediocre in comparison to the newer releases. Just the way it is. Though I feel we are getting to the point where these early releases are just about "good enough".
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Tone-mapping was really my main question. In that if a TV is so powerful it doesn't need to tone map, would the picture look significantly better?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]()
Depends on how good the tone-mapping was, but yes it should look better. However we are probably a looooong way from 4,000nit televisions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
A 4000-nit TV isn't going to blow everybody's socks off because the ever-higher amounts of that luminance are reserved for the very brightest spectral highlights, but then as Velvet says it's all relative. Someone coming from a pitiful portable picnic player will be floored, people who've already been enjoying high-nit performance, less so. But said TV will bring with it more colour volume, greater than P3 gamut coverage (nearer BT.2020 than not), better contrast etc than what we have now, so there will be an overall uptick in picture quality in general on such a display.
But - and I've said this before - I do think that some discs will get reappraised over time, as and when we get such things as a decent tone mapping ability for everyone and/or a TV that's so badass it won't need to map most content. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.ph...&id=1452781186 I'll happily take that over any current TV available right now. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
The nits are but a part of the equation. But a TV that did 8K rez, 4K nits, >P3 colour, and 1 million to one contrast would be one HELL of a specimen. Fingers crossed we get something like a dual-panel LCD to make that a reality, even if it doesn't reach that bright in practice I'd still take 2K+ nits plus everything else mentioned and proper internal dynamic HDR10 mapping as well as DV and HDR10+. So it only needs to be the perfect TV then to make me consider upgrading the ZD9, no pressure
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | gkolb (02-13-2019), nick4Knight (02-13-2019) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|