As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Alfred Hitchcock: The Ultimate Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$124.99
4 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
1 day ago
How to Train Your Dragon 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.95
4 hrs ago
Karate Kid: Legends 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.97
7 hrs ago
The Rage: Carrie 2 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.99
4 hrs ago
A Confucian Confusion / Mahjong: Two Films by Edward Yang (Blu-ray)
$36.69
2 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.99
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
American Pie 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.79
1 hr ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-21-2007, 08:15 PM   #121
waynrl waynrl is offline
New Member
 
Aug 2007
Default Ya Ya

I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public. Let the public decide which player is the best suited for their needs. Now that Paramount has made a decision Blu-Ray supporters want to cry foul. It's ok when the decision is in your favor? I own both formats and say they are both excellent technologies. I blame the studios for this mess. Make these films available to all formats and let the public decide what player they want. Does it really matter what player is used as long as we get to see the films we want? If the HD DVD is more affordable for a segment of our population then all films should be available on that format as well. I'ts all so childish. The only loser is the consumer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:22 PM   #122
elwaylite elwaylite is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
elwaylite's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Default

Man, all the Paramount deal really did was impregnate many troll women and create troll offspring.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:25 PM   #123
waynrl waynrl is offline
New Member
 
Aug 2007
Default

I didn't see any Blu-Ray owners complaining about the Blu-Ray only releases. This technology needs to be a available to everyone. Sony Prices are too high for people of certain incomes. A player for $200.00 should be available if for no other reason to keep Sony from dominating the market. Movies are art and need to be available to all. The problem is that Sony played its own form of hard ball from the start. If you think Sony is in this for anything other than the biggest possible profits then you are sadly mistaken. This is a mess on everyones part except the consumer. Enough finger pointing. Time to make the technology affordable to everyone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:26 PM   #124
Pilam69 Pilam69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Pilam69's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
126
Cool This is the second time you have posted this drivel

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public. Let the public decide which player is the best suited for their needs. Now that Paramount has made a decision Blu-Ray supporters want to cry foul. It's ok when the decision is in your favor? I own both formats and say they are both excellent technologies. I blame the studios for this mess. Make these films available to all formats and let the public decide what player they want. Does it really matter what player is used as long as we get to see the films we want? If the HD DVD is more affordable for a segment of our population then all films should be available on that format as well. I'ts all so childish. The only loser is the consumer.
It's still not valid. Go back to your HD-Blah site. Blu-Ray didn't PAY anyone to be exclusive. Paramount and Dreamworks got PAID and for a struggling studio they needed the money and I get that. But to pretend that this is good for the consumer is just stupid. The only people losing here are consumers. The consumers are choosing Blu and that choice was just taken away from them by deep pockets.

Troll go home.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:28 PM   #125
blujacket blujacket is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
blujacket's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Dayton,Ohio
70
658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public. Let the public decide which player is the best suited for their needs. Now that Paramount has made a decision Blu-Ray supporters want to cry foul. It's ok when the decision is in your favor? I own both formats and say they are both excellent technologies. I blame the studios for this mess. Make these films available to all formats and let the public decide what player they want. Does it really matter what player is used as long as we get to see the films we want? If the HD DVD is more affordable for a segment of our population then all films should be available on that format as well. I'ts all so childish. The only loser is the consumer.
What about Universal? Its Fox and Disneys fault? Go back to av$ troll.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:31 PM   #126
Pilam69 Pilam69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Pilam69's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
126
Cool Are you serious?

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I didn't see any Blu-Ray owners complaining about the Blu-Ray only releases. This technology needs to be a available to everyone. Sony Prices are too high for people of certain incomes. A player for $200.00 should be available if for no other reason to keep Sony from dominating the market. Movies are art and need to be available to all. The problem is that Sony played its own form of hard ball from the start. If you think Sony is in this for anything other than the biggest possible profits then you are sadly mistaken. This is a mess on everyones part except the consumer. Enough finger pointing. Time to make the technology affordable to everyone.
Fine, you can have my playstation 3 for $50 if I can have your Ferrari for $100. What? You don't have a Ferrari? Why not? They should be available to everyone too according to your logic. Communism FAILED for a reason.

If you can afford an HDTV then you can afford a Blu-Ray player, your argument is worthless. Even if you couldn't afford it your argument is still worthless because we don't live in a world where everyone gets what they want for free. Go make me some hemp shoes or something.

Why would Blu-Ray owners complain about Blu-Ray only releases? Clown.

TROLL GO HOME.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:31 PM   #127
gazzared_typer gazzared_typer is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Not close enough to Old Trafford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by owa View Post
There is another thread on it where the admin relays a message from him. It says something like he just thinks people should be able to see his movie on whatever format they're using.




http://www.shootfortheedit.com/forum...pic.php?t=2300

and to a certain extent this one: Although the admin is speaking for him again (and is wrong about BD25 vs BD50).

http://www.shootfortheedit.com/forum...pic.php?t=2302
I actually think he came across as a bit of a wimp. He then thought, I need to be treated with respect wherever I make my next film. I've got to be taken seriously. Oops slight over-reaction there.

Gazza
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:32 PM   #128
MatrixS2000 MatrixS2000 is offline
Power Member
 
MatrixS2000's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Toronto, Canada
48
305
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
Time to make the technology affordable to everyone.
This is the weakest argument out there on the HD DVD side!

The player is the cheapest part of the entire HD experience! A full HD home theater will dwarf the cost of a Hi Def player. Add to this the fact that HD DVDs cost more, the savings of an HD DVD player are quickly wiped out as your library grows....

Time to educate people about technology and why certain aspects are more important than others....
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:33 PM   #129
gazzared_typer gazzared_typer is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Not close enough to Old Trafford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilam69 View Post
Fine, you can have my playstation 3 for $50 if I can have your Ferrari for $100. What? You don't have a Ferrari? Why not? They should be available to everyone too according to your logic. Communism FAILED for a reason.

If you can afford an HDTV then you can afford a Blu-Ray player, your argument is worthless. Even if you couldn't afford it your argument is still worthless because we don't live in a world where everyone gets what they want for free. Go make me some hemp shoes or something.

Why would Blu-Ray owners complain about Blu-Ray only releases? Clown.

TROLL GO HOME.
Good one. If you can afford an HDTV, you can afford to be neutral.

Gazza
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:34 PM   #130
gazzared_typer gazzared_typer is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Not close enough to Old Trafford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Mack View Post
Whether Bay is an amazing director or not artistically is beside the point, He is a VERY successful filmmaker. He just helped made Paramount a BOATLOAD of $ with "Transformers" and now Paramount is basically cutting a deal and then taking $ out of his pocket. He gets a percentage of HD sales. Now, Paramount has basically taken 2/3 of that $ away, WHILE making a bunch of $ for themselves.
Wouldn't you be pissed..?!?!?

That just makes him sound greedy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:35 PM   #131
BigB88 BigB88 is offline
Active Member
 
BigB88's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I didn't see any Blu-Ray owners complaining about the Blu-Ray only releases. This technology needs to be a available to everyone. Sony Prices are too high for people of certain incomes. A player for $200.00 should be available if for no other reason to keep Sony from dominating the market. Movies are art and need to be available to all. The problem is that Sony played its own form of hard ball from the start. If you think Sony is in this for anything other than the biggest possible profits then you are sadly mistaken. This is a mess on everyones part except the consumer. Enough finger pointing. Time to make the technology affordable to everyone.
Oh come on, grow up. Every Company worth their salt is out for maximized profits - its called Capatalism! I think its fine if Sony and Toshiba slug it out like little children, which this war has seemed to foster. What I don't appreciate is third-party's coming in with their own Corporate bribery machines and scewing around with an area they no little to nothing about. M$ should keep their Corporate wallet out of this format "disagreement" and let market forces drive. The problem is, M$ seems to be just as childish as Toshiba and Sony when it comes to HD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:35 PM   #132
BigB88 BigB88 is offline
Active Member
 
BigB88's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzared_typer View Post
Good one. If you can afford an HDTV, you can afford to be neutral.

Gazza
Neutrality = stupidity
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:36 PM   #133
MatrixS2000 MatrixS2000 is offline
Power Member
 
MatrixS2000's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Toronto, Canada
48
305
6
Default

LOL - so just because a person CAN afford to be neutral they should???

Uuuummm, no.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:36 PM   #134
MatrixS2000 MatrixS2000 is offline
Power Member
 
MatrixS2000's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Toronto, Canada
48
305
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzared_typer View Post
That just makes him sound greedy.
Right...you work for free.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:38 PM   #135
Colorado Blu Skies Colorado Blu Skies is offline
Senior Member
 
Colorado Blu Skies's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public. Let the public decide which player is the best suited for their needs. Now that Paramount has made a decision Blu-Ray supporters want to cry foul. It's ok when the decision is in your favor? I own both formats and say they are both excellent technologies. I blame the studios for this mess. Make these films available to all formats and let the public decide what player they want. Does it really matter what player is used as long as we get to see the films we want? If the HD DVD is more affordable for a segment of our population then all films should be available on that format as well. I'ts all so childish. The only loser is the consumer.
Can you please post this in a few more threads?

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:40 PM   #136
MrBogey MrBogey is offline
Expert Member
 
Jan 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public.
HD DVD doesn't offer any incentive over Blu-ray. Blu-ray offers incentives in the format that Fox and Disney require. There is NO reason for Paramount not to release on Blu-ray. There is good reason for Fox not to release on HD DVD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:43 PM   #137
goodstuff goodstuff is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
goodstuff's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
509
6535
85
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynrl View Post
I suppose it was not a problem to have movies released for Blu-ray only? I say Disney and Fox started this nonsense with Blu-Ray only releases. All films should be released on all formats so that everything is available to the public. Let the public decide which player is the best suited for their needs. Now that Paramount has made a decision Blu-Ray supporters want to cry foul. It's ok when the decision is in your favor? I own both formats and say they are both excellent technologies. I blame the studios for this mess. Make these films available to all formats and let the public decide what player they want. Does it really matter what player is used as long as we get to see the films we want? If the HD DVD is more affordable for a segment of our population then all films should be available on that format as well. I'ts all so childish. The only loser is the consumer.
Hmm...I seem to remember that HD-DVD came out a few months before Blu-Ray, yet I see no Universal Blu-ray discs?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:44 PM   #138
Pilam69 Pilam69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Pilam69's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
126
Cool I have no problem with neutrality, Blu is winning

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzared_typer View Post
Good one. If you can afford an HDTV, you can afford to be neutral.

Gazza
Neutral is good. It's when you PAY a studio to be unprofitable that you have crossed into idiocy. Why would HD-Blah have a problem with Paramount being neutral unless they could see how much the next few releases were going to hurt them when compared side by side. HD-Blah is SO desparate for a win that they will pay $150 million for it. Blu, on the other hand, just quietly goes on being the best product and winning week after week.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:47 PM   #139
gazzared_typer gazzared_typer is offline
Member
 
Aug 2007
Not close enough to Old Trafford
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigB88 View Post
Neutrality = stupidity
Well at least my nose is still attached to my face

Gazza
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2007, 08:50 PM   #140
Pilam69 Pilam69 is offline
Senior Member
 
Pilam69's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
126
Cool huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzared_typer View Post
Well at least my nose is still attached to my face

Gazza
That makes no sense. WHO are you saying cut off their nose to spite their face? I get the reference but not who you are referring to. Blu-Ray for selling more discs? What?
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Michael Bay... Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology zipbags 11 02-26-2008 04:01 PM
Bay speaks of BD's victory Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology webmaster@michaelbay 80 02-16-2008 03:37 AM
More from Michael Bay Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology bluflu 152 01-14-2008 02:35 AM
...And Michael Bay was right. Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology webmaster@michaelbay 89 12-21-2007 06:11 PM
Paramount CTO Speaks Out On Switch to HD DVD Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology HDTV1080P 18 08-22-2007 11:43 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06 PM.