As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Happy Gilmore 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
2 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Shane 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
4 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
 
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.73
14 hrs ago
Airport '77 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
2 hrs ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-10-2017, 02:07 AM   #15
mar3o mar3o is offline
Banned
 
Dec 2011
1
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
I really doubt that is the case, no offense. It's a processing mode on top of the normal image, by it's very definition. I looked your set up on Rtings and it lacks the nits and color volume to really display HDR 10 properly, which is why you want that extra contrast and brightness. Simple as that really. That's why so many want Dolby Vision's dynamic metadata, so that kind of thing will be less of an issue.

Please don't take this offensively, I know people can be sensitive about their setups. I'm just trying to give the blunt advice I wish I got when I had my older TV, which was very similar.
I know my set is not premium. I've said that many times. It's a killer set for the price I paid, considering it includes outstanding passive 3D as well as fairly decent HDR and a crisp 4k image, along with the best OS available for a TV. But I certainly admit it has some weaknesses, mainly the obvious limited HDR due to the low nits, combined with very limited local dimming that has some obvious visual drawbacks, along with some annoying vertical banding (dirty screen effect). It still produces a gorgeous image when it's at its best.

Rtings, as I have mentioned before, gets their facts wrong at times. I have exchanged emails myself with them over this set, pointing out both positives and negatives that he didn't mention about the model.

No offense, but since you have not had any experience with these models regarding this development with HDR, I don't feel you are in a position to comment on this without having tried it for yourself. I have said many times that I never use dynamic contrast for obvious reasons, so that should give you a bit of faith in what I have said. I would not be using it if it was having a negative effect on the image. I always run my set with all "enhancements" off. In this case however, LG has confused things by tying their HDR modes directly to dynamic contrast. There's a reason it is being discussed on multiple sites and forums.
  Reply With Quote
 
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Ultra HD Players, Hardware and News



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:46 PM.