Quentin Tarantino is developing a Star Trek movie

[s2mikey]

Originally Posted by Markgway

Why is there an assumption that an R-rating will make Star Trek better?

It's not like fans have been suffering through decades of PG crap waiting for the real deal.

My collection is full of R-rated movies, but I've never watched a family-friendly franchise and thought 'you know, this would be better with blood spurts and f-words'.

If Tarantino wants to make a space adventure in which every other word begins with 'f' or 'n' go right ahead... but why does it have to be Star Trek?

Why does society always want to take something (relatively) innocent and dirty it up a bit (or as in this case a lot)?

Perfectly said. What is the tangible benefit of an R rating? So Hackatino can add gratuitous violence, f-bombs and nudity?

What the !@#$ for? Its a Star Trek movie. Just stick to the basic formula that has worked since like 1965? Why? Why? Why?