|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $17.49 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $13.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Jan 2007
Boston, Massachusetts
|
![]()
Is this person right, and should I avoid buying a stand-alone unit? Someone wrote this on another forum:
Sony announced that the PS3 will be Blu Ray 2.0 Profile compliant with the next major upgrade. This just furthers my position that the PS3 is the only decent blu-ray player for the price. Just to keep this current for any potential suckers thinking of buying a stand-alone player: The Sony, Samsung, and Sharp Blu-Ray players have painfully slow boot up times and are not even Profile 1.1 compliant. The time before you can actually watch a disk is at least 2 minutes from my experience. My brother purchased the Sony and I convinced him to take it back after he turned it on and then died of old age waiting it to be ready to play. Apparently any "java" enabled disc is significantly worse with them, but we didn't have one to test. We went back, spent about an hour playing with the other $400 players and they were all highly deficient compared to the PS3. The PS3 on the other hand was ready in under a minute, and even throwing aside the games available for it, it is a fully featured media center and will very soon be the only Blu-Ray 2.0 profile player that doesn't require a mortgage. The Panasonic was good, but it was $100 more than the PS3, out of stock, and did not have any of the multimedia features of the PS3. The entire point I'm making here is that stand-alone blu-ray players are a complete rip-off at this time, and only a complete moron would pay $400 for a blu-ray player that's SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE than the playstation 3 for the same price. If you want a blu-ray player for under $500, get a PS3 or wait. Those are the only two reasonable options. Don't be a dipshit who buys a blu ray 1.0 profile player that takes 3 minutes to boot when you could have gotten a PS3 for the SAME PRICE and had a 2.0 player that takes < 1 minute to play a movie, can play great video games, and servers as a media center. I don't care how much DVD players used to cost, or laserdisc. I'm talking about blu-ray players as they currently exist. Unless you want to spend over $500 on a player, get a PS3 or nothing. Anything else marks you as a grade A sucker. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
The Ugly Truth | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Batman1980 | 19 | 11-26-2010 10:48 AM |
Truth or Consequences, N.M. for $4 | Canadian Deals | robertthunder | 1 | 04-19-2009 01:07 PM |
Truth or False? | Speakers | raw nerve | 16 | 02-07-2009 12:47 AM |
I Discovered The Truth! | General Chat | JimShaw | 10 | 10-01-2008 12:51 PM |
|
|