|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $67.11 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $35.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.79 1 hr ago
| ![]() $49.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $31.32 1 day ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $14.37 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
There are many consumer that still are not computer savy to begoin with that want a hard formated disk. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Nov 2007
Reality
|
![]()
If by "win" you mean have one format I assume?
I think if warner plays it well and we would hope they would all they need to do in my opinion is pick the format they like for whatever reason (and they are probably going to be different than mine and yours) and just put all their top titles out on the decide format and try to throw a knockout punch. I think the chances would be pretty good. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
The real technological problem lies in the lack of available bandwidth for delivery but with consumers abandoning higher quality audio formats in droves in favor of lower quality online delivery there will be a great deal of pressure to factor this "likely" consumer preference into any decisions. You'll never lose money by underestimating the lack of insight of marketing departments. Heck, I watched a multi-billion dollar corporate bankruptcy from the inside that flowed directly from the marketing department's decision to spend 95% of their time pursuing glamor markets while all but ignoring viable but less glamorous meat-and-potatoes markets that would have built a nice foundation for the business. The killer point regarding online delivery is that each delivery would have a shelf-life since it's virtually a lock that duplication will not be allowed. Thus, once the consumer's HDD is full, they'll have to dump old content in order to secure new which guarantees multiple deliveries of some titles over time. Those sorts of recurring revenue streams are *very* attractive to businesses. But that's all moot if the consumer decides they want a next-gen optical format which remains to be seen at this point. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Gaming Moderator
|
![]()
I completely agree. There is a lot of denial about the fact that revenues and profits are the driving factor behind the format that "wins". Quality means little. Network television, fast food, US airline companies, insurance companies, etc. are all evidence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
What I struggle with conceptually is the fact that any sort of online delivery is going to look at lot like PPV + TiVo which is already available to pretty much anyone who wants it. Sure having a huge back catalog will increase sales around the margins but by the time M$ rolls out whatever online scheme they're hatching it's likely the market will have bypassed them. If it hasn't already done so.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
CORPORATE GREED.....and the consumer. | General Chat | mr.hidef | 21 | 09-06-2008 01:04 AM |
The Consumer they call us! | Blu-ray Movies - North America | burlysod | 4 | 04-01-2008 10:50 PM |
Consumer ignorance | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | ground chuck | 10 | 10-16-2007 11:12 PM |
A Typical HD Consumer ? | Blu-ray Movies - North America | BluMonkey | 1 | 03-24-2007 10:37 AM |
consumer electronics | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | john_1958 | 0 | 05-07-2005 03:58 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|