As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
22 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
7 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
15 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
17 hrs ago
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
3 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
13 hrs ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
7 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Players and Recorders


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2008, 01:19 AM   #1
Hep Hep is offline
Power Member
 
Hep's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Ontario, Canada
33
660
7
17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Edh63 View Post
How could anyone give you an educated answer on this? That's a personal choice.
I would have to respectfully disagree with this statement. There is such thing as an educated answer for this question. It's a simple matter weighing probability and cost.

To illustrate this point assume the cost of the coverage is equal to the price of purchasing a new unit. In this case it obviously makes no sense to purchase the extra coverage.

On the other extreme, if the coverage was free, it would be a no brainer. Everything in between is a matter of probability of failure, and cost of coverage. While I freely admit I don't have all the data to give you the answer, there is a logical thought process you may want to consider:

Just like gambling, the odds always favour the house. This means that manufacturers/retailers (who have access to the appropriate numbers) always set the cost for the coverage above the probability of failure costs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsteinhauer View Post
Consumer Reports says no almost universally!
The one exception is projection displays.
Consumer Reports does this independently, and has found this to be true as well (I would suggest the manufacturers underestimated the failure rates of projection displays, leading to the exception).

Using this logic, if you live your life with numerous products, and never take the coverage, you should be ahead. If you decide to take the coverage, over a lifetime, odds are you will pay more.

If this gives you no peace of mind, then by all means give them more money.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 02:54 AM   #2
Edh63 Edh63 is offline
Senior Member
 
Edh63's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Wimberley, TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hep View Post
I would have to respectfully disagree with this statement. There is such thing as an educated answer for this question. It's a simple matter weighing probability and cost.

To illustrate this point assume the cost of the coverage is equal to the price of purchasing a new unit. In this case it obviously makes no sense to purchase the extra coverage.

On the other extreme, if the coverage was free, it would be a no brainer. Everything in between is a matter of probability of failure, and cost of coverage. While I freely admit I don't have all the data to give you the answer, there is a logical thought process you may want to consider:

Just like gambling, the odds always favour the house. This means that manufacturers/retailers (who have access to the appropriate numbers) always set the cost for the coverage above the probability of failure costs.



Consumer Reports does this independently, and has found this to be true as well (I would suggest the manufacturers underestimated the failure rates of projection displays, leading to the exception).

Using this logic, if you live your life with numerous products, and never take the coverage, you should be ahead. If you decide to take the coverage, over a lifetime, odds are you will pay more.

If this gives you no peace of mind, then by all means give them more money.
Ok, Spock.

Last edited by Edh63; 06-14-2008 at 02:58 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 02:15 PM   #3
STARKILLER--1138 STARKILLER--1138 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Jan 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hep View Post
If this gives you no peace of mind, then by all means give them more money.
Couldn't agree more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 04:12 PM   #4
jsteinhauer jsteinhauer is offline
Gaming Moderator
 
jsteinhauer's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
120
66
Default

In summary, if you never buy an extended warranty, once in a long while you will have a failure resulting in an expensive repair/replacement. However, you probably save more money by not buying warranties to more than cover the cost of occasional repairs. I've never bought one, myself, and I've never needed one. If a product is a lemon, problems typically crop up earlier rather than later (within the standard warranty period).
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 05:46 PM   #5
BStecke BStecke is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
BStecke's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
182
567
1
1
1
1
6
Default

Another advantage of the Best Buy replacement plan is that if a new version of the system comes out and you have a "problem" with yours, you can upgrade for the difference, or get the new one for free. Case in point, if I had a "problem" with my 80gb, I could swap it for the Metal Gear bundle at no additional cost. So . . . I'm sure over two years you could get your money's worth somewhere
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 06:05 PM   #6
Driver_King Driver_King is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Driver_King's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Tampa Bay, Florida
96
28
10
Default

You should get a warantee from these guys.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2008, 06:30 PM   #7
bhampton bhampton is offline
Blu-ray Count
 
bhampton's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
981
2537
67
6
18
Default

Hi,

I bought the 2 year extended warranty at WalMart when I bought my PS3 in 06. Since it starts after the Sony warranty it covers you for 3 years from Purchase.

So... I've got another year and several months left. When I bought it since it was a launch system I had no idea if it was a good idea or not. There was lots of people claiming most PS3's would burst into flames if you plugged them in.

My Ps3 has behaved perfectly of course but since I use it for everything now (Upconverted CDs, Upconverted DVDs, Blu Ray, Mp3, MP4, Jpg, and Games) I'm glad to know that I have coverage for another year.

I think since the PS3 has come down in price you can get the 2 year plan (which winds up being 3 years for reasons I mentioned before) from wall mart for $30 and I would get it if I were you just because I'm enjoying the extended coverage on mine.

My PS3 may last for many more years but it's nice to know that if it died soon that I'm covered.

-Brian
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Players and Recorders

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Extended Service Warranty Newbie Discussion thejefe37 8 11-16-2009 05:18 PM
Extended warranty for LCDTV?? LCD TVs Sussudio 26 09-27-2008 06:07 AM
Sony extended warranty? PS3 grainock 7 12-10-2007 03:16 PM
PS3 Extended Warranty? Yes or No? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology fingersdlp 23 07-10-2007 11:40 PM


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM.