Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Rouge
I've already seen the film, about 2 months ago now. to try and hide potential spoilers [Show spoiler]I would say there is a commonality between time travel films which breeds familiarity, but there is a little gem to this excercise. maybe a little lucky I got to see this before interstellar, because of concept of time, but such enthralling acting from the leads draws you into their cause. a solid 4.5/5 for me.
|
Do you remember the part towards the end when
[Show spoiler]Temporal Agent Hawke takes the baby back to 1945? Isn't that baby the offspring of 1960s Hawke (Snook) and 1970s Hawke (post-op Snook)? That didn't make sense to me. How can the original Hawke exist in the first place if he is only the product of a time travel union? That is putting the cart before the horse, and doesn't seem to add up. A moment in time has to exist in an original form first before you would be able to change it through time travel.