|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $11.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $9.37 | ![]() $14.24 | ![]() $28.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $19.78 | ![]() $22.46 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
|
![]()
And that's the problem. Whether shot natively or post-converted, the left- and right-eye images are customized. Showing only one of these sides does not provide a "centered" perspective.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
Name one Lionsgate release that has a poor 2d + 3d release on the same disc, where the fault for it is the presence of 3d and not an all around buggered transfer. So once again, your worrying over nothing and the thing to be worried about is the companies ability to do competent transfers. Last edited by Suntory_Times; 03-18-2015 at 12:10 PM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Widescreenfilmguy (03-20-2015) |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
You got to my post before I meant it to have been posted. My point is no Lionsgate 3d release has needed that thus far. The way they form/edit the 3d image thus far makes what you are saying a moot point as it simply has no effect. As is the case with Avatar and many other titles.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|