|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $67.11 | ![]() $35.00 | ![]() $32.28 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 | ![]() $14.37 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 | ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $22.49 | ![]() $36.69 |
![]() |
#8 |
Power Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
I understand the point of the original post, but I must respectfully disagree. The issue is much deeper than that. Yes, it is true that copyright holders can make poor decisions, like the Alamo, but the world we live in already abuses the copyright owners enough. While the law in question definitely protects intellectual property of large corporations, but it also protects the property of the little guy. Just look at the controversy with Harper Lee for an example. Imagine a world where the estate of Tolkien would be forced to agree to a theme park by any large corporation that wants to build it. Imagine if Warner Brothers could just hire anybody to publish Harry Potter books and make them into movies and theme parks without Rowling getting anything. While we as fans would love to see all of our beloved media at any instant, there must be protections. Obviously, if the copyright holder wants to relinquish rights, they are free to do so. Whether you like it or not, Mickey Mouse and Disney are one in the same. It would simply violate the 'that ain't right rule' if another company could make Mickey Mouse cartoons.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|