|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.13 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.57 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $29.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $30.50 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I've watched a ton of HD movies on Verizon FIOS and the image quality of the movies look fantastic on my TVs. In a number of cases, I've decided to purchase or purchased a movie on Blu-Ray after seeing it on cable. Examples include Bridge to Terabithia, Mission Impossible III, Shooter, Stranger Than Fiction, and Wild Hogs. After watching these on Blu-Ray, I'm just as impressed. Any comments on the image quality of HD movies on (any) cable versus Blu-Ray? Or, is cable HD just a poor man's substitute for Blu-Ray?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Mar 2008
PSN ID- damreg1022
|
![]()
Cable HD wont be as good as a BD ( or at least it shouldnt) but its not bad by any means.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Most stuff will come through cable lines slightly compressed, because of bandwidth issues. Some look better than others, and some can get away with less compression of course.
I've seen some good, and some bad. And I can definitelys ay the more Blu-ray's I get, the more I notice the compression artifacts when they air on cable. but yeah, decent enough image quality to 'test' a potential purchase. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jun 2007
Omaha NE
-
-
-
|
![]()
My HD cable can be terrible at times. Action sequences on movies on HBO turn to giant pixilated mosaics. Although, it could be that I have too many connections. I have 7 TVs and 2 computers plus my PS3 connected. I do have a signal booster, but it doesn't always help. It is nowhere near the quality of Blu-ray.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Stations here in the states choose 720p because of the deinterlacing. 1080i video with static scenes has more vertical resolution than 720p video, while the resolution in moving scenes is lower because of field doubling. That is why I would say someone like ESPN uses 720p anyway....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I don't see any macroblocking on either of my two TVs (40" 1080i Panasonic CRT and 46" Samsung 1080p LCD) when watching HD, but the macroblocking does show up a lot during SD feeds on the LCD.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I've been a blu-ray over cable advocate for years. However, I just switched from comcast to fios and the difference is seriously night and day. I've always hated comcast but now I hate them more. They've been ruining my hd experience for years. Fios tv is nothing short of amazing and the closest thing I've ever seen to blu-ray. The audio is impressive as well. It may not be HD codecs but my speakers certainly come alive.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Versus (2000) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | Kevtronn | 132 | 07-28-2020 07:52 PM |
DD+ (HD-DVD) versus DD 5.1 (Blu-Ray) | Blu-ray Movies - North America | DanFan | 6 | 01-17-2009 04:43 PM |
DVD sales versus Blu-ray | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | blu-ray fan002 | 7 | 02-25-2008 07:23 PM |
NetFlix-HD DVD Versus Blu-ray | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | E-Dogg | 9 | 08-25-2007 12:10 AM |
Blu-ray versus HD DVD? How about neither? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Banjo | 4 | 08-17-2007 04:23 AM |
|
|