As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
11 hrs ago
Wallace & Gromit: The Complete Cracking Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$13.99
6 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.52
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
A History of Violence 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Plasma TVs
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2015, 04:14 PM   #61
schan1269 schan1269 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Sep 2013
Lake county, Indiana. Opposite end of Gary...
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IanC View Post
I went from a Panasonic Plasma to an LG 55EA9800 OLED............to a mid range Sony LED HDTV and I don't regret doing so. The OLED could deliver stunning pictures and amazing black levels, but I found it's flaws outweighed the enjoyment factor. Motion blur was really bad and weak greyscale would result in DSE.

I was really spoiled with plasma technology and the OLED simply didn't feel like a huge step up. Plus, it was terrible for gaming, which I half expected but not to the level it actually performed. I would lose hours constantly fine tuning the settings and never being happy. It's the price you pay with early adoption, I'm well aware it was a first gen LG model and the tech is constantly being improved. I will happily reconsider OLED in a couple of years. I took a substantial loss when I sold it, but the Sony LED I now use provides a great picture, smooth motion and took limited effort to tweak out of the box.
Are you confused over LED and OLED being different?

Absolutely nobody, but you...

Says OLED is "bad for gaming". (screen tearing was noticeable on early sets at 30hz. But...even 60hz cheapo LCD have screen tearing)

(if you hadn't noticed...LG has incorporated native 120hz into several models, maybe all of them now)

Last edited by schan1269; 09-30-2015 at 04:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:41 PM   #62
IanC IanC is offline
Member
 
IanC's Avatar
 
Oct 2010
Edinburgh, Scotland
1031
107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schan1269 View Post
Are you confused over LED and OLED being different?

Absolutely nobody, but you...

Says OLED is "bad for gaming". (screen tearing was noticeable on early sets at 30hz. But...even 60hz cheapo LCD have screen tearing)

(if you hadn't noticed...LG has incorporated native 120hz into several models, maybe all of them now)
Not confused at all. The gist of my post was simply that I got more satisfaction from a mid range LED TV (where I would expect flaws to be more prominent) than a high end OLED that promised the 'best viewing experience possible'. Please bear in mind, I am only referring to this model, not all OLED TV or OLED tech in general. The latest LG 4K models are holding their own, hence why I will be revisiting in a couple of years. I'm still huge believer in OLED.

I'm curious as to your 'absolutely nobody' statement, given several reviews for the EA9800 stated it would not be the preferred choice for gamers due to poor response times. OLED should of course knock this out of the park, but (on this set) it didn't. I simply found gaming a frustrating experience, something which has been echoed on the user forums. The 9800 relied an awful lot on Motion Interpolation to achieve what the advertising claimed it could do, but getting the balance right usually resulted in some sort of trade off, and I for one do not like MI technology.

Last edited by IanC; 10-01-2015 at 12:59 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 01:49 AM   #63
onyx527 onyx527 is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2015
13
46
Default

I'm in the same boat as others. My Samsung plasma still looks perfect. If we had to replace it today I really don't know what I'd get. I am not interested in LCDs, and OLED is still too new. I also didn't know they had motion problems before reading that here. Is that really the case?? They were supposed to have slightly better motion than plasma.

Hopefully they mature soon and things get fixed up. I seriously could not do an LCD.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 08:04 AM   #64
DGilberts DGilberts is offline
Special Member
 
DGilberts's Avatar
 
Apr 2014
Manchester, UK
49
370
1307
4
80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onyx527 View Post
I'm in the same boat as others. My Samsung plasma still looks perfect. If we had to replace it today I really don't know what I'd get. I am not interested in LCDs, and OLED is still too new. I also didn't know they had motion problems before reading that here. Is that really the case?? They were supposed to have slightly better motion than plasma.

Hopefully they mature soon and things get fixed up. I seriously could not do an LCD.
I'd buy a second hand plasma for sure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2015, 08:11 AM   #65
schan1269 schan1269 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Sep 2013
Lake county, Indiana. Opposite end of Gary...
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by onyx527 View Post
I'm in the same boat as others. My Samsung plasma still looks perfect. If we had to replace it today I really don't know what I'd get. I am not interested in LCDs, and OLED is still too new. I also didn't know they had motion problems before reading that here. Is that really the case?? They were supposed to have slightly better motion than plasma.

Hopefully they mature soon and things get fixed up. I seriously could not do an LCD.
Samsung and LG have made a lot of money by not underestimating stupid people.

Both add in undefeatable motion smoothing...cause...that is what stupid people want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2015, 05:43 PM   #66
Supaclyde Supaclyde is offline
Expert Member
 
Supaclyde's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
Almost Heaven, WV
147
1436
118
86
Default

My 42" Panasonic plasma turns 6 years old this month. Still going strong. I'll shed a few tears when it dies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2015, 09:06 PM   #67
Dirk504 Dirk504 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Dirk504's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
25
152
367
4
Default

I have an awesome Samsung 58 inch plasma that is still performing at a very high level. Blu Ray's look better than LCD's I see in store. Still I will be in the market for a TV sometime next year when we buy a house. I plan on buying the 65 inch LG OLED TV. Do the pictures really get worse over the years? I saw one at the store and was blown away. Even the 1080p OLED TV was amazing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2015, 06:02 PM   #68
Auditor55 Auditor55 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Sep 2011
Default

Without Plasma owners transitioning to OLED, sooner rather than later, I don't see how that technology makes it. The masses are content with LED and they will reject OLED as unnecessary.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2015, 07:20 PM   #69
Blu-Dog Blu-Dog is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Blu-Dog's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Lancaster, CA
9
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post
Without Plasma owners transitioning to OLED, sooner rather than later, I don't see how that technology makes it. The masses are content with LED and they will reject OLED as unnecessary.

The price point for OLED is what confuses me. If they can't produce them at a realistic price, no way there will me mass adoption any time soon.


I have the Kuro and a 79" Sony LED. Best picture? Kuro, of course. The Sony is an amazing movie/sports experience, but I'd rather have that than an OLED price point on a smaller television. If OLED doesn't catch on, very soon, it will be all about the money, not the picture.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2016, 04:22 PM   #70
Visionist Visionist is offline
Power Member
 
Visionist's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
South Italy
30
2
488
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antennahead View Post
Same here. "When" an 80" OLED that doesn't cost as much as a used car is available with matured tech, my 65" ZT60 will move to the bedroom. Is that overkill? A 65" bedroom TV?
Not at all, not at all...



I'll be getting an OLED when: A) Multiple 4K 75+ inchers are available for £4000 or less. B) The best performer of the lot is undisputed. C) The always online 4K disk player fiasco is either gone or at least nullified. D) Enough of my favourite films start releasing on 4K disc (The Dark Knight Trilogy will really have me by the teeth at that point- 4K IMAX!) E) I figure out ho I'm gonna incorporate ATMOS into the bedroom setup.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
antennahead (01-25-2016), Blu-Dog (01-25-2016)
Old 01-25-2016, 08:50 PM   #71
Bluyoda Bluyoda is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Bluyoda's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
Dagobah
103
160
1383
263
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sperezmore View Post
Plasma owner for years now

But.....

My wish,

75" - 85" OLED

Hopefully one day.

Regards,
My thoughts exactly.
Proud Kuro 5090 owner, but a bigger screen would be great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2016, 09:32 PM   #72
Midnight Rambler Midnight Rambler is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Midnight Rambler's Avatar
 
Jan 2011
OH-IO
2
11
949
1
13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Auditor55 View Post
Without Plasma owners transitioning to OLED, sooner rather than later, I don't see how that technology makes it. The masses are content with LED and they will reject OLED as unnecessary.
I think you may be right, considering the "masses" still are content with DVD, esp. price-wise. I don't foresee $1000 (or less) OLED's any time soon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2016, 10:02 PM   #73
DGilberts DGilberts is offline
Special Member
 
DGilberts's Avatar
 
Apr 2014
Manchester, UK
49
370
1307
4
80
Default

I was coming round, getting excited and up for buying an OLED. Until I found out the life of the panels was so short. The Panasonic OLED has a 30,000 hour life panel, so I'm told. Will be a few more years before I'm jumping in then.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2016, 12:16 AM   #74
joie joie is offline
Special Member
 
joie's Avatar
 
Mar 2011
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGilberts View Post
I was coming round, getting excited and up for buying an OLED. Until I found out the life of the panels was so short. The Panasonic OLED has a 30,000 hour life panel, so I'm told. Will be a few more years before I'm jumping in then.
You'd have to watch it like a fulltime job (2000 hours/year) for 15 years to get to 30000 hours.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2016, 08:54 AM   #75
DGilberts DGilberts is offline
Special Member
 
DGilberts's Avatar
 
Apr 2014
Manchester, UK
49
370
1307
4
80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joie View Post
You'd have to watch it like a fulltime job (2000 hours/year) for 15 years to get to 30000 hours.
My current tv has a lifetime of 100,000.00 hours.
30,000 hours is the complete life of the panel, but nobody really knows for sure whether it will reach that or not. The main consideration is by half the life of the panel when you will see a drastic decrease in the brightness. So realistically you are looking at 15.000 hours or 5-6 years of high quality viewing(if you watch your tv as a full time job). Is this really worth a £4000-£8000 investment?

A few years time will be the time to look at a new set up, i feel. Panel-Life, Motion, HDR 10 vs Dolby Vision etc etc should all be addressed by then.

Last edited by DGilberts; 01-26-2016 at 01:37 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 05:23 AM   #76
BiggNewt BiggNewt is offline
Senior Member
 
BiggNewt's Avatar
 
Mar 2012
Baltimore, MD
76
870
27
Default

I gave up on trying to find a better picture at a bigger size than my Panny Plasma. I just went with a Sony HW40ES Projector at 110" and split time between the two. Until OLED's come drastically down in price per inch, or new UHD TVs become highly supported, I can't see me upgrading to anything else for quite a while.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 12:13 PM   #77
singhcr singhcr is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
singhcr's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Apple Valley, MN
11
4
26
4
42
Default

I too have a Panasonic VT60- it is an excellent TV especially when calibrated.

I have seen some OLED display models and was very impressed: the fundamental problem with LCD technology is the back light which no longer exists for OLED. OLED holds the promise of being the ultimate panel display with the ability to display colors and intensities well beyond even what our beloved plasmas can do.

The plasma TV is the pinnacle of 1080p SDR technology in my opinion. Soon we will be getting into 4K HDR content with wider color gamuts (hopefully REC 2020) and OLED is the logical successor. As much as I love my VT60, it's nice to look forward to a new technology for a change instead of having to lament about why it isn't an improvement quality wise over what we already had (i.e. CD vs. vinyl, digital cameras over film). I'm excited!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Visionist (02-18-2016)
Old 01-28-2016, 12:29 PM   #78
Suntory_Times Suntory_Times is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Suntory_Times's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
The Grid
16
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by singhcr View Post
I too have a Panasonic VT60- it is an excellent TV especially when calibrated.

I have seen some OLED display models and was very impressed: the fundamental problem with LCD technology is the back light which no longer exists for OLED. OLED holds the promise of being the ultimate panel display with the ability to display colors and intensities well beyond even what our beloved plasmas can do.

The plasma TV is the pinnacle of 1080p SDR technology in my opinion. Soon we will be getting into 4K HDR content with wider color gamuts (hopefully REC 2020) and OLED is the logical successor. As much as I love my VT60, it's nice to look forward to a new technology for a change instead of having to lament about why it isn't an improvement quality wise over what we already had (i.e. CD vs. vinyl, digital cameras over film). I'm excited!
Indeed it is just sad that 3 years after the panny plasmas and f8500 came out we have nothing to compete against them yet. We have the promise, but it isn't yet to be seen. Motion in particular remains an issue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 01:36 PM   #79
Moonlight Shadow Moonlight Shadow is offline
Expert Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Suntory_Times View Post
Indeed it is just sad that 3 years after the panny plasmas and f8500 came out we have nothing to compete against them yet. We have the promise, but it isn't yet to be seen. Motion in particular remains an issue.
My LG OLED blows away my old f8500. It's not even in the same league. Motion handling was better on the Samsung but I strongly dislike the false contouring on Panasonic plasmas.
OLED TVs are not perfect but to suggest that they aren't as good as the latest Samsung and Panasonic plasmas is just wrong. I've had all three at home and given the choice I'd take the OLED any time. Oh wait...there isn't any choice because plasma is dead.
I certainly agree though that motion handling should be improved by LG. Even more important they should get rid of the terrible pinkish anti-glare coating that ruins black and white movies and scenes with lots of white in the image.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 01:56 PM   #80
Suntory_Times Suntory_Times is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Suntory_Times's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
The Grid
16
23
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moonlight Shadow View Post
My LG OLED blows away my old f8500. It's not even in the same league. Motion handling was better on the Samsung but I strongly dislike the false contouring on Panasonic plasmas.
OLED TVs are not perfect but to suggest that they aren't as good as the latest Samsung and Panasonic plasmas is just wrong. I've had all three at home and given the choice I'd take the OLED any time. Oh wait...there isn't any choice because plasma is dead.
I certainly agree though that motion handling should be improved by LG. Even more important they should get rid of the terrible pinkish anti-glare coating that ruins black and white movies and scenes with lots of white in the image.
I haven't seen every OLED but what I have seen the motion was enough to kill it for myself. It has also been a while since I have seen the f8500, my thoughts are really more directly related to the final panny plasmas.

I am excited for the future but we have to get there first. Or at least I have to see it myself before I get excited for it, so far that hasn't happened though being just a fan of a quality video presentation means I don't get to see everything out there by any means.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Plasma TVs



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:16 AM.