How the hell did Bioshock get a lower score for PS3?

[silversnake]

Originally Posted by ThePhantomOak

1. PS3 got a lower score because it has the same problems that the 360 had? REALLY? The game was in development at least a year with the 360 and it had the bugs... but they gave it a higher score?

2. 9.4 is a great score and I was excited to see it, BUT the fact is that they gave it a lower score than the 360 because it had the same problems. REALLY? Because porting a game is somehow the same as debugging? If the problem is the code, it should have showed up in the original review score. Period.

3. I posted a new thread because this merge EVERYTHING that has anything to do with XXXXX game is rediculous. How is the actual games review related to the Demo? It is not, and should not be merged to foul up the flow of that thread.

1. Yes, they had a year to fix it. No excuse in my opinion. Maybe the original reviewer game the score too high than.

2. They had a whole year , again, to fix it. Everyone said this would be the "ultimate" bioshock experience and if it has the same problems as the 360 it's not the ultimate experience now is it. And the expantion that makes it a newer experience for some people, isn't even available at launch.

3. That thread is the Bioshock thread and everything related to bioshock should be in that thread if not , you have a bunch of threads related to the same thing all over the forums. That thread isn't the demo thread, it's the bioshock thread with a modified title. If you go on the sticky that says Popular Game / Useful thread and click on bioshock it takes you to that thread.