|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $86.13 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.44 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $122.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $36.69 1 day ago
| ![]() $19.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $20.97 7 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
What's the least expensive Profile 2 player out right now?
I have a PS3, but I just don't have time for it anymore. Is it worth it to just go ahead and keep it as a Profile 2 BR player anyway, would it be too much of a loss to sell it and buy a new player (or find someone willing to trade)? |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
I'm not sure there is a profile 2.0 player apart from the PS3.
![]() Clearly the cheapest option is to keep the PS3 anyway. You don't have to use most of it's awesome features... (Upconverting DVDs, Upconverting CD, Playing SACDs, Playing Games, Linking to media servers, Internet access, Life with Playstation news and weather from all over the planet, Ability to store and play most types of music and video files, Nice photo slideshow options (with music) which can usually play right from most cameras either using the memory card or the USB connection, and likely lots of other cool stuff I just can't remember right now.) ...just use the Blu Ray player part. -Brian p.s. I looked it up and there is the Panasonic BD50 for ~$560 and seems some new 2.0 players are coming soon like the Sony S550. You may be able to find one of those for ~$350 according to some. Not sure what you could get for the PS3. Last edited by bhampton; 10-16-2008 at 11:01 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
What does that mean? If you don't have time to play games, just use it as a BD player. It's not like your PS3 is amortized faster if you only use it as a BD player.
Quote:
fuad |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I would go with the Samsung. It should be BD Live Ready with the new firmware. Sony is not really renowned for making great BD Players. At work I have had a lot of experience with both brands. The Samsung Players are simply better. (and cheaper)
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Eshh.. you don't read thread my friend... Tried to read the thread on Avs forum about the 1500 with BD Live...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Are you serious? With Samsungs support, or lack there of, I would get a Sony S350 anyday over the Samsung.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Are you saying the S350 or the 1500 is uber slow or both with 2.0?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Is There An Option? | Feedback Forum | PH3AR | 2 | 03-17-2010 12:12 AM |
Which option will be better? | Speakers | HomeTheaterVirgin | 3 | 08-07-2009 10:53 AM |
BD-LIVE profile 2.0 support coming but no 1080P/24 option or DTS-HD for computers yet | Blu-ray PCs, Laptops, Drives, Media and Software | HDTV1080P | 13 | 01-29-2008 04:40 AM |
Which is a better option? | Receivers | FF4ever | 2 | 01-15-2008 01:08 AM |
A different option for Sony | PS3 | Gamekid | 1 | 08-29-2006 10:15 AM |
|
|