|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best TV Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.99 | ![]() $50.47 | ![]() $11.99 | ![]() $39.99 | ![]() $27.99 | ![]() $107.09 1 day ago
| ![]() $53.99 | ![]() $67.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $48.99 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#20 |
Power Member
|
![]()
When the fields match, the luminance data of 1080i is 225% that of 720p. 1080p definitely offers benefits of dropping blended fields and accurate chroma, but that hardly qualifies a 225% drop in grey-scale resolution to put 720p on a pedestal as superior delivery format over 1080i. In motion 1080i looks much better in motion, I can really only notice interlacing when I hit freeze frame on my tv and stand a foot away from it. Interlacing is far more noticeable on 720p native channels that run interlaced advertisements presented in a field-blended mess of upscaled frames. If normal 1080i looked anything like an interlaced source field-blended in a 720p signal, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but it doesn't.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Keenan (10-07-2016) |
|
|
![]() |
|
|