|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $39.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $10.49 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.72 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.49 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $79.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.24 1 hr ago
|
![]() |
#2121 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
For reference, I'm working with 350mbps download speed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2122 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | whipnet (01-10-2017) |
![]() |
#2123 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2125 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
The only way streaming will ever overtake the video and audio quality of physical media is if physical media stops improving. With how well Ultra HD Blu-ray is selling (3 times better than Blu-ray did when it launched) that doesn't seem likely anytime soon. Last edited by PenguinMaster; 01-10-2017 at 04:27 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2126 |
Banned
|
![]()
But it isn't based on "good enough". It's based on "popular enough". Plus if a company that is highly focused on digital owns the content then it may remain digital only regardless of quality or popularity. Very few of the Amazon Originals have made it to physical media despite many of them being both popular and critically acclaimed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2127 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2128 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2129 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2130 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
If you can get concrete information that Vudu has bit rates of over 60 Mbps (like Ultra HD Blu-ray) then you'll have a case. Regardless of how fast of connection the customers have it's very expensive to host and stream 50GB to 100GB files and there is no evidence that is what Vudu is doing. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2131 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Don't you think if they were constantly upgrading their files they would fix all their problems with aspect ratios? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2132 | |||||
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...1#post12594681 Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
#2133 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
I have 100 mbps internet, but VUDU still shows more compression than Blu-ray on my TV, and I use a Roku set top box for the app. One thing that could be negatively affecting my experience to an extent is that I don't have it plugged directly to the modem via Ethernet. I have my Roku connected via WiFi. But according to Speedtest, my WiFi typically stays above 50 mbps. My modem is too far away for me to plug it in directly, but it's still very close to the TV. Maybe 12 feet away? UHD is very niche. I don't see that doing better than Blu-ray in the long run. Most people aren't clamoring for something better than HD at home. Sure, videophiles are excited about it, but even then it's not like the studios/manufacturers are making it easy to adopt this new format. There's HDR, Dolby Vision and several other things to consider and/or adjust on your TV, assuming your 4K TV even has those features included. Mine doesn't. Digital takes home entertainment in the other direction by simplifying the process. You can watch movies in HD on almost any platform with digital. All you really need is a halfway solid internet connection. If you're consistently above DSL speeds, you're golden. No discs, no hassle. It definitely has the potential to be better than physical media, and though it isn't there quite yet, I trust it'll get there. But it does require internet, where discs don't. My wife and I like to play online games, so we'd want strong internet even if streaming wasn't out there. So it's not like we have good internet just so we can stream. Good internet is almost a necessity these days, especially for people who work from home, which I plan to someday. Also, people that say VUDU far exceeds the quality of Amazon and iTunes are speaking more from past experience. I find the quality of those other streaming providers to be of the same standards as VUDU these days. I watched Mad Max Fury Road Black & Chrome Edition on iTunes the other day and it looked amazing to me. I'm pretty much always satisfied with iTunes quality. I'm satisfied with all three. But for me the real difference is in the extras department. iTunes runs circles sround the others when it comes to bonus features. That's one of my favorite things about home media. Getting to learn more about the movie, or just generally adding something extra to the overall experience. Just having the movie by itself in solid quality is nice, but having quality extras too is awesome. If the iTunes version includes all the extras found on the Blu-ray, why do I need the Blu-ray? I considered myself a videophile in the past, which is why I bought a 4K TV a couple years ago, but now I'm more of a content guy. Of course I will someday upgrade my TV again, and I'll go for something that is cutting-edge, but I won't obsess over it. One of the things that initially attracted me to Blu-ray were the exclusive extras, which Disney was big about. Now Disney seems to add exclusive extras to DMA over the Blu-rays themselves. If and when Disney begins releasing 4K Blu-rays, I don't really foresee them including exclusive extras. So far, no 4K Blu-rays have. I'm not sure that HDR/DV is enough to get me excited about 4K BD, especially since nobody knows how to properly calibrate their TVs for it at the moment. And I am definitely not going to be someone who is constantly re-calibrating my TV depending on what content I'm watching. No thanks. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | stonesfan129 (01-10-2017) |
![]() |
#2134 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2135 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
For the record, I still buy physical (bought "The Accountant" on Blu-ray today). There's just something about having an actual physical copy. I'm the same way with music, would rather have a CD than a download. I'd also rather pay one time and have access to the content forever than to pay a monthly rate for access. Last edited by stonesfan129; 01-10-2017 at 09:29 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2136 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Phantasm (Remastered) was released digitally ahead of the barebones Blu-ray. It looked pretty good. I'm sure people can appreciate a restored/remastered film digitally about as much as they do on physical media. Plus there's less overhead for the distributor if they release it digitally versus pressing thousands of discs and printing covers for them. I'm not saying the savings would be passed on to the consumer, but it saves the company money, which means it'll take less sales before they turn a profit. Of course, the question does remain whether more people bought Phantasm (Remastered) digitally or physically. Or whether people bought it because it was remastered or just because they wanted Phantasm in HD.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2138 |
Active Member
Feb 2016
|
![]()
I'm still for streaming, but cannot give up on my James Bond Blu ray Collection. Pretty sure I'll buy the 4K box set in the future. But until then, I am content with Netflix, etc....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2139 | ||
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#2140 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|