|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best PS3 Game Deals
|
Best PS3 Game Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $15.05 1 day ago
| ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $39.96 | ![]() $28.46 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $26.80 | ![]() $19.50 | ![]() $44.57 | ![]() $26.69 | ![]() $16.88 | ![]() $29.02 | ![]() $59.95 | ![]() $39.99 |
![]() |
#33 | |
Senior Member
Sep 2005
|
![]() Quote:
In the mid 90s we sat down and talked about why Beta won out over VHS. While he said there were many, many factors, from his perspective the biggest hindrance was the duration of the Beta tapes. He felt Sony gambled and lost. Movies seemed to be getting shorter in the 70s. Supposedly gone were the days of the 2 hour movie. Movies were being shown on TV in a two hour block with many minutes of commercials thus requiring significant editing. Movies were getting more expensive to make. Thus it appeared that by the early 80s very few movies would be much over 90 minutes long. So, as he understood it, Sony decided to go with a high quality format and a limit of 90 minutes per tape. By the early 80s it became apparent that the 90 minute format would not work. People wanted to tape 2 hour shows on TV. Also movies were still routinely longer than 90 minutes. With VHS having a standard mode of 2 hours virtually all movies could be shown at VHS's best quality and virtually any TV show could be recorded at VHS's best quality. True, Beta's standard quality was noticeably better than VHS's standard quality, but the 90 minute format killed them for practical use. True, Beta came out with a 3 hour mode (and later a 5 hour mode), but the 3 hour mode was no better (in the average viewers eyes) than the VHS 2 hour mode -- and how many shows were more than 2 hours but less than 3. And Beta had lost the edge with the population by the time the 3 hour format came out. True, Beta came out with extended length tapes to get about 2 hours at the highest quality, but, again, by that time VHS already had the market virtually locked up. This was just the opinion of someone who I thought should have been "in the know" on things like this. Sony appears to be taking the exact opposite tack this time... 1) Sony has attempted to put together the larger of the two consortia: Blu-ray. 2) Blu-ray has chosen a format which holds more information. 3) Blu-ray has done almost whatever is needed to get as many studios on board as possible. This will not be the same battle as 25+ years ago. Will Blu-ray win out? Absolutely no one knows. However, Sony has taken care not to make the same mistakes as last time. It may be making new ones (such as shipping single layer for the first few months and using MPEG-2 rather than AVC [H.264] for the first few movies, etc.), but it is not making the same mistakes twice. |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
PS3 and Linux...please help | PS3 | painted_klown | 5 | 10-01-2009 10:53 AM |
Linux on a PS3 | PS3 | CanadianKrazyMods | 3 | 01-19-2009 08:12 PM |
Linux on my PS3 | PS3 | junior619 | 15 | 06-17-2008 07:12 AM |
PS3 And Linux | PS3 | brett_day | 5 | 03-13-2008 03:32 AM |
Sony's PlayStation 3 supports Linux: Yellow Dog Linux 5.0 to run on PS3 | PS3 | Dave | 1 | 10-18-2006 06:01 PM |
|
|