What Would Singer's X-Men 3 Have Been Like?

[Sussudio]

Originally Posted by Uuah

It is just an opinion. One that averted the point.
I'm saying he didn't even refer to the source material
I'm not looking for what I've grown to expect of Shakespeare, if I go and see Shakespeare, but . . . I'd still expect the director of one of his works to have an understanding and appreciation of the depth of the work.
Singer didn't have to be a fan. He just should have been more respectful.
A behind the scenes doc is going to cast any director in a positive light. I'm saying my friend was there. I'm saying the guy's no big deal.
I also thought the Usual Suspects was ridiculously low par.

i do get what you are saying (and if you're not a singer fan that's fine of course), and i think you make a good point that the director should have an understanding and appreciation for the depth of his work. but what do you mean singer shouldve been more respectful (i'm asking because i'm curious and don't know, not because i'm trying to argue it)?

also ive seen a fair amount of making of docs where the director is clearly not devoted to his movie. he might be doing his job, but it doesn't mean he's putting forth 110% (big example is the alien 3 docs...david fincher looks and acts like he could care less about making the movie and more like he's doing it to boost his reputation, which he was).