|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $14.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $18.99 | ![]() $17.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $11.99 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $18.15 | ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $9.37 |
![]() |
#9 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I have a hunch that even when great strides are made to counter light loss, there will still be complaints.
It seems to me the best ways to counter light loss in situations where the light is filtered through polarizers or some other transmission medium is either (a) increase the reflectivity of the screen or (b) increase the intensity of the lamp house. Supposing one achieves both (a) and (b), such that viewing a film through filters results in just the requisite amount of brightness, then the screen without filters will always be brighter still. So I conclude that, even in optimal circumstances, when present and future technology results in superb levels of screen brightness, ill-informed spectators will behold a hyper-bright screen without glasses, then an adequately bright screen with glasses, and leap to the conclusion they are still being presented with a dim image. Last edited by bavanut; 08-24-2017 at 12:34 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|