|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $12.49 58 min ago
| ![]() $40.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $37.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $34.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $15.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 |
![]() |
#4241 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4242 |
Senior Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4243 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
BTW, just to confirm: The German Kiss Of The Dragon (AVC) is noticeably sharper/better than the US release (MPEG-2). That might seem obvious but I’ve seen posts saying there was no improvement. The real head-scratcher is why the 6.1 DTS-HD Master Audio sounds less defined than the US 5.1 DTS-HD Master Audio. I went back and forth well after I determined that there was a slight but definite PQ improvement and I’d swear I was listening to a lossy track on the German disc as opposed to a lossless US track. And, although the US BD is a Db or two hotter, that doesn’t seem to explain the AQ difference.
![]() P.S. The German release may have all the extras the US Anchor Bay release didn’t have. I’ll have to double check that against the US DVD, but there were a bunch (mostly titled in German on the DE disc menu). ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4244 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
That's why it's not in the list. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4245 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
What am I missing? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4246 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() ![]() In any case, you might want to put it back with the Anchor Bay release being best PQ if that's the case (and unless this goes down to $5, I ain't buying it again to find out ![]() ![]() Previous List Entry: US - AVC 21635 kbps, DTS-HD HR 6.1 3018 24-bit, extras, English subs (Region free) UK/AU/DE (2011 Release) - AVC 19978 kbps, DTS-HD MA 5.1 1853 16-bit, more extras, Eng subs (RF) Best PQ Last edited by Early Memphis; 10-20-2017 at 07:45 AM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (10-20-2017) |
![]() |
#4248 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
The Thing Arrow Video BDInfo. Best PQ without a doubt.
Code:
DISC INFO: Disc Title: THE THING Disc Size: 48.815.528.197 bytes Protection: AACS BD-Java: No BDInfo: 0.5.8 PLAYLIST REPORT: Name: 00003.MPLS Length: 1:48:36.551 (h:m:s.ms) Size: 32.061.255.360 bytes Total Bitrate: 39,36 Mbps VIDEO: Codec Bitrate Description ----- ------- ----------- MPEG-4 AVC Video 29959 kbps 1080p / 23,976 fps / 16:9 / High Profile 4.1 AUDIO: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- LPCM Audio English 2304 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 2304 kbps / 24-bit DTS-HD Master Audio English 2889 kbps 4.1 / 48 kHz / 2889 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 4.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 24-bit) DTS-HD Master Audio English 1682 kbps 5.1 / 48 kHz / 1682 kbps / 24-bit (DTS Core: 5.1 / 48 kHz / 768 kbps / 24-bit) Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps Dolby Digital Audio English 192 kbps 2.0 / 48 kHz / 192 kbps SUBTITLES: Codec Language Bitrate Description ----- -------- ------- ----------- Presentation Graphics English 18,103 kbps |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Clark Kent (10-22-2017), HD Goofnut (10-21-2017) |
![]() |
#4252 |
Special Member
Feb 2014
Italy
|
![]()
what about sid and nancy? Criterion or SC? i'd say Criterion...
http://caps-a-holic.com/c.php?go=1&a...=88787&i=2&l=0 |
![]() |
![]() |
#4254 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4255 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4258 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
http://caps-a-holic.com/c.php?d1=11006&d2=11009&c=4380 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4260 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
This is such a great thread and an invaluable resource. I have two questions in trying to understand the list better:
1. If multiple versions of a title are listed but there is no designation as to "Best PQ" or "Best AQ," does that mean a viewing or screen cap comparison was done but the verdict is inconclusive (i.e. no clear winner)? Or does it mean no comparison has been done yet? 2. I can understand why if the US version is the best, then it won’t be listed. Otherwise, the list would probably be too huge an undertaking. However, how do we know that a title is not on the list because the US version is the best vs. it not being on the list because no one has done a comparison yet? Thanks, keep up the great work. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (10-26-2017) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|