As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best 4K Blu-ray Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
22 hrs ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
21 hrs ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Hell's Angels 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
4 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.73
9 hrs ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$86.13
1 day ago
A Nightmare on Elm Street Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$96.99
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2018, 07:16 AM   #761
fistymusic fistymusic is offline
Active Member
 
May 2009
Sydney, Australia
Default

After all the negative feedback on the latest Disney releases from many people, and also my disappointment of Disney's releases lately, particularly in the audio department with lower volume levels & weak dynamic range, I will not upgrade to the UHD titles, but keep my blu-ray's instead. It's a shame this is happening to Disney's titles. I don't look forward to there releases anymore. Please don't release Tron in UHD at the moment. This does not seem to be an issue with other studios. Fox, buy back your catalog.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 07:26 AM   #762
s_har s_har is offline
Special Member
 
s_har's Avatar
 
Jan 2017
268
268
22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joenostalgia23 View Post


Found this at Best Buy the other day... really makes you think.
I bet Disney's atmos tracks are tailored specifically to be used with these. Maybe I should get a pair?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 08:03 AM   #763
PeterTHX PeterTHX is offline
Banned
 
PeterTHX's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
563
14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deric2014 View Post
Disney was involved nothing new.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordoftheRings View Post
That right there says it all about Disney new audio policy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by s_har View Post
I bet Disney's atmos tracks are tailored specifically to be used with these. Maybe I should get a pair?
You guys mind not posting the same GIANT picture over and over again?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 08:08 AM   #764
mikesncc1701 mikesncc1701 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
mikesncc1701's Avatar
 
Jan 2010
Jacksonville, FL
3
617
2285
798
1270
1
50
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterTHX View Post
You guys mind not posting the same GIANT picture over and over again?
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
s_har (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 08:58 AM   #765
Lnds500 Lnds500 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Lnds500's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Athens, Greece
1
214
30
12
235
2
75
Default

I've been reading the thread and various other 4K threads and I wanted to voice my opinion about something

I think it's weird how a lot of people turn on their head to justify purchasing upscales and say that "it's great", "no need of a 4K conversion" while it was the complete opposite a few years ago.

I mean, I get it, the 4K BD, as it is, is better than the standard BD, but let's be adults and admit that there is potential for something better, especially if we are to preserve and keep these films for some time.

A 2K upscale will never be as good as a 4K master, the same way a Blu-ray sourced from a DVD master was never as good as a brand new restoration.

I understand why a re-rendering hasn't happened but I'll be damned if I ever accept the argument "we tried it and couldn't tell the difference" when it comes to computer graphics and resolution .

CGI films are the only digital films that we can practically remaster for 4K and I think that's what we should be striving for and not be "1000% ok" with Disney selling us upscales.

And yes I know some people are buying this for reasons other than the resolution (HDR, Atmos), I just wanted to voice my opinion regarding the upscaling practice.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
BigBlue10989 (06-07-2018), idlebrain (06-07-2018), Jimmy Smith (06-07-2018), SmartriX (06-07-2018), starkrogersthor91 (06-07-2018), SwaGGInTheShadows (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 09:14 AM   #766
Jimmy Smith Jimmy Smith is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
May 2008
17
Default

Yeah I might make the upgrade for the one if it drops in price by a LOT. While I like this movie this doesn't seem like it offers an upgrade nearly worth its current price tag
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 10:49 AM   #767
StoogeFan1118 StoogeFan1118 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
StoogeFan1118's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
2
Default

This is one of my favorite Pixar films so I will be upgrading sound dosent bother me much im more of a video quality kind of guy. I dint have a good sound system as of now but maybe in the future i will get one. I know that wont sit well round here where people can tend to be a bit on the rude and disrespectful side when you do not have audio equipment that match their own or disagree with someones opinion but whatever. Not sure I will pay $30 for this release as the PQ does not seem to be a huge upgrade guess I will decide when im in the store movie in hand.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 10:52 AM   #768
ROSS.T.G. ROSS.T.G. is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
ROSS.T.G.'s Avatar
 
Jan 2010
Ontario, Canada
393
1549
16
Default

Yes, let us all be adults... lol wtf does that mean?
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
legends of beyond (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 12:44 PM   #769
Doctorossi Doctorossi is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Doctorossi's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
134
478
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lnds500 View Post
CGI films are the only digital films that we can practically remaster for 4K and I think that's what we should be striving for and not be "1000% ok" with Disney selling us upscales.
While I appreciate your intent, to my mind, this is a 2K movie being presented as well as the UHD disc format can allow. If a movie has more than 2K resolution and is being sourced from a 2K master for UHD disc, that's an issue for me and a failure to take advantage of the format. That's not the case here.

As much as I would enjoy a 4K re-render of The Incredibles, it would be above and beyond and I don't feel entitled to it. Again, it's a 2K movie.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Brandon B (06-07-2018), PeterTHX (06-07-2018), ryantoyota (06-14-2018), SmartriX (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 12:55 PM   #770
bbeck bbeck is offline
Expert Member
 
bbeck's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
402
680
23
25
4
3
2
34
Default

Re-rendering a 2K computer animated film from 2004 in 4K?

This isn't Blade Runner . . . there aren't hidden levels of detail just waiting to emerge with the click of an "Enhance" button in RenderMan.

Also, people may be upset that the very strong (despite clipping) DTS track wasn't transformed into something approaching Saving Private Ryan-levels of aural intensity in Atmos. I'll admit, I got my hopes up a little too. But the fact that the DTS was carried over to the 4K disc as an alternate track is noteworthy. How many other re-releases can you think of where the audio was redone and the original track was included as well?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:11 PM   #771
s_har s_har is offline
Special Member
 
s_har's Avatar
 
Jan 2017
268
268
22
Default

Re-rendering in 4K could also have other implications such as being seen as an act of #revisionism.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:12 PM   #772
reidw reidw is offline
Member
 
Mar 2010
1
Default

Raise the volume 8 to 10 points to experience Dolby Atmos? Why not just raise the volume on the regular tracks? Either way the sound bounces off the ceiling and it seems that the effect is just about the same? (As I've been saying for months).

When this movie was announced for 4K there were several postings musing about how great the image and sound was going to be. I tried to point out that you can't add what wasn't there in the first place (detail, colour etc.). More than one poster rebutted that Pixar would be sure to improve those facets of the presentation although that seemed to me to be nothing more than an assumption. I was a sceptic and it seems I was right to be so. Pixar in fact may have subtracted from an excellent 1080P Bluray. Disappointing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:18 PM   #773
bbeck bbeck is offline
Expert Member
 
bbeck's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
402
680
23
25
4
3
2
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reidw View Post
Pixar in fact may have subtracted from an excellent 1080P Bluray. Disappointing.
Check out the PQ reviews on the past few pages of this thread.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:24 PM   #774
Nothing371 Nothing371 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Nothing371's Avatar
 
Jul 2015
Minneapolis
526
1047
11
Default

I'm going to need people to explain one thing for me regarding the Disney Dolby Atmos situation.

If all that is required for you to achieve a normal level of Atmos sound is for you to turn you volume up 8-10 notches, then what is the problem?

(serious question. I'm not looking to instigate; just trying to understand. I use a simple 2.1 soundbar and have little knowledge about Atmos setups.)
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
SmartriX (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 01:25 PM   #775
bbeck bbeck is offline
Expert Member
 
bbeck's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
402
680
23
25
4
3
2
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by s_har View Post
Re-rendering in 4K could also have other implications such as being seen as an act of #revisionism.
Seems to me like revisionism is the name of the game when it comes to most of these 4K releases. (HDR, to say nothing of remixing for Atmos.) The trick is achieving a level of revisionism that most people will like.

I for one would much prefer a picture that hews as closely as possible to the artist's original intent than one that continually "pops" from one scene to the next just for the sake of wowing people. If that means The Incredibles gets a "minor" uptick in detail and "more restrained" application of HDR, so be it in my book.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
s_har (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 01:31 PM   #776
jh901 jh901 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
jh901's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
PITTSBURGH PA
1
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reidw View Post

When this movie was announced for 4K there were several postings musing about how great the image and sound was going to be. I tried to point out that you can't add what wasn't there in the first place (detail, colour etc.).

Pixar in fact may have subtracted from an excellent 1080P Bluray.

Disappointing.
Are you here to learn or to find reinforcement for your notion that image quality can't be improved since there isn't a 4K master source?

Sincerely.

Also, can you point to evidence that supports your claim that "Pixar in fact may have subtracted from an excellent 1080P Bluray"? Honestly, I don't think you can find a shred of evidence to support this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:36 PM   #777
avs commenter avs commenter is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Apr 2018
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssb0224 View Post
Glad I haven't opened my UHD yet, considering a return to BB... may wait for Bill Hunt's take as well, but I absolutely will not give Disney premium $ for a sub-premium product.
Not all heroes wear capes
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 01:36 PM   #778
jh901 jh901 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
jh901's Avatar
 
Nov 2012
PITTSBURGH PA
1
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nothing371 View Post
I'm going to need people to explain one thing for me regarding the Disney Dolby Atmos situation.
There isn't a problem with Atmos exclusively. Forget about Atmos for a moment.

Please. Just. Forget about it.

DOLBY TRUEHD 7.1

^This is the problem.

Anyone who can't hear the shortcomings on Black Panther or Ragnarok or Coco simply don't have experience or don't have a good enough set-up (or perhaps simply don't care much about sound). I can't comment on The Incredibles 4K specifically as far as this issue goes.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Nothing371 View Post

If all that is required for you to achieve a normal level of Atmos sound is for you to turn you volume up 8-10 notches, then what is the problem?
See above.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
drawn (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 01:39 PM   #779
Nothing371 Nothing371 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Nothing371's Avatar
 
Jul 2015
Minneapolis
526
1047
11
Default

ok that doesn't explain the problem at all.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
afr52 (06-07-2018), PeterTHX (06-07-2018)
Old 06-07-2018, 01:43 PM   #780
BigBlue10989 BigBlue10989 is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2011
17
212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jh901 View Post
There isn't a problem with Atmos exclusively. Forget about Atmos for a moment.

Please. Just. Forget about it.

DOLBY TRUEHD 7.1

^This is the problem.

Anyone who can't hear the shortcomings on Black Panther or Ragnarok or Coco simply don't have experience or don't have a good enough set-up
(or perhaps simply don't care much about sound). I can't comment on The Incredibles 4K specifically as far as this issue goes.




See above.
Or they value actual fidelity over dynamic range, like myself.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > 4K Ultra HD > 4K Blu-ray and 4K Movies



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 AM.