|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $21.31 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $67.11 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $22.79 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.32 1 day ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $14.37 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#8 |
Power Member
|
![]()
I have nothing against cgi. I’m just giving my thoughts on the subject.
Both hand drawn and CG take a lot of work but I’m guessing hand drawn is more painstaking because you’re literally drawing every frame without any “tools”. So I’ve always thought can’t they just use cgi to make something look like hand drawn animation? Maybe they have. How could you tell right? Although there was an error on the The Simpsons not long ago that makes me think it is computer animated now. Which is cool...that was a very rare glitch. (A lot of cartoons use flash I think). Surely modern day CGI can replicate the look of 2D animation. Unless they just think 3D is more profitable. I don’t know maybe. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|