|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $99.99 |
![]() |
#17361 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
I’m a firm believer that if you have to explain a joke, there is no joke (thank you Joker). That being said, there’s always a little truth in a joke. I think we’ve lost some of the simplicity of everyday viewing by trying to reproduce the movie going experience. I truly miss pushing play and watching something without a second thought. It wasn’t until we bought our first HD set up that I started to care about my set up more.
As I’ve said several times since buying our new house, unfortunately I can’t set up my front room to accommodate my receiver and sound system in my front room. The Inner Sanctum in our old house was more inline with a proper set up and now that we’ve I have no idea when my attic will go through a remodel. There are far too many other projects that need our attention before it. So for the moment, I have to be happy with what I have. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17362 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17363 | |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17365 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | sapiendut (09-03-2019), The_Donster (09-03-2019) |
![]() |
#17372 |
Active Member
|
![]()
I have been doing a fair bit of thinking about this recently, so I'm going to regurgitate my thoughts here and hopefully get some other opinions/find some more justification for the track i'm heading down.
1. Storage space. For physical media buffs and cinephiles, displaying and storing your collection coherently has to be considered. I'm currently maxed out at just over 1200 Blu Rays with a custom storage cupboard. After this point, its garage storage or boxes. I am starting to think i'm probably served better by partly culling my collection and only replacing essential films on Blu Ray with 4K when they come out. There will be a few that come out each year I need space for and the obligatory Arrow or Criterion (etc) release that needs a physical copy. 2. Non-essential 4K. There is plenty of movies worth watching that come out each year that are not always worth owning and/or don't have particularly big soundtracks that require the absolute best source to enjoy. Apple TV now offers Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos on many of their recent releases - albeit with compression, offer HD for many films that haven't got to Blu Ray yet and 4K of movies that haven't had a physical 4K release yet. Mindless accumulation of physical copies of films that gather dust and will never be watched more than once doesn't seem like the best way forward. As a caveat, I get the whole idea about 'supporting the format', but tbh i'm unsure many of the studios (Sony excluded) are really supporting us. We pay a premium in many cases for the same soundtrack and the same master that was on the Blu Ray and keep getting fed near field or 'atmouse' mixes by Disney. Furthermore, I probably also need to add that I have a fairly high end system that I have spent a lot of time and money building, therefore I can tell the difference between poor/compressed sources and good sources. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Wes_k089 (09-06-2019) |
![]() |
#17375 | |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() Quote:
![]() A digital copy is no more likely to be watched repeatedly than a physical one; how much you like the movie determines that, not the format. You seem to think that the studios provide a better master to the streaming providers than are used for discs without any evidence to support the claim. Whether or not a movie is worth owning, and on which format, is an entirely subjective matter and not for you, or me, to decide for anyone but ourselves. Last edited by Vilya; 09-06-2019 at 05:39 AM. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | JEDGAR1000 (09-06-2019) |
![]() |
#17376 |
Active Member
Jun 2013
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17377 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Thanks for the replies.
I'm well aware of the differences between formats. The question was more about what should be purchased on physical media in terms of maximizing utility. In general, digital copies cost a lot less and can be rented (in 4K) for even less. It's a good solution. Also aware this is a somewhat subjective group of questions/thoughts, but there has be some sort of objectivity when you're talking numbers as high as this. There is only so many days in a year, space in a room and funds to spend on films. For example, all power to you for your collection. Fantastic selection of films. But we all don't have an entire room to store them in coherently and accessibly, and/or endless hours to watch them all multiple times. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17378 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | benedictopacifico (09-06-2019), Wes_k089 (09-06-2019) |
![]() |
#17379 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17380 | |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() Quote:
The underlined portion applies no matter how you buy your films and thus is irrelevant in evaluating the two formats. A physical disc of a movie takes the same amount of time to watch as does a digital copy of it. Available funds for this hobby vary from person to person; what I can afford and what you can afford might be very different. My criteria for purchasing a movie may well be different than yours, too. Storage space varies widely, too. I have found that most people have a lot of something; sometimes they have lots of several somethings. My "something" is my movie collection. If you inventoried my home you would likely find that it is has no more stuff in it than do the homes of most people. There is no requirement that a movie be watched "X" amount of times before its purchase is justified; we each decide that justification for ourselves. I find that buying the movie and watching it even just once is more cost effective than taking two or more people to see it at the theater where we will also view it just once. My home viewing environment is quite nice, more comfortable, and I serve better concessions. Buying the movie on disc is both a better value and a better experience. The disc usually comes with the code, too, which I can sell to offset my disc purchase, redeem myself, give away, or simply ignore- which is my usual choice. Last edited by Vilya; 09-06-2019 at 08:05 AM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|