|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals
|
Best iTunes Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $12.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $7.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $12.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $12.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.97 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $4.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 17 hrs ago
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#17 |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]()
Does an MPEG2 encoded DVD with a far greater bitrate look better than a SD stream encoded with H.264 and its much heavier compression? I believe in general that the DVD does look better because compression artifacts suck no matter the codec.
Last edited by Vilya; 12-29-2019 at 08:31 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|