As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
5 hrs ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
4 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
16 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.50
11 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2007, 11:41 PM   #1
BluDrew BluDrew is offline
Banned
 
Aug 2007
Angry Bill Hunt's Two Cents posts about Paramount, Warner, etc.

Bill Hunt is as much of a Blu-ray fan as all of us, but his latest "My Two Cents" piece (Aug 22) struck me as a little off. He seems open to the possibility that Warner is going to go HD DVD exclusive as well. Here is what he wrote (the parts that have me concerned are in bold):

Quote:
A lot of people have asked us if we still believe Blu-ray is the better choice, with the better chance to win, and for the most part we do. But there's no doubt that some of Blu-ray's building momentum was lost yesterday. On the other hand, Blu-ray still has an edge in market share in terms of the Hollywood studios. But if Warner goes exclusive for HD-DVD too, Hollywood will basically be evenly split....

By the way, we've heard back from both Warner and New Line this morning. Warner says their format neutral stance remains in place... at least for now ("We haven't announced anything otherwise," was the basic quote). And New Line said they still plan to support both high-def formats, and will contact us when they have news about titles and dates.

The last 48 hours have certainly been tumultuous. What the next 48 hours might bring is anyone's guess.
And now Beatboy77 from AVS, who has been right about some announcements, wrong about others, seems to think it could happen. In this post he says:

Quote:
Found out some possible huge positive news for HD-DVD today as well

I am at the point where I really want this war overwith. If it's HD-DVD the winner, great, if it's Blu-ray, great, if it's 2 more years of the format war...Oh God!
And then later on when asked what the positive news for HD DVD was he replies with:

Quote:
I heard a little while a go that WB is seriously considering going HD-DVD Exclusive. If they decide to go this route, they will announce by Friday this week.
Someone please tell me how I should read this. I've started supporting HD DVD to an extent, but I REALLY need to know that Warner is staying NEUTRAL.

Last edited by BluDrew; 08-22-2007 at 11:43 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:44 PM   #2
Balian Balian is offline
Active Member
 
Balian's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Microsoft bribing Warner is the next logical step. BDA better get on the ball or Microsoft will control all. It might be too late.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:47 PM   #3
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

If it is a matter of big gobs of free money versus customer service and corporate ethics.

Who knows what is going to happen. If Warner does go exclusive, it will be an even bigger slap in the face to consumers than Paramount.

The biggest title on HD up to now is mere weeks out the door, and the 200+K units (and counting sold) on Blu-ray should mean something.

We'll see if they do.

Gary
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:48 PM   #4
blublublu blublublu is offline
Banned
 
Jan 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluDrew View Post
Bill Hunt is as much of a Blu-ray fan as all of us, but his latest "My Two Cents" piece (Aug 22) struck me as a little off. He seems open to the possibility that Warner is going to go HD DVD exclusive as well. Here is what he wrote (the parts that have me concerned are in bold):



And now Beatboy77 from AVS, who has been right about some announcements, wrong about others, seems to think it could happen. In this post he says:



And then later on when asked what the positive news for HD DVD was he replies with:



Someone please tell me how I should read this. I've started supporting HD DVD to an extent, but I REALLY need to know that Warner is staying NEUTRAL.
Ignore beatboy... he has a terrible track record.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:49 PM   #5
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balian View Post
Microsoft bribing Warner is the next logical step. BDA better get on the ball or Microsoft will control all. It might be too late.
MS bribing Warner will raise a red flag to the SEC or EU. They got away with Paramount, why risk it, they prolonged this war. If they do get flaged you can expect its going to hurt MS pretty bad as they are going to be spending money in legal fees and possibly facing huge fines. Its not worth it to them. Universal and Paramount in more than enough to keep this war going.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:51 PM   #6
ryoohki ryoohki is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ryoohki's Avatar
 
May 2007
6
6
8
5
Default

The only reason Warner sold 300,000+ copie of 300 is because bluray participate for 75% of that note (almost)
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:53 PM   #7
blublublu blublublu is offline
Banned
 
Jan 2007
Default

Bear in mind that MS (even if they were involved with the Paramount buyout - which there is no proof of) doesn't really want HD DVD to be successful. A stalemate will suit them fine, and they don't need to move WB to produce a stalemate, that's already been accomplished.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:55 PM   #8
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blublublu View Post
Bear in mind that MS (even if they were involved with the Paramount buyout - which there is no proof of) doesn't really want HD DVD to be successful. A stalemate will suit them fine, and they don't need to move WB to produce a stalemate, that's already been accomplished.
exactly! no need to spend hundreds of millons of dollars until its absolutely nesseccay, which it isn't as both formats are in jeopardy at the current stage.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:56 PM   #9
BluDrew BluDrew is offline
Banned
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blublublu View Post
Bear in mind that MS (even if they were involved with the Paramount buyout - which there is no proof of) doesn't really want HD DVD to be successful. A stalemate will suit them fine, and they don't need to move WB to produce a stalemate, that's already been accomplished.
Well for a company that doesn't really want HD DVD to be successful, they sure seem to be doing everything they can to make sure it succeeds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:57 PM   #10
E-Dogg E-Dogg is offline
Expert Member
 
E-Dogg's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
159
Default

The war could honestly go in either direction at this point, but I am hoping this rumor gets laid to rest sooner rather than later. If by some act of the devil WB goes HD-DVD exclusive it will be a major blow that may cause many to start to favor the inferior format.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:57 PM   #11
Охранное Охранное is offline
Member
 
Охранное's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Опричнина
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dialog_gvf View Post
If it is a matter of big gobs of free money versus customer service and corporate ethics.
Is it "free money" if exclusivity is a requirement? Or if there are any requirements?
Quote:
Who knows what is going to happen. If Warner does go exclusive, it will be an even bigger slap in the face to consumers than Paramount.

The biggest title on HD up to now is mere weeks out the door, and the 200+K units (and counting sold) on Blu-ray should mean something.

We'll see if they do.

Gary
I still wish we could find out if the BDA is given an opportunity to match incentive offers or not. I mean, who entertains bids from only one suitor when there are two equally hungry out there?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:58 PM   #12
monkyman monkyman is offline
Special Member
 
monkyman's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Balian View Post
Microsoft bribing Warner is the next logical step.
I'm sure it was done at the same time Paramount was, hopeing they would get at least one studio. The fact that Paramount news came out and blindsided the BDA, it may also be to late for the BDA to react and talk to Warner.

However if Bill Hunt said that Warner is still neutral at this time means there has been no contract signed as he knows. I'm sure the BDA is asking what it will take to stay neutral or support BD.

Don't listen to anything your freind from AVS has to say, He also claims the BDA has news that will end this war in BDA's favor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2007, 11:59 PM   #13
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluDrew View Post
Well for a company that doesn't really want HD DVD to be successful, they sure seem to be doing everything they can to make sure it succeeds.
no. blu-ray was going to win, by q1 08, they did what they had to with paramont to secure it got them to q1 09, buys them time. no need to do anything until doom looks immenant again, then flash the wallet again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:02 AM   #14
buckshot buckshot is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
buckshot's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
san die ego
2
9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryoohki View Post
The only reason Warner sold 300,000+ copie of 300 is because bluray participate for 75% of that note (almost)
unfortunately $220,000,000 goes a long way to subsidize our movie buying. i would love to see the bda come out of left field and offer $250,000,000 and steal wb exclusivity. that would be nice. otherwise this gets really ugly. but it basically puts us back at the spot before launch. paramount and wb were orignially hd dvd supporters and i still picked blu. i stand by blu. i doubt that blu would lose before the contracts on wb a paramount run out. then universal's will be up, and we could see the exodus then. sad that it will take so long. but none of our exclusive supporters look to be going anywhere. then it becomes an old school bare knuckle brawl. which may very well see the big guns come out sooner then they would otherwise. i still think blu will win. it will just take a little while longer. i don't think the m$ higher ups wpuld be willing to put up another $400,000,000 for something that they don't even want.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:04 AM   #15
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E-Dogg View Post
The war could honestly go in either direction at this point, but I am hoping this rumor gets laid to rest sooner rather than later. If by some act of the devil WB goes HD-DVD exclusive it will be a major blow that may cause many to start to favor the inferior format.
Because, you'll just have to accept how lousy all those Sony, Fox/MGM, Disney and LGF titles will look on the inferior format?

It will cause people to consider getting an HD DVD player. But, honestly, will they then start waiting for BD studios to switch?

And, every title you purchase, won't you be thinking how the defector forced you into the situation?

Every skip.
Every disc that won't play.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:05 AM   #16
JAGUAR1977 JAGUAR1977 is offline
Special Member
 
JAGUAR1977's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
1
Default

If the BDA stand by and let this happen they don't deserve our support.

Your call BDA, Microsoft are showing more guts for the fight, you only have yourselves to blame, it even took Paramounts defection for FOX to announce their titles.

I'll have a look on ebay for a cheap HD-DVD player to add to my PS3!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:05 AM   #17
Jim L Jim L is offline
Special Member
 
Jim L's Avatar
 
Apr 2006
Myrtle Beach, SC
12
20
Exclamation I can't believe all the pessimism here!

Guys, we need to chill out.

Go to fridge, get a cold beverage, then crank up your system and watch your favorite Blu-ray movie!

Don't worry about what hasn't happened yet. Things are going to play out in the coming weeks and months, and there isn't much we can do about it individually.

Having said that, if worse comes to worst, I will still enjoy my BD movies. I just can't get all of my movies in HD. There will be other options, like using the PS3 as an HD-PVR or connecting to your own media server filled with HD downloads. I don't know what I'll do yet, but I am not going to buy a Toshiba anything!

Think of it from the HD DUD owners' perspective: they are definitely in the weaker position, even if Warner goes exclusive.

Do all the studios really want to kill their next distribution channel? DVD is in decline and has no copy protection. Piracy is rampant. HD downloads do not have the infrastructure in place to accomplish iit n a satisfactory manner. The studios need cash flow NOW. I can't believe they would all be so stupid as to piss away the opportunity at a unified format for movie distribution. (but you never know)

Just my 2 cents.

Now that I've said that, I'm going to watch Immortal Beloved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:06 AM   #18
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beatboy77
I am at the point where I really want this war overwith. If it's HD-DVD the winner, great, if it's Blu-ray, great, if it's 2 more years of the format war...Oh God!
This is the same kind of panic and chaos I've seen from some people even around here.

Yet again: Where's the heart? Where's the resolve?

This is an unacceptable answer to me. No, I don't want HD-DVD to win just so the war can be over with sooner.

That kind of hysterical statement is credibility damaging right there.


Quote:
Originally Posted by blublublu View Post
Ignore beatboy... he has a terrible track record.
A bit spotty.

Last edited by JTK; 08-23-2007 at 12:27 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:06 AM   #19
Slapper Slapper is offline
Special Member
 
Slapper's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
I live in a pineapple under the sea...
277
Default

If HD-DVD does NOT get Warner exclusively I think the advantage will still be largely Blu unless Microsoft and Toshiba push them to release more movies. They've only put out a little over 30 different hi-def movies since this war started, correct? It'll sting not being able to get T-Formers and Shrek cubed but it could be worse.

If HD-DVD gets Warner then Blu-ray is going to sink this holiday season. Harry Potter will sell an s-load of standalone HD-DVD players.

Anyhoo, I still don't think M$ is going to put up any more money this year. They pi$$ed away alot of money already. $1 billion on the XBox repair program. $150 million on Paramount. I figure they would have to offer Warner at least double what they paid Paramount. That's alot of money to be flushing down the toilet and it's a lot of explaining to do to stockholders.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2007, 12:09 AM   #20
JTK JTK is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
JTK's Avatar
 
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapper View Post
If HD-DVD does NOT get Warner exclusively I think the advantage will still be largely Blu unless Microsoft and Toshiba push them to release more movies. They've only put out a little over 30 different hi-def movies since this war started, correct? It'll sting not being able to get T-Formers and Shrek cubed but it could be worse.
Agreed.

Quote:

If HD-DVD gets Warner then Blu-ray is going to sink this holiday season. Harry Potter will sell an s-load of standalone HD-DVD players.
Totally disagree.

HD-DVD will see some nice sales but it will not sink BD.

Blu will be strong on the content side when you see what Fox, Disney, MGM, and SPE have lined up.

Honestly, I've about resigned myself to the idea that Warner is probably going back to being a full HD-DVD supporter vs. the 75 percent supporter they've been this whole time anyways.

Anything past that will be a pleasant bonus in my eyes.

Quote:
Anyhoo, I still don't think M$ is going to put up any more money this year. They pi$$ed away alot of money already. $1 billion on the XBox repair program. $150 million on Paramount. I figure they would have to offer Warner at least double what they paid Paramount. That's alot of money to be flushing down the toilet and it's a lot of explaining to do to stockholders.
We all like to single out MS because it's fun, but some of the money also comes from Toshiba, Universal, and whomever is in their circle, so to speak.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Bill Hunt's Advice to Blu Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Prometheus59650 11 03-07-2008 05:24 AM
Bill Hunt's call to end the war. Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Prometheus59650 57 01-26-2008 10:50 PM
Bill Hunt's latest on the format war (September 12) Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology DJeffries 125 09-16-2007 10:05 PM
Bill Hunt's latest 2¢ post Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology ReduxInflux 90 09-10-2007 11:09 PM
Bill Hunt's take is up on the Paramount announcement Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology doctorD 30 08-21-2007 08:02 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:38 PM.