Total Recall (1990) Vs. Total Recall (2012) - Blu-ray Forum

Movies Blu-ray 4K 3D DVD Digital MA iTunes Prime Games People Forum

▼

United States

Login

Join

Home

News

DVD

MA

My Blu‑ray.com

As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!

×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »

Top deals | New deals

Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)

Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)

The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)

Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)

How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)

The Creator 4K (Blu-ray)

Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)

Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)

The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)

Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)

Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)

Superman 4K (Blu-ray)

		Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Movies > Movie Polls
Total Recall (1990) Vs. Total Recall (2012)

View Poll Results: Total Recall (1990) VS Total Recall (2012)
Total Recall (1990)		72	92.31%
Total Recall (2012)		6	7.69%
Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll

Prev

Previous Post

Next Post

Next

07-18-2020, 12:45 PM	#6
BluRayTim Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Apr 2008 Location:Farmingdale, Nassau County, Long Island, New York, America 11735 4K collection:15 Blu-ray collection:60 DVD collection:8	1990 hands down. Colin Farrell is too skinny to convincingly play such an action hero, though he is 5’ 11” and 180 pounds, making him only three inches shorter but 115 pounds lighter than Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is very muscular.

Go Back

Tags

1990, movie, recall, total

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:38 PM.