|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best PS5 Games Deals
|
Best PS5 Games Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $15.00 | ![]() $39.99 31 min ago
| ![]() $62.99 | ![]() $34.99 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $69.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $69.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $48.00 | ![]() $69.00 1 day ago
| ![]() $81.04 | ![]() $31.86 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Gaming Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know for sure but I'd imagine the savings from using lower CU is greater than the cost of the cooling method. I think it has more to do with yield also. They should be able to achieve a much better yield on production, it's also possible that CUs could be unlocked if production yield is perfect. But the benefit of an extra 2 CUs could be negligible anyway so might not even be worth the effort. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|