As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
14 hrs ago
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.44
1 hr ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
16 hrs ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
1 day ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$80.68
1 day ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Halloween II 4K (Blu-ray)
$19.99
6 hrs ago
Peanuts: Ultimate TV Specials Collection (Blu-ray)
$72.99
 
I Know What You Did Last Summer 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.99
1 day ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
1 day ago
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
1 day ago
Batman 4-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: After Reading This Megathread, Will you still purchase LOTR?
Yes 386 59.75%
No 260 40.25%
Voters: 646. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2009, 02:25 PM   #1441
BluBrown BluBrown is offline
Power Member
 
BluBrown's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Feeling Minnesota!
15
50
1201
56
15
14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marine Mike View Post
The movie industry isn't made up of non-profit organizations.
IMO this would make even more of a profit as very few people would wait for the ultimate boxset if both versions were released simultaneously. Everyone who wants LOTR on blu would buy it and it would become the fastest selling blu to date. Then down the line Warner would make even more money off of us on some definitive collection, especially if it had a sneak peek at The Hobbit. How many more copies of Batman Begins do you think Warner sold by including the opening sequence of The Dark Knight in the bonus materials?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:37 PM   #1442
GoodToGo GoodToGo is offline
Active Member
 
Oct 2008
415
Default

I think people who want the EE's are missing a very important point. The EE version will cost a lot more than the TE. In the current economic situation, I dont think people would want to spend more to buy the EE. In addition, most people wont even care for the EE and will straight off buy the TE. I realize there may be a lot of vocal die hard fans here but most of the buyers wont even know there was an EE released on the DVD. Even if they knew, they wont be willing to fork over the extra cash for all the additional stuff. Sucks for the EE fans but as in all things, majority wins.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:43 PM   #1443
Ernest Rister Ernest Rister is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Ernest Rister's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
100
590
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
it has around 220 one-star ratings on amazon.com

i didnt read them all but im assuming near 100% of them are because they are not extended
And they're bare bones, meaning no bonus features at all. I can see that bothering people.

Last edited by Ernest Rister; 04-20-2009 at 02:45 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:47 PM   #1444
P@t_Mtl P@t_Mtl is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
P@t_Mtl's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Montreal
4
452
513
3
Send a message via Yahoo to P@t_Mtl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodToGo View Post
I think people who want the EE's are missing a very important point. The EE version will cost a lot more than the TE. In the current economic situation, I dont think people would want to spend more to buy the EE. In addition, most people wont even care for the EE and will straight off buy the TE. I realize there may be a lot of vocal die hard fans here but most of the buyers wont even know there was an EE released on the DVD. Even if they knew, they wont be willing to fork over the extra cash for all the additional stuff. Sucks for the EE fans but as in all things, majority wins.
I don't mind they release the TE first. Oh I know there is a lot of complaining going on by a lot of people. For me personaly I do get why they are releasing the TE first. For the "average joe" that's all they truly know of the movies and it make sense to have the most known version out in other to generate interest in the movie.

As for me, I just prefer the EE versions. Only saw the TE once each in theater and I have no more wish to see them. Will only wait for the EE.

What does get to me is the TE fans coming down on those who prefer waiting for the EE instead of jumping on the TE.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:47 PM   #1445
ckenisell ckenisell is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ckenisell's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Round Rock, TX
368
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluBrown View Post
Not to sound like I'm "whining" but why couldn't they release both versions now with seamless branching just as they did with the most recent SD releases and then years down the road release the Super Ultimate Deluxe edition boxset to coincide with The Hobbit. I'm sure there is enough unreleased material to get the real hard core fans (myself included) to double dip on a definitive blu-ray collection.
This is my argument. It's not like it would take a LOT of work to get the seamless branching to work. They already have the flow chart from when the seamless branching SD DVDs were authored.

This is very simply a way for Warner to take advantage of our inability to have patience. They are VERY aware of consumers' want for instant gratification. If they release a seamless branching version now and then released an Ultimate Deluxe version later, very few consumers would purchase it (just for the special features) at a premium price later on if they already had the seamless branching version.

This is THE ABSOLUTE BEST METHOD for Warner to maximize profits on this trilogy. THAT'S the bottom line. The push-back from consumers (on this forum and at the cash register when they DON'T purchase the Theatrical Release) are the ONLY ways in which consumers feel like they have a voice. I say more power to the consumer and encourage those who claim they won't purchase to stick with it. Don't cave and buy it anyway. This is the ONLY way that Warner and other studios will get the message.

I HOPE that a TON of people DON'T buy this release. There are absolutely ZERO reasons why they couldn't release a bare-bones seamless branching version this year. It's ALL for business purposes. You can't blame Warner for trying, but you don't have to buy it.

It's for the reasons stated above that I am renting this version and buying the EE's when they are released.

Last edited by ckenisell; 04-20-2009 at 02:56 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 02:53 PM   #1446
BluBrown BluBrown is offline
Power Member
 
BluBrown's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Feeling Minnesota!
15
50
1201
56
15
14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodToGo View Post
I think people who want the EE's are missing a very important point. The EE version will cost a lot more than the TE. In the current economic situation, I dont think people would want to spend more to buy the EE. In addition, most people wont even care for the EE and will straight off buy the TE. I realize there may be a lot of vocal die hard fans here but most of the buyers wont even know there was an EE released on the DVD. Even if they knew, they wont be willing to fork over the extra cash for all the additional stuff. Sucks for the EE fans but as in all things, majority wins.
These people you speak of that don't even know the EE's exsist also probably don't have BD players and won't be getting one to upgrade their TE copies of LOTR given the current "economic situation."
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 03:10 PM   #1447
ckenisell ckenisell is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ckenisell's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Round Rock, TX
368
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoodToGo View Post
I think people who want the EE's are missing a very important point. The EE version will cost a lot more than the TE. In the current economic situation, I dont think people would want to spend more to buy the EE. In addition, most people wont even care for the EE and will straight off buy the TE. I realize there may be a lot of vocal die hard fans here but most of the buyers wont even know there was an EE released on the DVD. Even if they knew, they wont be willing to fork over the extra cash for all the additional stuff. Sucks for the EE fans but as in all things, majority wins.
It's not like the TE's are exactly cheap. $100 MSRP for a bare-bones trilogy is still pretty high. I don't care how long the movies are.

Second, if Warner really cared about us EE fans, when the EE's are released, they'd let us send in our TE Blu-Rays (along with the original receipt) for a FULL CREDIT (or close to a full credit) towards the EE's. Like a rebate. Or something like a $50 mail-in rebate for buying both the TE's AND the EE's. Now THAT would make EE fans happy. I don't see that happening. It wouldn't be good for Warner's pocketbook (which is the ONLY thing that matters here. NOT the consumer.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 04:07 PM   #1448
Irrob Irrob is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Irrob's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
USA
49
61
880
16
4
91
Default

I watched the theatrical trilogy (which I might add, are the versions that raked in the box office coin, and the academy awards) on TNT this past weekend. Ugh. I'm quite happy to have LOTR on Blu sooner rather than later. This is a HUGE plus for the Blu-ray format.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 04:55 PM   #1449
ckenisell ckenisell is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ckenisell's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Round Rock, TX
368
3
Default

I refuse to watch this trilogy (in any form) on TNT-HD. Their bug is annoying, the graphic pop-ups are annoying and commercials (even though I can skip them with the DVR) are annoying. If I were Peter Jackson, I would cringe everytime I see or hear about LOTR airing on TNT.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 05:33 PM   #1450
AintNoSin AintNoSin is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
AintNoSin's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
Above the Convenience Store
136
594
299
212
18
Default

I hate to repeat myself.

We will not have to wait 3 years for the EE on Blu. Jackson only said that they will be released "closer" to the release date of The Hobbit, not "close to" or at the same time.

My guess, based on nothing more than it being how I would handle it. They'd probably release the EEs separately and not in a box set. FOTR would come two years to eighteen months before the release of The Hobbit, it would contain the first available footage from the new films. The next two films would follow 6 to 9 month apart, each containing a new and expanded Hobbit trailer.

If we see a box set, my bet would be a combined Hobbit/LOTR set contain both versions of all movies (because you just know there will be EE versions of The Hobbit movies too, right?).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 05:38 PM   #1451
bases1616 bases1616 is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2008
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ckenisell View Post
It's not like the TE's are exactly cheap. $100 MSRP for a bare-bones trilogy is still pretty high. I don't care how long the movies are.

Second, if Warner really cared about us EE fans, when the EE's are released, they'd let us send in our TE Blu-Rays (along with the original receipt) for a FULL CREDIT (or close to a full credit) towards the EE's. Like a rebate. Or something like a $50 mail-in rebate for buying both the TE's AND the EE's. Now THAT would make EE fans happy. I don't see that happening. It wouldn't be good for Warner's pocketbook (which is the ONLY thing that matters here. NOT the consumer.)
You hit the nail right on the head Chet. Warner has been the worst big studio out there when it comes to Blu-ray. They have already double dipped on Superman Returns because they did not do lossless audio on the first release. I am sure Journey to the Center of the Earth and Speed Racer will get re-releases with lossless audio as well. Do not expect any deals from Warner because they are going to make as much money as possible off the consumer.

All you EE fans are just going to have to wait for a couple years. I love the LOTR trilogy so I will be picking up the TE version's at the end of this year and the EE version's when they come out.

Warner is all about making money first and then the consumer. If it is even in that order. Good example would be the push back of Harry Potter 6. Dark Knight made them so much money last year that they knew this year would be tough for them without a big blockbuster on there schedule. HP6 was pushed back until July of this year and that movie will put them in the blue for the year. If they really cared about the consumer they would of released HP6 last November. It is all business and as long as the consumer Keeps filling there pockets with money you can expect this from Warner forever.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 05:57 PM   #1452
Mike2060 Mike2060 is offline
Banned
 
Feb 2009
19
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluBrown View Post
Not to sound like I'm "whining" but why couldn't they release both versions now with seamless branching just as they did with the most recent SD releases and then years down the road release the Super Ultimate Deluxe edition boxset to coincide with The Hobbit. I'm sure there is enough unreleased material to get the real hard core fans (myself included) to double dip on a definitive blu-ray collection.
What is seamless branching?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 06:02 PM   #1453
AintNoSin AintNoSin is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
AintNoSin's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
Above the Convenience Store
136
594
299
212
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike2060 View Post
What is seamless branching?
Seamless branching
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 06:13 PM   #1454
BluBrown BluBrown is offline
Power Member
 
BluBrown's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Feeling Minnesota!
15
50
1201
56
15
14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AintNoSin View Post
I hate to repeat myself.

We will not have to wait 3 years for the EE on Blu. Jackson only said that they will be released "closer" to the release date of The Hobbit, not "close to" or at the same time.

My guess, based on nothing more than it being how I would handle it. They'd probably release the EEs separately and not in a box set. FOTR would come two years to eighteen months before the release of The Hobbit, it would contain the first available footage from the new films. The next two films would follow 6 to 9 month apart, each containing a new and expanded Hobbit trailer.

If we see a box set, my bet would be a combined Hobbit/LOTR set contain both versions of all movies (because you just know there will be EE versions of The Hobbit movies too, right?).
Not saying you're wrong at all(I actually hope you're right) but why wouldn't they do the same with the TE's knowing full well that they would prpobably make a few extra dollars?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 06:55 PM   #1455
ckenisell ckenisell is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
ckenisell's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Round Rock, TX
368
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AintNoSin View Post
A couple of other examples are Spiderman 2 (and 2.1) on the same disc and Close Encounters of the Third Kind (with three different versions on disc.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:15 PM   #1456
Variable Variable is offline
Special Member
 
Variable's Avatar
 
Mar 2008
Northern New Jersey
12
Default

maybe they're waiting on the other ones so they can put some new features in... I assume you'll be forgiving of Warner if that's the case?

It's not unheard of for them to make the customer wait for a product either. They don't owe you anything, and they want your money. if they wanted they could have said there will be no EE released on blu just to get people to buy the standard. Not that I think that would be a smart move, I'm just saying, what they are doing is justified solely by the fact that they want money, just like it was with the first releases, let alone that there may be extra content.

bleh. I hate to sound like I'm defending warner but it just seems like there's always some people who are unhappy. but I guess you can't please all the people all the time... I also don't want to sound atagonistic towards those who are unhappy about this, I do understand where you're coming from. maybe I'm just so happy about lotr coming out at all on blu that I don't care about the circumstances of the release.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:20 PM   #1457
mdm1699 mdm1699 is offline
Special Member
 
mdm1699's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
NJ
9
Default

I hope the EEs are released in 2020
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:22 PM   #1458
Steve46 Steve46 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Steve46's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Oshawa, ON
156
1040
79
16
Default

The most important thing is that they get the PQ and AQ right.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:47 PM   #1459
Diesel Diesel is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
Diesel's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
-
-
-
-
31
10
Default

this thread has quickly become split since the pre-order went up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve46 View Post
The most important thing is that they get the PQ and AQ right.
EXACTLY
that is what is the most important imo
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2009, 07:53 PM   #1460
Batman1980 Batman1980 is offline
Blu-ray Jedi
 
Feb 2009
District 13
8
146
394
57
22
48
Send a message via AIM to Batman1980
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel View Post
this thread has quickly become split since the pre-order went up



EXACTLY
that is what is the most important imo
Sub par in both that still beat the DVDs are fine by me.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Lord of the rings trilogy Retail/Shopping Smadawho 9 03-31-2010 04:17 PM
Lord of the rings (il signore degli anelli) - 6/04/2010 Italy El_Burro 1 02-17-2010 09:33 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.