Bill Maher is 'Religulous'

[jadedeath]

Originally Posted by xtop

thats what i meant. evolution can be real and still have religion. the presence or lack of evolution changes nothing imo

Bingo, we have a winner.

If God is all powerful and all seeing and all knowing, why would he just slap some mud together and say "Hey! it's a HUMAN taDA!" He'd probably work a little more subtle than being the Criss Angel of the Universe.

Logan

[scrumptious]

Originally Posted by jadedeath

Bingo, we have a winner.

If God is all powerful and all seeing and all knowing, why would he just slap some mud together and say "Hey! it's a HUMAN taDA!" He'd probably work a little more subtle than being the Criss Angel of the Universe.

Logan

So, a god would scrub the universe of all scientific evidence of his existence ...? The more powerful a force is the more clear the evidence should be of its existence. If a god is a force that is at work everywhere and at all times, the evidence for the god should be staring in every scientists' face ... but the scientific models work just as well without a god, or better, than with a god.

[jadedeath]

Originally Posted by scrumptious

So, a god would scrub the universe of all scientific evidence of his existence ...? The more powerful a force is the more clear the evidence should be of its existence. If a god is a force that is at work everywhere and at all times, the evidence for the god should be staring in every scientists' face ... but the scientific models work just as well without a god, or better, than with a god.

God possibly put all those things in motion. Gravity, physics, etc.

Why would it have to slap you in the face like a c**k in order for you to admit that it's there?

You can't see, taste, or touch gravity, but you know it's there.

And this is coming from the guy that's not religious.

Logan