|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $35.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $35.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.00 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $42.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.48 | ![]() $54.49 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Originally posted by RLSMITH on avsforums..
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Guru
May 2006
|
![]()
i really do think bill is a fair reviewer and reporter of news in the industry. he has done well to reserve his criticisms knowing the build quality of some companies as well as noting the shortfalls that everyone has experienced. assuming that what bill wrote has not been manipulated or anything, i like the direction that things are heading.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I've been saying all along that the problems with the movies weren't mpeg2 but the master tapes. I've said this before "Sony didn't become the king of video by being blind" Blu disc is a champion format, now Sony just has to figure out how to deliver what we like to see (cleaned up masters), vs.. transparency to fugly masters.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
I'm thrilled to hear that Sony didn't like the bad reviews of their earlier BD titles. It's clear that they're already taking steps to improve their discs with great reviews like those that Tears Of The Sun has gotten. Yep there's no mistaking it, Sony is gearing up to do what they should have done from the getgo, kicked HD DVD's ass!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Member
Jun 2006
Los Angeles,CA
|
![]()
Yeah I really like bill too and think he is very good at reviewing both at saying whats true but doing it in an unbiased way and just really laying down the facts. I can't wait for these big announcements and it doesn't surprise me that some of the discs didn't look that great simply because with hi-def like bill siad there is a lot more room to notice the flaws.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Site Manager
|
![]() Quote:
In any case I saw TFE disc displayed optimally on a 768p display (570 x 1366 effective image resolution) and it looked fairly well compared to a 35mm average theatrical projection. A 1080p transfer (804 x 1920 effective image resolution) redone from the original Super35 negative would probably surpass the average theater presentation easily if done correctly ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Guru
Sep 2006
|
![]() Quote:
I like Bill Hunt. But when it comes to TFE, I too believe that they used something other than the original master. There was far too much dirt in the print. Certainly much more than in the DVD transfer(s). Bill almost seems to imply that the HD format revealed these specs of dirt, where they were hidden by the SD DVD. I don't believe that to be the case at all. Those dirt specs would have easily been seen on the SD DVD as well. They simply weren't there. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Member
Jun 2006
Los Angeles,CA
|
![]()
Yeah my guess is that they got lazy and didn't feel like remastering the whole movie for what they viewed as minimal sales and so said oh well screw it and just transfered it over without really working too hard on it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Guru
Sep 2006
|
![]()
That makes as much sense as anything else. We just need to keep the pressure on so that attitude changes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Jan 2005
|
![]()
My guess is a little bit different. I think the entire industry got caught a bit behind the curve on things and fully expected more delays and potentially releasing Blu-ray a bit later in the year. They were rushed and simply didn't have the time to do things perfectly when the first movies came along. The early encoding software wasn't fully tweaked to perfection and for whatever reason hadn't been put nearly through the paces that HD-DVD encoding software had been to that point.
Perhaps a bit to cocky on the part of Blu-ray, it was a clear wake-up call when initial reviews seriously panned the Blu-ray format. I think it is very fair that it only took a couple of months for Blu-ray to get things under much tighter control and quality of movies to go through the roof. It does suprise me to some extent how far quality has jumped with MPEG2 on 25GB discs, but clearly MPEG2 + 25GB IS possible for very high quality. I long to see what MPEG2 + 50GB can deliver! I am psyched that all three major codecs are in use with Blu-ray and that all are delivering very good results. I figure that in a year comments on the quality difference between the formats will be non-existent and hopefully PS3 will inspire Universal to make the Blu-ray studio lineup complete. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Hat off to Bill Hunt | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | HeavyHitter | 1 | 01-10-2008 04:44 AM |
Bill Hunt is such a tease | General Chat | radagast | 1 | 11-16-2007 01:49 PM |
Bill Hunt said it best.... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | spam.curitiba | 156 | 11-05-2007 06:09 AM |
|
|