|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $22.49 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $23.79 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $22.49 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1001 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1002 | |
Member
Jul 2009
|
![]() Quote:
Other than that, you are pretty much correct for the most part. You can get a "diminished signal" that still produce a picture; however, it will introduce artifact in the picture. Most receiving units can correct these signals and if they can't, they just give up and no picture shows. Cr00zng |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1003 |
Expert Member
Jan 2009
Hartford, CT
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1004 | |
Expert Member
Jan 2009
Hartford, CT
|
![]() Quote:
I actually rock a good number of their analog joints, and have seen how going from a sub-standard analog cable to their offering has made a huge difference in quality. I just can't get past how much money they (AND retailers) rape people for in HDMI land. It's as if they sat down during the inception of HDMI and said "hey - let's take what we charge for a high-end component video set, add that to what we charge for a high-end 7.1 analog set, and slap a price on the HDMI...after all, it DOES do ALL of that." And THAT, in my humble opinion, is the main reason they've gotten away with it for so long. ONE cable does it all, so OF COURSE it cost a lot. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1005 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1006 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1007 |
Super Moderator
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1008 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Legitimate marketing is one thing, but the deceptive marketing by Monster (IMO), boarders false advertising. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1009 |
Member
|
![]()
my friend recently passed me a brand-new Monster Ultra 600 cable that he didnt need and on the back of the packaging it says compatible up to 720p/1080i but NOWHERE does it state anything about 1080p..
monster-hating aside.. will this cable be actually able to transmit 1080p resolution? i've heard that non-rated Monster cables like these ones usually have bandwiths of up to 2.23 Gbps only.. btw, anyone heard of brands such as Atake Silis Edworks HDMI Labs Draco and care to comment? |
![]() |
![]() |
#1010 |
Member
|
![]()
it all makes sense now.. haha.
i checked out the website of a brand selling at the store near my home and this is what it put: http://www.atake.com/html/product/HDMI.html Features ATake Super High Resolution HDMI and DVI cables offer impeccable digital image quality at all HDTV resolutions including 1080p with cable lengths up to 49.5 feet. Eliminates unnecessary signal conversions. Supports standard, enhanced, or high-definition video at 24 bits/pixel, 165MHz max clock frequency. Supports up to 8 channel digital audio on a single cable eliminating costly A/D signal conversions. Offers Bi-directional control signal transfer. Offers 5 Gbps bandwidth, 55% spared for future expansion. Offers 1 simple, user-friendly connector. Backward compatible to DVI hot plug enabled assemblies up to 5 meters in length. Per HDMI standard, HDTV sent as 16x9 & SDTV as 4x3 over 30 AWG 100 ohm, .5 amp, 500 VAC DWV double shielded cable. Long Lengths available, ATC tested up to 12M and up to 40 M when using EQ technology. Never have i seen a website so honest and reliable in its specs ![]() well well.. anyway there have been tests/reviews of other hdmi cables with bandwidths of 2.23 Gbps upwards that show virtually similar A/V quality as the Monster ones right? Last edited by reyz; 07-15-2009 at 06:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1011 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
This post is a little more accurate: 1080p60 8bit colour: 2200 * 1125 = 2475000 number of pixels (Horizontal Resolution + Hblank * Vertical Resolution + VBlank) 2475000 * 30 = 74250000 (8-bit color - travelling in a 10-bit word length x 3 channels) 74250000 * 60 = 4455000000 (60 frames per second) (4.46 Gbps) Of course I'd bet $100 that the low-end Monster Cable would capably pass 1080p60 12-bit colour no problem at all and based on Gizmodo, Audioholics, etc., testing I'd be right. So please don't quote that post anymore because it makes me look like an idiot, haha. ![]() Last edited by dobyblue; 07-15-2009 at 06:57 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1013 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
1080p60 signal through 100ft of unamplified HDMI cable...impossible?
Nope, Belden cable and Blue Jeans Cable did it last week!! http://www.audioholics.com/news/indu...er-hdmi-record Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1014 | |
Member
Jul 2009
|
![]() Quote:
In any case, for 20 bucks one can have a six feet HDMI cable with the 28AWG bonded pair. Or, just buy the Monster cable for 100 Bucks, it's good to have choices... ![]() Cr00zng |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1015 |
Member
Jul 2009
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1016 | |
Expert Member
Jan 2009
Hartford, CT
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1017 | |
Member
Jul 2009
|
![]() Quote:
I've got a couple of BJC Series-F2 Belden Bonded-Pair HDMI Cables 6' (28 AWG) last week that replaced Monoprice cables. With my system neither the BD's nor the cable box' PQ looked noticeably different. Other than the $15 per cable difference in pricing that is ![]() BJC delivers really good cables and that's why I went with them. Yes, I know... overkill... ![]() Cr00zng |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1018 |
Expert Member
Jan 2009
Hartford, CT
|
![]()
Over the weekend, on the new display, I noticed a lot of grain and some sparkles in Lord of War. I had really flexed the end of my Belden Series 1 from BJC when I hung the V10, as the inputs are lower, and I tilt down, and I hadn't discovered the 90 degree HDMI adapter yet.
ANYWAY, I went straight to BB to find out for myself, with my eyes. I put down $130 for the Monster Cable THX1000 8' HDMI. Went home. Connected it. The grain was worse. Needless to say, BB owns the cable again (fantastic return policy, that BB). Now this certainly illustrates further the benefit to avoiding Monster Cable, but if truly all 1s and 0s, why did the cable actually make a visible difference, if only for the worse? Oh, and the grain and sparkles were in the movie itself. I figured as much, but whatever. Last edited by xneox; 07-22-2009 at 04:50 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1019 | |
Member
Jul 2009
|
![]() Quote:
Cr00zng |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1020 | |
Expert Member
Jan 2009
Hartford, CT
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
HDMI Cables - What to do now? | Home Theater General Discussion | Doughoef | 15 | 05-27-2014 10:31 AM |
will hdmi 1.3 cables fit any/all hdmi inputs? | Home Theater General Discussion | zoon_ii | 3 | 10-23-2007 05:46 PM |
Hdmi Cables | Home Theater General Discussion | BOBBY | 1 | 07-07-2007 10:13 PM |
|
|