Is Warner changing to DTS-HD Master Audio too?

[BozQ]

Originally Posted by Hunter

Not a valid comparison, the Star Trek Movies are 7.1 that's why the bit rate is higher.

+1 to BozQ, it's lossless so it really doesn't matter what the bit rate is in the end, actually less of a bit rate is better since it's saving space and "lossless".

I have no idea where he got the 15Mbps for the audio.
Assuming the Star Trek films he's referring to are Dolby TrueHD 7.1, 24-bit, 48kHz.

Then LPCM 7.1, 24-bit, 48kHz is only 9216kbps or roughly 9.2Mbps. So how exactly did he get 15Mbps?

Also, assuming that was a genuine typo mistake on his part, and he meant 1.5Mbps, it still doesn't prove anything whether the audio quality is better or worse than DTS-HD. Dolby TrueHD is a full quality track on its own, unlike DTS-HD which uses a Core+Extension form of compression. So that would explain the differences in file sizes.

But it still doesn't mean DTS MA is better than Dolby TrueHD.
*breathes in*
*breathes out*
Not directing at you Hunter.