Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Papageorgio
Ive only seen 13, but it looks pretty bad to me. HEAVY dnr. I know some people don't mind but I compared back to back layered directly on top of each other and the brand new 4K blu is noticeably softer than the old VC-1 encoded blu. Given the VC-1 encode comes in around 15gb and the 4K HEVC blu is over 60, the fact that the latter is softer isn't acceptable to me. The reviewer who reviewed this release on here forgot to mention this as well. Whether the dnr bothers you or not is of course up to whomever is watching, but i certainly think it's worth noting. The color is noticeably better though. It's a little less red than the VC-1 with slightly reduced contrast. Still overly warm for me but slightly better. Im sadly sticking to my VC-1 blu as much of a bummer as it is. I haven't compared 11 or 12 yet so i can't say how those compare but since they were all supervised im gonna guess it's the same deal. Hopefully im wrong.
|
Where’s your screenshots? Isn’t that how you fools show proof of DNR? I think Ocean’s 11 looked the best, the others look well very old school, but hardly any grain but how do you think it’s the dreaded DNR! I don’t buy it or this thread would go crazy! This post feels like oh there’s hardly any grain so it’s “heavy” DNR.