As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
8 hrs ago
Wallace & Gromit: The Complete Cracking Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$13.99
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
27 min ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.52
 
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-27-2025, 04:53 PM   #1
apricissimus apricissimus is offline
Senior Member
 
apricissimus's Avatar
 
Sep 2022
64
250
41
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warm Gun View Post
Ben-Hur with its extreme width of 2.76:1 would be far more impressive on a 21:9 TV. You wouldn't be squinting as much.
I didn't have to squint at all on my 55" 4K TV that I bought for $360.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2025, 05:01 PM   #2
Warm Gun Warm Gun is online now
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Warm Gun's Avatar
 
Dec 2020
127
650
103
2
10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apricissimus View Post
I didn't have to squint at all on my 55" 4K TV that I bought for $360.
The filmmakers intended it to take up most of your field of view, which doesn't work when your display width is so narrow that it shrinks the picture. Your experience with Ben-Hur was compromised by the 1.78 prioritization for fullscreen content.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2025, 05:06 PM   #3
apricissimus apricissimus is offline
Senior Member
 
apricissimus's Avatar
 
Sep 2022
64
250
41
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warm Gun View Post
The filmmakers intended it to take up most of your field of view, which doesn't work when your display width is so narrow that it shrinks the picture. Your experience with Ben-Hur was compromised by the 1.78 prioritization for fullscreen content.
I saw it big, and in the correct aspect ratio. And in 1080p. That's good enough for me.

Standard TV dimensions are a good compromise for accommodating a variety of aspect ratios (and for actually fitting in people's living rooms).
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 AM.