Harry Potter titles

[DetroitSportsFan]

Originally Posted by teacher_man99

IMO, WB is just seeing how sales go this holiday season to see if they want to continue with Blu-ray.

IMO, I see it as the opposite.

They're going to see if it's worth their while to continue with HD-DVD.

Why would they stop making what they're selling more of?

[teacher_man99]

Originally Posted by DetroitSportsFan

IMO, I see it as the opposite.

They're going to see if it's worth their while to continue with HD-DVD.

Why would they stop making what they're selling more of?

Detroit,

I thought the same thing in the past. In a sad memory of mine, I remember somebody posting about a week before the Paramount/Dreamworks deal "What if Blu-ray lost one of these studios..." (or something like that) and I, full of Blu-ray bravado, replied back "What if.." and something stupid... Yeah, I felt very stupid a week later when I came home and had my blu-ass handed to me by Paramount & Dreamworks. Who saw that coming, other than a few insiders (thanks much to all they contribute)? I see and hear a lot of anti-Sony out there on the net and in person. I know Sony is all of BDA, but the sentiment is there and that's worth looking at. As I said, it's just an opinion, like a gut-feeling... but that could just be the lingering effects of shock. There's a lot to happen this quarter and into the first of 2008.

[BadAss]

But Paramount don't sell anything like what WB sells. Paramount sunk alot of money into the original Star Trek series and I see that loosing alot of money. I think Paramount chose the easy/lazy way out for 18 months while the BDA sort their Profile 1.1 players and optimize Java software.

Cheap players, HDi and $150,000,000 in the bank or what ever they got paid was a soft sell IMO.