As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$21.31
7 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
1 day ago
U-571 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
13 hrs ago
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
1 day ago
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
8 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Serenity 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.79
8 hrs ago
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
1 day ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
1 day ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2010, 01:09 AM   #2701
rkolinski rkolinski is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
rkolinski's Avatar
 
May 2008
184
76
3078
17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhiggy23 View Post
Btw, Squiddy, I'm 40 minutes into Triangle and on the edge of my seat.
Please let me know if this is worth a blind buy or just a rent (or should I wait until it's on Dish HD). I hadn't heard of of the film until your post.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 01:40 AM   #2702
SquidPuppet SquidPuppet is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Club Loop
277
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkolinski View Post
Well, I guess we have to disagree on this point but that is what makes life interesting, especially the debate. I will admit to you that I initially liked The Boy in the Striped Pajamas a lot (I think it would be a great tool in a high school classroom so long as other films or documentaries were used, as well as the original source book, The Diary of Anne Frank ,etc.) but the more I viewed it, the more it bothered me, as did my viewing of The Reader. I'll just throw out a sample of articles critical of The Boy in the Striped Pajamas so you'll see that I'm not the only one who has problems with the film.

http://movies.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/movies/07paja.html

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...g/6099373.html

http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainmen...91F183CDCA890D

http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago...lm?oid=1054736

I also noticed that the novel is Amazon's 'Top 10 Irish Books of the Decade' and "[t]he release of the Amazon top 10 yesterday upstaged the Irish Book Awards' online vote to find its own 'Irish Book of the Decade'. See: http://www.independent.ie/national-n...e-2198129.html

Again, I'm not saying the movie is total trash but I really do have a problem with revisionist history, especially when it begins to focus on those other than the true victims of the Holocaust!
I must have seen a different movie. The one I saw showed the nazi propaganda films used to lie to the Jews about the camps and lure them there. It showed the jews being forced to do labor and live in vile conditions. It showed the Jews being starved. It showed the Jews ill and beaten. And it Showed the Jews being murdered. They showed in detail the methodical process of gassing them. If someone watches that movie and feels any degree of sympathy for the father....well they have more than one screw loose. It shows something very bad happening to a Nazi. Something you wouldnt wish on any parent. But sympathy for him? I had none.



I read the first review you linked from the NY Times, and I have to say that I cant respect that reviewer. He is certainly entitled to his opinions, but his style is distastefull. The entire piece is childish, negative sarcasm. He makes no real points, he just makes fun (insults). The article thrashes the Boy for pondering why the Jewish boy wasnt evil as he had been told all Jews were. I think thats probably 100% natural. Hes a very young boy whos potential transformation into an evil Nazi has yet to happen. I think painting every German child as definite future Nazi is wreckless.

I'll read the others because maybe they will better describe a nuance that perhaps I missed.

But so far, I'm sticking to my guns.

Edit: From the third article...

"Not fair, me being stuck here on my own while you're over there, playing with friends all day," says Bruno.

And: "What do you burn in those chimneys? Is it just hay and stuff?"

And, "Perhaps you can come and have supper with us?"

Nazi kids - they say the darnedest things.


Do I even need to explain how wrongheaded that is? At 8 years old has he joined the Party? Does he even know what the Party is? Can he even understand it? Does he know what going on in the camp? Yet he's a Nazi. Makes me wonder how educated some of these critics actually are when it comes to WWII and the Holocaust.

Last edited by SquidPuppet; 05-30-2010 at 02:30 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 01:54 AM   #2703
SquidPuppet SquidPuppet is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Club Loop
277
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhiggy23 View Post
Btw, Squiddy, I'm 40 minutes into Triangle and on the edge of my seat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkolinski View Post
Please let me know if this is worth a blind buy or just a rent (or should I wait until it's on Dish HD). I hadn't heard of of the film until your post.


I never recommend a blind buy, however, I loved having my brain wrung out like a wet dish towel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 02:29 AM   #2704
rkolinski rkolinski is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
rkolinski's Avatar
 
May 2008
184
76
3078
17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet View Post
I must have seen a different movie.

But so far, I'm sticking to my guns.
I wouldn't have it any other way and I hope you don't think I was attacking you personally or was trying to change your mind. With my last post with the links, I was only demonstrating that there is more than one view about this film. Regarding the NY Times article, I not only read the article but I also read every posted comment below it by those who read her article. Some of the posters blasted the writer outright, some blasted the style used but not the premise and there were some who wholeheartedly agreed. I don't fall into any of those camps. I can see your argument (because I enjoyed the movie and would purchase it on BD if it came out) but I just wanted you to see there is another argument. That's all really; no personal attack intended at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 02:37 AM   #2705
SquidPuppet SquidPuppet is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Club Loop
277
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkolinski View Post
I wouldn't have it any other way and I hope you don't think I was attacking you personally or was trying to change your mind. With my last post with the links, I was only demonstrating that there is more than one view about this film. Regarding the NY Times article, I not only read the article but I also read every posted comment below it by those who read her article. Some of the posters blasted the writer outright, some blasted the style used but not the premise and there were some who wholeheartedly agreed. I don't fall into any of those camps. I can see your argument (because I enjoyed the movie and would purchase it on BD if it came out) but I just wanted you to see there is another argument. That's all really; no personal attack intended at all.
Didnt percieve it that way at all. Ever. Just good discussion.

And I do realize that others view it differently than I do. My point is simply that they are wrong.

I added to my previous post a comment about the third article.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 03:56 AM   #2706
rkolinski rkolinski is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
rkolinski's Avatar
 
May 2008
184
76
3078
17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet View Post
Didnt percieve it that way at all. Ever. Just good discussion.

And I do realize that others view it differently than I do. My point is simply that they are wrong.

I added to my previous post a comment about the third article.
I just found this article (it's written by David Cesarani, whose books include "Eichmann: His Life and Crimes;" his next book, "Major Farran's Hat: Britain's War Against Jewish Terrorism, 1945-1948", will be published in March by Heinemann) and I just thought I'd throw it out here. Again, I'm not trying to change your views but I don't think mine are necessarily incorrect either. This is from the Literary Review in the UK. In advance, I'm not saying this guy is correct but I think his review is nicely written and thought out (as are yours).

http://www.literaryreview.co.uk/cesarani_10_08.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 08:02 AM   #2707
Al_The_Strange Al_The_Strange is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Al_The_Strange's Avatar
 
Apr 2009
Out there...past them trees...
126
1144
4961
530
1013
132
32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhiggy23 View Post
Chaplin is a good but not great film. Solid 3 stars but nothing more. The writing and directing are iffy, but its def worth seeing for Downey Jr's incredible performance. It does differ from history a decent amount.
I'm going to have to read up on Chaplin's history. Not to mention, watch more of his movies!

RDJ gave a fine performance, certainly. And I was surprised as to how many other good actors appeared (Dan Aykroyd, Anthony Hopkins, etc).

I liked the film's direction, and didn't mind the writing. But I agree that it's not perfect, just good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhiggy23 View Post
I'm not a fan of Indiana Jones.
Whaaaat?

Ah, they are kinda silly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 08:16 AM   #2708
Al_The_Strange Al_The_Strange is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Al_The_Strange's Avatar
 
Apr 2009
Out there...past them trees...
126
1144
4961
530
1013
132
32
Default

Got around to watching "The Road." It was mostly background viewing while I catalogued my CDs, but I paid attention to most of it, and I can tell that it's mostly similar to what I remember from the novel. Something about the book's style and prose really had an impact on me, and I don't think the same impact exists on film. But it is certainly an atmospheric and grim film, with fantastically bleak imagery and some decent emotional resonance. I liked the characters (if anything, I think the boy and his father show a little stronger chemistry on film than in the book). The story is decent fundamentally, and it inherently invokes some thought about the apocalypse and humanity in general.

Yep, it's bleak stuff, and it has met all my expectations. My only gripe is somewhat slow pacing (still not too bad though).

4/5 (entertainment: 4/5, story: 4/5, film: 4.5/5, i/e: 3/5 atm).
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 10:15 AM   #2709
LordoftheRings LordoftheRings is offline
Special Member
 
LordoftheRings's Avatar
 
Mar 2010
Portishead ♫
Default Spider-Man 3.

Audio: 3.75/5
Video: 4/5
Movie: 2/5

* On Blu-ray of course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 11:12 AM   #2710
Al_The_Strange Al_The_Strange is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Al_The_Strange's Avatar
 
Apr 2009
Out there...past them trees...
126
1144
4961
530
1013
132
32
Default

More background viewing during chores:

"Battlestar Galactica: The Plan." Would probably be confusing for folks not familiar with the series. Action and SFX did not dissapoint, as usual. Drama and suspense were plentiful. the story overall presented some fascinating insight and background to the events of the series. It's cool.

4/5 (entertainment: 4/5, story: 4/5, film: 4/5)

"Valhalla Rising." This smilie shall represent my overall impression of this film....

It has bloody action, but in between the fight scenes it's mostly quiet, strange, and lacking in tangible substance. It is well-filmed, with lots of wonderful imagery and camera angles. Acting seems good. But there's hardly any dialogue, and zero exposition, so I have no real idea what this film is even about. Story is weak. But I am wondering if most of this is meant to be a figurative journey through heaven and hell (or rather, Valhalla and Hel)? It's just plain damn weird.

2.5/5 (entertainment: 2/5, story: 1/5, film: 4.5/5)

Blu-Rays for both of these looked decent (albiet a bit noisy) and sounded superb (although "Valhalla Rising" has a lot of low parts).
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 11:37 AM   #2711
JLant19 JLant19 is offline
Power Member
 
JLant19's Avatar
 
Sep 2009
629
1647
27
7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkolinski View Post
I agree and it happens to be one of a number of recent acquisitions where I got so engrossed in the film that PQ and AQ were not important for me.
Yea you are completely right. Never a dull moment in this film.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 02:43 PM   #2712
surfdude12 surfdude12 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
surfdude12's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Club Loop
343
112
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet View Post
I just finished this. I stopped half way through a few days ago and was going to abandon it, but I read your post and decided to finish it. It had too much of a Roman Polanski pedo-perv vibe to it for me. The camera spent 140 minutes figuratively undressing an 17 year old girl and boy...and then they literally DID! I got the feeling that it wasnt done for the story, but for the pleasure of the filmmakers "in the name of art" . Dont get me wrong, I am fine with nudity in films when its used correctly. This just had that creepy pedo vibe.
I understand this perspective, but this may say more about Squids (healthy, might I add) anti-perdo bias than about the film itself. It is what it is. I'll admit that my anti-perdo alarm didn't go off. I guess the facts of the film made the camera direction realistic: 16 year old dude in a thong + 17 year old chick in a prep school uniform (who has likely been repressed anything beyond a PG film to this point) = LOTSA LOOKIN My underlying reaction was "yeah, that would be happening (the frequent looks)" rather than "these directors are ___ ", I guess it all comes down to whether you think its plausible, and if so, I can't see the directors being culpable in any way for showing it (or using artistic style to show the intensity of it).

Quote:
I agree with your ideas about its themes.
Actually, I think I only touched the surface. As Ebert said, the film isn't so much about
[Show spoiler]the actual events depicted, but about miscommunication, and how willing are we as humans to go outside our comfort zone to communicate with another, in an effort to connect. This is a very powerful theme. It happens everyday, not just on a Walkabout. Some rich dude refuses to step outside his comfort zone, and sit down and talk to a homeless guy for an hour, to communicate with him. Same with racial barriers, language barriers, etc. It explains why as you pointed out earlier, why the kids weren't upset when they saw the aborigine dead (actually they were disturbed somewhat: the boy offered him something, but didn't understand death, and girl wipes ants from his chest), why the mating dance wasn't answered, and the haunting scene of the aborigine watching the girl cry with the photo. I think we both overestimated how much they had connected with him. In fact, the girl just saw the aborigine as a means to help them survive, nothing more, because she wasn't willing to go outside her comfort zone in an effort to communicate on a meaningful level. The boy tried somewhat, but not to any significant extent, which is why both he and her weren't emotionally moved when they saw him dead. The aborigine is guilty too, as it cost him his life. Theoretically, he could have put forth the effort and figured out that all he needed to do was say "wanna fu*k?" All they knew is what they knew, based on their lack of communication. Remember that they just saw him doing this crazy dance, and wouldn't come out of the house, they didn't know if he was going to kill him, they thought he'd gone loopy. All of this explains the lack of emotion when he was dead. It matters not that he "saved" them, as in their minds he'd gone nuts. Plus, he was merely a "hunting guide" of sorts to them, not a friend or buddy, because of the lack of communication


Quote:
I didnt care for the way they did the back and forth cuts when
[Show spoiler]she was swimming and the boy was killing all those animals. It felt so forced ... Like LOOK...SEEE... OPPOSITES...calm pretty serenity vs brutal death. I get it.
Again, I think this may say more about your astuteness than the film itself. I didn't have that reaction.
[Show spoiler] some of those flashbacks were great, I thought, such as the butcher knife and the aborigine cutting the kill: MAN HASN'T CHANGED, as Ebert put it. Without those cuts, I wouldn't have seen it. Perhaps you're complaining that they were excessive, and that's a possibility, but overall I loved the direction/cinematography


Quote:
I need your thoughts on this. When the boy painted himself all up and put on all the feathers and danced for her,
[Show spoiler]I am guessing that was a mating ritual. He was asking her to be his mate, and because she ignored/refused, thats why he killed himself. And, do you have any idea how he killed himself? He didnt look like he hung himself.
yeah still not sure on this, i'll have to watch it again.

Quote:
I found it way too odd that when their Dad
[Show spoiler]killed himself in the begining that the brother and sister never freaked out, never wept, never discussed it...they just walked away. I thought that was super weird. And the same thing when the boy killed himself. That kid had pretty much saved their lives and returned them to their "road" and they just looked at his corpse like it was a kangaroo. There had been a lot of serious bonding in the prior days. Why didnt they cry? Seems like they should have been crying their eyes out. They were so cold and detached from it. If they were trying to make her look like a cold evil white person, then why did she have that fond dream of him at the very end?
Great point here Squid! Ebert made a great point on this:
[Show spoiler] at the beginning, the girl and bro are in the pool at the house, the Dad is upstairs in the kitchen, walks out and looks down at them, the wife is detached from him and we can eerily sense that something is off with this family. We only know what we know. The dad was an alcoholic (I think?) so their may be a history of abuse (especially if he just starts shooting at them). Honestly, would you be upset if you were those kids? They did discuss something about the dads death later on, I think, but it was brief, and I agree that their demeneor was unusually calm. I'll give you that. But I guess everyone responds to trauma differently, and we don't know what this dad's history is with them. What we do know is he shot at them, so I'll confidently assume that he's done much worse to them in the past when he's drank. Regarding the aborigine boy, as discussed above, you hit the nail on the head here: they were detached, and this is the point of the film! I'm sensing that you are rating the film based on your rating of the characters? Or the plausibility of the characters? or both? To me, their reaction to the aborigine underscores the unwillingness to communicate, and hence it just highlights the main theme. But I can understand if you go the route of deducting from the film b/c you don't think the characters actions were plausible, despite the miscommunication. To me, I just don't know what's plausible, as I'm not them.


Quote:
Why were the weather scientists in the movie?
No clue, I think they are just another
[Show spoiler] prop/example of the white man's presence, or rather the varied presence of the white man (profiting off statutes, sending out weather balloons) and how this is vastly dissimilar from the timeless unchanging culture of the aborigine. great contrast


Quote:
Another question. When their dad
[Show spoiler]killed himself, why did they wander into the boonies? Why didnt they follow the tire tracks going back the direction from where they came?
LOL! I love this post. Again, this may just show how you
[Show spoiler] (very appropriately, might I add) are pretty strict that everything must pass "plausibility muster." I do it too, but tend to be less rigid than you I believe (for better or worse). A 17 y.o chick and 10? year old kid backtracking the tire tracks? hmmm, I'd give that a 50-50 shot. Now if it was a 17 year old boy...


But overall, I loved the film, even more so after reading Ebert's review (which I don't recommend people do until after they've seen the film). I understand your points about it and share many, but the themes overpower them.

Last edited by surfdude12; 05-30-2010 at 02:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 03:13 PM   #2713
AKORIS AKORIS is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
AKORIS's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Beautiful Pacific Northwest
660
3645
19
Default

watched a few the past few days--

LAW ABIDING CITIZEN-- love revenge/vigilante films and this one had a few different spins to the genre-- Butler was great and 80% of the movie I was really enjoying it. The ending left me cold though not just because of the outcome but I thought it was way too easy for the "law" to end the killings.

rating 3.0 out of 5.0 (good)


VERTICAL LIMIT-- haven't seen this one in awhile-- first of all I was very impressed with the blu-ray-- great picture. The movie is actually quite exciting in spots, but drags in others. Could have used about 20 minutes or so of trimming. Overall a good film though with some spectacular suspense sequences as well as scenery.

3.0 out of 5.0


STAR TREK--GENERATIONS -- I don't know I think this film doesn't get the love it deserves--- it's my favorite New Generation Trek behind FIRST CONTACT. I thought the story was interesting, it had some unexpected emotional scenes that were well done, there's that spectacular crash of the Enterprise, Malcolm McDowall is always fun to see, etc etc.. Really enjoyed seeing it again--

4.0 of of 5.0 (very good)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 04:50 PM   #2714
Freekman Freekman is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Freekman's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
New York
7
109
2
Default

Prince of Persia - 3/5
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 05:22 PM   #2715
GreenScar GreenScar is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
GreenScar's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
148
2
Default

Taking Chance

Missed the first 30 minutes of the film on HBO, but it was a movie I knew little about but wanted to see. This is an HBO production. It's riveting.

The official synopsis:

In April 2004, Lieutenant Colonel Michael Strobl, USMC, came across the name of 19-year-old Lance Corporal Chance Phelps, a young Marine who had been killed by hostile fire in Al Anbar Province, Iraq. Strobl, a Desert Storm veteran, requested that he be assigned for military escort duty to accompany Chance's remains to his family in Dubois, Wyo.

Witnessing the spontaneous outpouring of support and respect for the fallen Marine- from the groundskeepers he passed along the road to the cargo handlers at the airport - Strobl was moved to capture the experience in his personal journal. His first-person account, which began as an official trip report, gives an insight into the military's policy of providing a uniformed escort for all casualties. The story became an Internet phenomenon when it was widely circulated throughout the military community and eventually reached the mainstream media.

Taking Chance chronicles one of the silent, virtually unseen journeys that takes place every day across the country, bearing witness to the fallen and all of those who, literally and figuratively, carry them home. A uniquely non-political film about the war in Iraq, the film pays tribute to all of the men and women who have given their lives in the military service as well as their families.

An HBO Films presentation of a Motion Picture Corporation of America and Civil Dawn Pictures production, Taking Chance marks the directorial debut of two time Oscar nominated producer Ross Katz (Lost in Translation). The screenplay is by Lt. Col Micheal R. Strobl, USMC (Ret.) and Ross Katz, based on the journal of the same name by Strobl, who also serves as a military consultant. Strobl, who recently retired after serving 24 years in the US Marine Corps, developed the original story with the strong support of Phelp's parents, John Phelps and Gretchen Mack.

What a great movie to watch for Memorial Day.

This film is heart wrenching. As it tugs on the heart strings, it fills you with hope and pride. I highly recommend this film. 5/5
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 05:24 PM   #2716
SquidPuppet SquidPuppet is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Club Loop
277
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfdude12 View Post
I understand this perspective, but this may say more about Squids (healthy, might I add) anti-perdo bias than about the film itself. It is what it is. I'll admit that my anti-perdo alarm didn't go off. I guess the facts of the film made the camera direction realistic: 16 year old dude in a thong + 17 year old chick in a prep school uniform (who has likely been repressed anything beyond a PG film to this point) = LOTSA LOOKIN My underlying reaction was "yeah, that would be happening (the frequent looks)" rather than "these directors are ___ ", I guess it all comes down to whether you think its plausible, and if so, I can't see the directors being culpable in any way for showing it (or using artistic style to show the intensity of it). [



Actually, I think I only touched the surface. As Ebert said, the film isn't so much about
[Show spoiler]the actual events depicted, but about miscommunication, and how willing are we as humans to go outside our comfort zone to communicate with another, in an effort to connect. This is a very powerful theme. It happens everyday, not just on a Walkabout. Some rich dude refuses to step outside his comfort zone, and sit down and talk to a homeless guy for an hour, to communicate with him. Same with racial barriers, language barriers, etc. It explains why as you pointed out earlier, why the kids weren't upset when they saw the aborigine dead (actually they were disturbed somewhat: the boy offered him something, but didn't understand death, and girl wipes ants from his chest), why the mating dance wasn't answered, and the haunting scene of the aborigine watching the girl cry with the photo. I think we both overestimated how much they had connected with him. In fact, the girl just saw the aborigine as a means to help them survive, nothing more, because she wasn't willing to go outside her comfort zone in an effort to communicate on a meaningful level. The boy tried somewhat, but not to any significant extent, which is why both he and her weren't emotionally moved when they saw him dead. The aborigine is guilty too, as it cost him his life. Theoretically, he could have put forth the effort and figured out that all he needed to do was say "wanna fu*k?" All they knew is what they knew, based on their lack of communication. Remember that they just saw him doing this crazy dance, and wouldn't come out of the house, they didn't know if he was going to kill him, they thought he'd gone loopy. All of this explains the lack of emotion when he was dead. It matters not that he "saved" them, as in their minds he'd gone nuts. Plus, he was merely a "hunting guide" of sorts to them, not a friend or buddy, because of the lack of communication




Again, I think this may say more about your astuteness than the film itself. I didn't have that reaction.
[Show spoiler] some of those flashbacks were great, I thought, such as the butcher knife and the aborigine cutting the kill: MAN HASN'T CHANGED, as Ebert put it. Without those cuts, I wouldn't have seen it. Perhaps you're complaining that they were excessive, and that's a possibility, but overall I loved the direction/cinematography




yeah still not sure on this, i'll have to watch it again.



Great point here Squid! Ebert made a great point on this:
[Show spoiler] at the beginning, the girl and bro are in the pool at the house, the Dad is upstairs in the kitchen, walks out and looks down at them, the wife is detached from him and we can eerily sense that something is off with this family. We only know what we know. The dad was an alcoholic (I think?) so their may be a history of abuse (especially if he just starts shooting at them). Honestly, would you be upset if you were those kids? They did discuss something about the dads death later on, I think, but it was brief, and I agree that their demeneor was unusually calm. I'll give you that. But I guess everyone responds to trauma differently, and we don't know what this dad's history is with them. What we do know is he shot at them, so I'll confidently assume that he's done much worse to them in the past when he's drank. Regarding the aborigine boy, as discussed above, you hit the nail on the head here: they were detached, and this is the point of the film! I'm sensing that you are rating the film based on your rating of the characters? Or the plausibility of the characters? or both? To me, their reaction to the aborigine underscores the unwillingness to communicate, and hence it just highlights the main theme. But I can understand if you go the route of deducting from the film b/c you don't think the characters actions were plausible, despite the miscommunication. To me, I just don't know what's plausible, as I'm not them.




No clue, I think they are just another
[Show spoiler] prop/example of the white man's presence, or rather the varied presence of the white man (profiting off statutes, sending out weather balloons) and how this is vastly dissimilar from the timeless unchanging culture of the aborigine. great contrast




LOL! I love this post. Again, this may just show how you
[Show spoiler] (very appropriately, might I add) are pretty strict that everything must pass "plausibility muster." I do it too, but tend to be less rigid than you I believe (for better or worse). A 17 y.o chick and 10? year old kid backtracking the tire tracks? hmmm, I'd give that a 50-50 shot. Now if it was a 17 year old boy...


But overall, I loved the film, even more so after reading Ebert's review (which I don't recommend people do until after they've seen the film). I understand your points about it and share many, but the themes overpower them.
Yes. The boys sexual curiousity about the girl was totally natural. And her sexual curiousity about him was fine as well. Her staring, and his... pretty normal at that age and nothing wrong with it. It was the many shots the were not from eithers perspective that I felt were gratuitous. Like the swimming scene. Although it was beautifully shot, the boy was nowhere around and, well, she was way underage when that was filmed. Who was that scene for? The viewer or the filmmaker.

I have rethought the swimming scenes meaning and effectivenes and have changed my mind. Although I still think it could have been handled without the nudity.
[Show spoiler]The boy was killing so many animals it made me think it was excessive. But now I see it as part of his effort to win her over. It was his way of proving he was worthy because he was a good provider. He was just going ape shit to do a good job.


Thanks for all your other thoughts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 05:30 PM   #2717
blooded predator blooded predator is offline
Senior Member
 
blooded predator's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
reno,nv
34
1
Default

Last one I watched was prince of Persia I give it a solid 4/5 thought it was a great flick acting storey was all pretty solid. Great scenery all n all a real solid movie recommend to everyone
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 05:34 PM   #2718
SquidPuppet SquidPuppet is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
SquidPuppet's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Club Loop
277
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhiggy23 View Post
Btw, Squiddy, I'm 40 minutes into Triangle and on the edge of my seat.
And............................?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 07:03 PM   #2719
surfdude12 surfdude12 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
surfdude12's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Club Loop
343
112
1
Default

Rear Window

Film: 5/5
-this film is solidly stuck in my top 10.
-my fourth viewing in 4 months (friends come over and haven't seen it, so I pop it in) and I still am 110% entertained!!
-Grace Kelly = god
-greatest moment:
[Show spoiler] Stewart answers the phone "Doyle, get over here, Thorwold is on the move!!!!!" [long pause] [Stewart holds out phone and looks at it]
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2010, 07:27 PM   #2720
serpheus serpheus is offline
Senior Member
 
serpheus's Avatar
 
Mar 2010
Rep of Ireland
88
Default

I was watching the Dirty Harry sequel Magnum Force on tv late last night and it is a very poor film.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Movies

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
What movie have you watched the most ??? Movies BLUE MYSTIC RAIN 822 02-04-2023 01:21 PM
The Most Boring Movie You Ever Watched Movies Blu Man 3990 10-11-2022 10:18 AM
What Blu-ray Are You Watching Or Just Watched? Give a Mini Review Blu-ray Movies - North America slick1ru2 30 01-24-2010 07:09 PM
Official Rate The Last Movie You've Seen Thread Movies _Bolt_ 10 11-29-2008 03:28 AM
User Review Rate Down Trolls Feedback Forum Grant Matrix 1 10-30-2008 04:34 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:42 AM.