As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
15 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Creator 4K (Blu-ray)
$20.07
6 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Thunderbolts* 4K (Blu-ray)
$45.21
41 min ago
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
8 hrs ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Home Theater > Home Theater General Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2007, 06:42 AM   #1
gvortex7 gvortex7 is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
gvortex7's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Fort Lauderdale, FL
18
105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawknelson05 View Post
well, if they all cost exactly the same personally i would go with the room. My family nor I have ever had surround sound so I can live without it. So thats MY opinion
They don't all cost the same, but they all have the same significance.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 06:45 AM   #2
Hawknelson05 Hawknelson05 is offline
Banned
 
Hawknelson05's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Gainesville
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvortex7 View Post
They don't all cost the same, but they all have the same significance.
I think he's trying to make hypothetical situations, thus my hypothetical answer. Obviously a room is significantly more expensive than a receiver and speakers
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 06:46 AM   #3
gvortex7 gvortex7 is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
gvortex7's Avatar
 
Jan 2007
Fort Lauderdale, FL
18
105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawknelson05 View Post
I think he's trying to make hypothetical situations, thus my hypothetical answer. Obviously a room is significantly more expensive than a receiver and speakers
I guess I meant speakers and receivers to be more specific.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 06:47 AM   #4
JadedRaverLA JadedRaverLA is offline
Power Member
 
Apr 2007
2
Default

The good room hands down. Though it's sadly the one item that most of us will never be able to actually get. It can be incredibly expense and usually impractical or impossible to make the room acoustics perfect, but when they are, it's bliss.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 07:00 AM   #5
Hawknelson05 Hawknelson05 is offline
Banned
 
Hawknelson05's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Gainesville
1
Default

i dont see where this is going
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 02:01 PM   #6
bootman bootman is offline
Special Member
 
bootman's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
The Burghs
Default

You have to bundle room and speakers unless you are spending huge money on sound treatments.

That said, the list would be:

1) Speakers (in your room)
2) electronics to drive them. (receivers, amps, preamps, etc)


No speakers will sound the same in a demo room and in your house unless both rooms are the same.

Great speakers can sound bad in the wrong room.
Mediocre speakers can good in the right room. (ever heard a Bose demo in their room?)
Bad speakers are just bad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2007, 02:24 PM   #7
The Guardian The Guardian is offline
Expert Member
 
The Guardian's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Kitchener, ON
9
1
Default

I have to disagree with putting speakers ahead of the "source".

Assuming you are getting HDMI into your receiver with the codecs bitstreamed, the receiver is the "source".

Let's say you bought insanely good speakers... $25,000 each. And hooked it up to the Onkyo 605 that everyone around here loves. It would sound like crap. Why? Because the speakers are so good you can hear the flaws in the sound from the receiver. Ok, that's an extreme example, but it illustrates the point.

An example of putting your money in the source... I was at a home theater show a few years ago, PSB Speakers was having a blind listening test. They had some speakers hidden behind a thin black sheet so the sound could come through but you couldn't see the speaker. They played some music and asked people to guess how much these (I believe brand new) speakers cost. The average was about $5000 on the guesses I believe.

In reality, they were PSB Alpha's, at $199 per pair. http://www.psbspeakers.com/products/...ha-LR1-Monitor

The secret? They had an amazing source, the source system was about $10,000 I think.

The moral of the story... a great source and amp can get great sound out of almost any speaker.

As for the room - you usually can't do much about it... and the newer receivers can partially compensate for it I believe.

P.S. I have nothing against Onkyo, just used it as a popular example.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Home Theater > Home Theater General Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Tweaking is very important LCD TVs franklinpross 1 06-14-2009 06:16 PM
Just How Important is HDMI 1.3 Home Theater General Discussion brett_day 5 03-23-2009 08:14 AM
Which is more important? Honestly... Blu-ray Movies - North America FilmMaster 37 10-15-2008 03:08 PM
Which Is Most Important To You? PS3 Cordre69 29 03-04-2008 04:13 PM
Is PiP that important? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology TheTenth 24 10-17-2007 03:00 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:21 PM.