|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $11.99 | ![]() $8.99 | ![]() $17.99 | ![]() $9.55 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $9.37 | ![]() $19.78 | ![]() $8.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
I see why director and DPs choose the shaky hand-held cam, but in the case of Transformers, it's done for a couple of reasons that I think is "cheating". For one, it actually makes it easier in post production for compositing purposes because the 3D animated objects don't have to interact with the surrounding environment perfectly, like feet touching the ground (ground is part of the film plate, but characters are animated). Things can be cheated and still work. Second, it's supposed to make us, as an audience, feel like we're in the action. Fine. But if we're too close, I'll get sick and not know what's going on. I like to be put into the action, but I AM watching the movie as an audience. I don't need to be right under Optimus Prime's crotch. And I don't mind being in the action as long as I can still tell what's going on. A combination of shaky cam and short lenses equals cheap, cheap and, oh yeah, cheap. I definitely don't think shaky cam + 3D is a very good idea. Especially if it's native 2D and not shot with 3D in mind. Directors are learning very quickly that shooting for 3D is a very different technique than shooting for 2D. Moreso than working with the various aspect ratios (including IMAX). They even have to consider how long they hold their shots and the transition between shots. This is why 3D animated (CG) films lend themselves well to 3D viewing. EVERYTHING can be controlled. I'm definitely skipping Clash of the Titans in 3D. It's gonna be 2D BD rental for me. Last edited by ckenisell; 08-29-2010 at 04:05 AM. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|