Another way High-Def Digest is biased towards HD DUD: Delayed reviews for bad HD DUDs

[richard lichtenfelt]

Read my original post. I said he is belittling the blu-ray uncompressed audio advantage. I didn't say he was attacking blu-ray.
His articles just seem to me to always coincide with blu-ray talking points, and his stand time and again is to marginalize those differences.
Maybe I'm wrong. I'm not on the offensive here. I was just adding my opinion to the others.

[Alan Gordon]

Originally Posted by richard lichtenfelt

Read my original post. I said he is belittling the blu-ray uncompressed audio advantage. I didn't say he was attacking blu-ray.
His articles just seem to me to always coincide with blu-ray talking points, and his stand time and again is to marginalize those differences.
Maybe I'm wrong. I'm not on the offensive here. I was just adding my opinion to the others.

I usually can't stand his articles due to the COMPLETE bias shown in them... but I always have fun reading them, because I can usually get a good chuckle from it... but I felt this article was lacking his usual bias, was very professional and informative.

~Alan