Quote:
Originally Posted by Another_Dude
What does an Oscar matter if the material is shown to be lies? The Academy doesn't seek to reward truth in journalism.
What is "any documentary or whatever u never what is actually the truth so that can be a dime a dozen" supposed to mean? A documentary should be something that "documents" an event, person, place, etc. When a film maker has a clear bias and manipulates the footage away from the truth to prove their preconceived point it is no longer a documentary, even if the Academy still pats themselves on the back because they awarded a little gold statue.
|
Dude u sound upset like u know Michael Moore. All I am saying is even in documentaries things can be docked and edited just as u have said about this peticular documentary. If this is true about Michael's movie then thats fine but I never heard anything about it. I still thought it was a great documentary nonetheless. Got Em!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricJ
(Um, we've just learned to accept Czar's ramblings as just the colorful blather of the Guy At the Back, like the stoner equivalent of Walter Matthau in "Earthquake"...Don't work too hard at the English translations.) 
|
Dude u have nerve. U and your random arse post with sentences talking in 3rd person etc....U need to kill that noise man.

Got Em!!