|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $49.99 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.44 1 hr ago
| ![]() $34.96 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 1 day ago
| ![]() $80.68 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $19.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 | ![]() $32.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $39.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $37.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#127 | |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() Quote:
damn-- is is possible to get a good video release of this flick??? As far as I know-- it's never happened.... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#128 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#129 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Reporting back after watching most of this movie now, the PQ is decent and considering I have not watched the Alliance version I can't compare the two. Clarity and details can be good at times and then other times you know they could have done a better job with a full restoration. The film does feel a bit too dark, even in scenes with decent amount of lighting. I am not too happy that they went with the DTS-HD 2.0 on this release, but it does have a lot of punch to it.......just sucks knowing how good this would have sounded with a 5.1 mix.
For $10, this is worth picking up and I do not regret the purchase as this is light years ahead of the DVD release which is very murky looking and non anamorphic. I am just going to place this in a BD multicase with the DVD version just for the extras. I am guilty of liking films in 1.78 and 1.85 aspect ratios, but it does piss me off when they don't stick with the OAR. Last edited by CaptainZombie; 04-05-2011 at 11:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#131 |
Member
|
![]()
How sure are we in the cropping of the film?
Someone posted on the AVS Forums (and is backed by the movie's IMDB page) that H20 was shot in Super 35, meaning the image was cropped to widescreen for theatrical showings, but could be shown on 4:3 TV sets in full screen with added image at the top and bottom and very slight cropping on the sides. If that's the case, then I assume the movie was filmed with the added image a 16:9 television set would offer in mind and could be technically seen as its official aspect ratio as well, as weird as that sounds. If so, I'll have to sleep on whether or not to cancel my pre-order. However, if the Echo Bridge release is truly cropped at the sides, I'm canceling it and purchasing the Alliance release. |
![]() |
![]() |
#132 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#133 |
Member
|
![]()
I understand that reasoning, but if the movie was made and filmed with both ARs in mind aren't they technically meant to be seen either way?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#135 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#136 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#137 |
Expert Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#138 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Opening up the matte on 2.35:1 films is quickly becoming the new "fool screen". I'd say 95% of films show on HD channels are open matte, and it's a damn shame too. Even though they show a lot of crap movies, Showtime's HD channels at least broadcast them in their OAR. *golf clap
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|