As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
7 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
1 day ago
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
8 hrs ago
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
Undisputed 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
28 min ago
Daiei Gothic: Japanese Ghost Stories Vol. 2 (Blu-ray)
$47.99
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Creepshow 2 4K (Blu-ray)
$32.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
1 day ago
The Terminator 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.44
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2011, 04:55 PM   #61
little flower little flower is offline
Senior Member
 
little flower's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
484
Default

I pre-ordered this last night. I got a free rental copy of the movie on 'Amazon Instant Video' since I pre-ordered the Blu-ray. I can watch the free rental copy right now.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 05:08 PM   #62
The Duke The Duke is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
May 2009
Wild Wild West
2
246
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yojoeski View Post
If the UK version is only one disc, then why is the UK getting the movie on one disc and the US is getting it split? The pics we've seen of the US UCE clearly show 3 discs and 2 of the discs say "1959 Part 1" and "1959 Part 2".
Well, Amazon UK is listing it as 1 disc, but any Amazon spec is questionable, so I'll should just call it "movie only, non fluff" release.

Where are you seeing a pic of the discs that say Part 1 & part 2? The pics in the listing here shows 3 discs all labeled Ben Hur, but are not large enough that I can see anything more. The movie is 212 minutes, borderline for fitting on on 50GB disc with decent bitrate and not overly compressed.

Last edited by The Duke; 06-09-2011 at 05:13 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 05:19 PM   #63
AeroK AeroK is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
AeroK's Avatar
 
Dec 2009
DFW TX
106
1178
168
771
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crow2k5 View Post
I pre ordered it, this will be a blind buy for me.
I envy you. Chariot race=
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 05:26 PM   #64
yojoeski yojoeski is offline
Senior Member
 
yojoeski's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
609
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
Well, Amazon UK is listing it as 1 disc, but any Amazon spec is questionable, so I'll should just call it "movie only, non fluff" release.

Where are you seeing a pic of the discs that say Part 1 & part 2? The pics in the listing here shows 3 discs all labeled Ben Hur, but are not large enough that I can see anything more. The movie is 212 minutes, borderline for fitting on on 50GB disc with decent bitrate and not overly compressed.
Go to its page and where it says "front" and "back" click on back and it will show a clear picture of the UCE's contents as well as the discs themselves which the labels are easily readable.

And no, this release isn't borderline for fitting on one disc. There is no excuse for this being on 2 discs but you can bet Warner will do it to simply raise the price that much more. Seven Samurai is only 6 minutes shorter and it looks spectacular on one disc and with Ben Hur being in it's 2.75 aspect ratio, there will be even more black area in the frame which uses less space for compression.

Last edited by yojoeski; 06-09-2011 at 05:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 05:50 PM   #65
The Duke The Duke is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
May 2009
Wild Wild West
2
246
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yojoeski View Post
Go to its page and where it says "front" and "back" click on back and it will show a clear picture of the UCE's contents as well as the discs themselves which the labels are easily readable.
Gotcha, I see it now. Thanks.

Quote:
And no, this release isn't borderline for fitting on one disc. There is no excuse for this being on 2 discs but you can bet Warner will do it to simply raise the price that much more. Seven Samurai is only 6 minutes shorter and it looks spectacular on one disc and with Ben Hur being in it's 2.75 aspect ratio, there will be even more black area in the frame which uses less space for compression.
Well, I'd rather see them do it right and give it plenty of room to breathe rather than like some of their previous mediocre releases of shorter movies squeezed on to a 25GB disc, or longer movies squeezed on to 1 50GB disc. And, at this point we don't know both discs are 50GB. Actually, if they do a separate transfer and put the UK release on 1 50GB disc and the US on 2 50GB discs, I'd have to reconsider buying the UK release-but that is highly unlikely, Warner likes to do one transfer and use it worldwide.

And I am glad to see they're using 3 BDs, I'm so sick of their releases with the movie on blu-ray and everything else on DVD. I'm not buying the LOTR EE until I can buy the movies on blu-ray by themselves, without all those extra features on DVD that I've already bought once.

Last edited by The Duke; 06-09-2011 at 05:56 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 06:09 PM   #66
ZoetMB ZoetMB is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
May 2009
New York
172
27
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yojoeski View Post
Go to its page and where it says "front" and "back" click on back and it will show a clear picture of the UCE's contents as well as the discs themselves which the labels are easily readable.

And no, this release isn't borderline for fitting on one disc. There is no excuse for this being on 2 discs but you can bet Warner will do it to simply raise the price that much more. Seven Samurai is only 6 minutes shorter and it looks spectacular on one disc and with Ben Hur being in it's 2.75 aspect ratio, there will be even more black area in the frame which uses less space for compression.
It's not just time, it's the level of detail and the difference from pixel to pixel both within one frame and between one frame and the next frame. AFAIK, color films generally take up more room than black and white films. A crowd shot in the arena will take up lots of room because almost every pixel is different.

Studios do not place movies on two discs to raise the price, especially on a release that has lots of physical extras and special packaging, which raises the price anyway. If it weren't on two discs, than everyone would be complaining that Warner sacrificed the quality to squeeze it onto one to save costs.

If you wonder why studios ignore sites like this one, it's because eventually, even the well-meaning production people there figure they can't win. No matter what they do, people complain. I can tell you from experience in a similar circumstance that it becomes depressing. This is why truly innovative companies like Apple never do focus groups and never ask people what they want. They just go out and produce the best products they know how to make.

I know it's really hard for a couch potato to stand up after two hours, walk over to the BD player and switch discs, but they should exert their muscles and try so they don't turn into that human character in Wall-E. I doubt most of the people complaining about this actually go all 222 minutes without a bathroom or snack break anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 07:00 PM   #67
Douglas R Douglas R is offline
Expert Member
 
Sep 2008
London, UK
197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
And I'm sure Warner loves you for thinking that way and wishes more folks would think like you. I think the price is an insult and a rip-off. Throw in a couple bucks worth of junk and inflate the price 3x? Shakes head and pre-orders the movie only UK release.
I love these big box sets and I don't consider books to be "junk" - that sort of printed material is expensive to produce. Of course, I appreciate that many people would sooner just have the film at a cheaper price but these classic films clearly do not sell in huge numbers and if the only way to make them profitable is to release them as a box set, then that makes perfect business sense.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 07:25 PM   #68
rickah88 rickah88 is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
rickah88's Avatar
 
May 2010
Columbia, MD
-
-
-
93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
It's not just time, it's the level of detail and the difference from pixel to pixel both within one frame and between one frame and the next frame. AFAIK, color films generally take up more room than black and white films. A crowd shot in the arena will take up lots of room because almost every pixel is different.

Studios do not place movies on two discs to raise the price, especially on a release that has lots of physical extras and special packaging, which raises the price anyway. If it weren't on two discs, than everyone would be complaining that Warner sacrificed the quality to squeeze it onto one to save costs.

If you wonder why studios ignore sites like this one, it's because eventually, even the well-meaning production people there figure they can't win. No matter what they do, people complain. I can tell you from experience in a similar circumstance that it becomes depressing. This is why truly innovative companies like Apple never do focus groups and never ask people what they want. They just go out and produce the best products they know how to make.

I know it's really hard for a couch potato to stand up after two hours, walk over to the BD player and switch discs, but they should exert their muscles and try so they don't turn into that human character in Wall-E. I doubt most of the people complaining about this actually go all 222 minutes without a bathroom or snack break anyway.
What is that saying:
"You can please SOME of the people ALL of the time, or ALL of the people SOME of the time".
or maybe it was just simply: Damned if you do, Damned if you don't ;-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 07:31 PM   #69
RBBrittain RBBrittain is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
RBBrittain's Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Little Rock, AR
762
1865
93
989
349
56
5
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yojoeski View Post
Go to its page and where it says "front" and "back" click on back and it will show a clear picture of the UCE's contents as well as the discs themselves which the labels are easily readable.

And no, this release isn't borderline for fitting on one disc. There is no excuse for this being on 2 discs but you can bet Warner will do it to simply raise the price that much more. Seven Samurai is only 6 minutes shorter and it looks spectacular on one disc and with Ben Hur being in it's 2.75 aspect ratio, there will be even more black area in the frame which uses less space for compression.
With 2 of the 3 discs devoted to the main film and one to the special features, we're back to it being odds-on that the 1925 silent version is still in SD. Even it they put it in HD alongside the 1959 film on its two discs, they would mention both versions; instead they say "1959 Part 1" and "1959 Part 2".

I still suspect the UK version will contain all 3 discs without the swag (just like GWTW), since the description there says "Ultimate Collector's Edition" but the price is way too low to cover the swag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 07:52 PM   #70
retablo retablo is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2007
Hollywood
1307
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
And I'm sure Warner loves you for thinking that way and wishes more folks would think like you. I think the price is an insult and a rip-off. Throw in a couple bucks worth of junk and inflate the price 3x? Shakes head and pre-orders the movie only UK release.

[/threadcrap]
My apologies. Had to say it, but I'll only say it once.
Good thing you can import then, that way you don't have to keep complaining about your OPINION.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 08:26 PM   #71
rickah88 rickah88 is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
rickah88's Avatar
 
May 2010
Columbia, MD
-
-
-
93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Duke View Post
And I'm sure Warner loves you for thinking that way and wishes more folks would think like you. I think the price is an insult and a rip-off. Throw in a couple bucks worth of junk and inflate the price 3x? Shakes head and pre-orders the movie only UK release.

[/threadcrap]
My apologies. Had to say it, but I'll only say it once.
Does that same logic apply to:
A BMW vs. Toyota Camry
A 5br house vs. a 4br house
Rolex vs. Timex

The list goes on and on, but I'm sure you get the point. What's wrong with someone liking the UCE? I know I'm looking forward to it! Furthermore it's not like it's a doubledip, as this is the first time Ben-Hur has been released on BD. Clearly you're not a 'bells & whistles' kinda guy.
I think $45(could even be less by release) is a great price for everything included. Considering that most 'big hit', or new theatrical release BDs go for $19.99...you're paying a little more than double and you get a great assortment of items. I wish more movies got this sort of treatment.
Hell I'd crap myself if Escape From New York got all this stuff. But that's just me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 08:37 PM   #72
Strevlac Strevlac is offline
Special Member
 
Dec 2010
506
207
5
Default

I don't mind the concept of a box set I just wish so many of these weren't rectangular. I much prefer the route WB went with Citizen Kane (aside from the fact that it's a DVD box set with a bluray thrown in). I want to be able to store these in a bookshelf normally without stacking it on top like some kind of dorky shrine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 09:10 PM   #73
rexinnih rexinnih is offline
Special Member
 
Apr 2008
Pacific NW
333
618
3
259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
It's not just time, it's the level of detail and the difference from pixel to pixel both within one frame and between one frame and the next frame. AFAIK, color films generally take up more room than black and white films. A crowd shot in the arena will take up lots of room because almost every pixel is different.

Studios do not place movies on two discs to raise the price, especially on a release that has lots of physical extras and special packaging, which raises the price anyway. If it weren't on two discs, than everyone would be complaining that Warner sacrificed the quality to squeeze it onto one to save costs.

If you wonder why studios ignore sites like this one, it's because eventually, even the well-meaning production people there figure they can't win. No matter what they do, people complain. I can tell you from experience in a similar circumstance that it becomes depressing. This is why truly innovative companies like Apple never do focus groups and never ask people what they want. They just go out and produce the best products they know how to make.

I know it's really hard for a couch potato to stand up after two hours, walk over to the BD player and switch discs, but they should exert their muscles and try so they don't turn into that human character in Wall-E. I doubt most of the people complaining about this actually go all 222 minutes without a bathroom or snack break anyway.
Wait a minute. The truth has no reason to be on the Internet!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2011, 09:20 PM   #74
The Duke The Duke is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
May 2009
Wild Wild West
2
246
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickah88 View Post
Does that same logic apply to:
A BMW vs. Toyota Camry
A 5br house vs. a 4br house
Rolex vs. Timex

The list goes on and on, but I'm sure you get the point. What's wrong with someone liking the UCE? I know I'm looking forward to it! Furthermore it's not like it's a doubledip, as this is the first time Ben-Hur has been released on BD.
Absolutely nothing wrong liking the UCE. When I said "shakes head" I meant I don't get the attraction and they're not for me, never intended it as a put-down against folks who appreciate them. The world would be a very boring place if we all thought alike and I'm glad other folks like things I don't, and just as happy I like things that others don't.

Quote:
Clearly you're not a 'bells & whistles' kinda guy.
I think $45(could even be less by release) is a great price for everything included. Considering that most 'big hit', or new theatrical release BDs go for $19.99...you're paying a little more than double and you get a great assortment of items. I wish more movies got this sort of treatment.
Hell I'd crap myself if Escape From New York got all this stuff. But that's just me.
I am a bells & whistles kind of guy, in areas that I care about. For a blu-ray, it's the PQ & AQ. I have no use for a big pretty box and assorted trinkets inside. But I hope you enjoy them, I'll just enjoy the movie.

Quote:
Originally Posted by retablo View Post
Good thing you can import then, that way you don't have to keep complaining about your OPINION.
You quoted my first post in the thread, and I've never posted in any other UCE threads, so your "keep complaining" rings a little hollow.

Last edited by The Duke; 06-09-2011 at 09:26 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2011, 01:11 AM   #75
Constitution 101 Constitution 101 is offline
Power Member
 
Constitution 101's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
65
257
12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickah88 View Post
Does that same logic apply to:
A BMW vs. Toyota Camry
A 5br house vs. a 4br house
Rolex vs. Timex

The list goes on and on, but I'm sure you get the point. What's wrong with someone liking the UCE? I know I'm looking forward to it! Furthermore it's not like it's a doubledip, as this is the first time Ben-Hur has been released on BD. Clearly you're not a 'bells & whistles' kinda guy.
I think $45(could even be less by release) is a great price for everything included. Considering that most 'big hit', or new theatrical release BDs go for $19.99...you're paying a little more than double and you get a great assortment of items. I wish more movies got this sort of treatment.
Hell I'd crap myself if Escape From New York got all this stuff. But that's just me.
Thank you for bringing some common-sense economics to the "studios are ripping us off" crowd.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 03:15 AM   #76
Boob-Ray Boob-Ray is offline
Senior Member
 
Boob-Ray's Avatar
 
Nov 2010
8
463
Default

There's sound logic to both sides. Some people want a UCE of some films / others don't. And they should offer a cheaper version to satisfy both camps and get more happy customers.

This is one UCE that I do want. Ben Hur and Gone With the Wind represent the grandest of the grandest of Hollywood's grandest. Certain sets, I feel warrant the giddy splurge - and that's my logic. But it shouldn't be the only option - and it probably won't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB
AFAIK, color films generally take up more room than black and white films.
I'm positive that that's true.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 01:42 PM   #77
rickah88 rickah88 is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
rickah88's Avatar
 
May 2010
Columbia, MD
-
-
-
93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boob-Ray View Post
There's sound logic to both sides. Some people want a UCE of some films / others don't. And they should offer a cheaper version to satisfy both camps and get more happy customers.

This is one UCE that I do want. Ben Hur and Gone With the Wind represent the grandest of the grandest of Hollywood's grandest. Certain sets, I feel warrant the giddy splurge - and that's my logic. But it shouldn't be the only option - and it probably won't.
You hit the nail on the head. I, like you, have been looking forward to this UCE for a long time. As I do with several other films that are among my favorites. Overall though I like when the studio presents the consumer with options: standard movie(lower cost), UCE(higher cost)!
Like anything else in life having options can always be viewed as a good thing!
Obviously from the studio's POV, they will roll out the UCE first, see how that sells then come out with a movie only version(a-la Gone With the Wind, Wizard of Oz, & Sound of Music)
So at the very worst, fans of Ben-Hur that don't want to spend on the UCE would have to wait a little while longer for the scaled down version. A shame, but that's just the way business(especially movie business) has always been conducted.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 02:43 PM   #78
thelwig14 thelwig14 is online now
Blu-ray Guru
 
thelwig14's Avatar
 
May 2011
Texas
94
Default

Are we still holding out hope for a disc only release at Target or Best Buy? Or is it big box or bust?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 03:09 PM   #79
The Duke The Duke is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
May 2009
Wild Wild West
2
246
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelwig14 View Post
Are we still holding out hope for a disc only release at Target or Best Buy? Or is it big box or bust?
Well, the US release doesn't even have a release date yet but the UK movie only release has a date of Sept. 5, so the US will likely release around then. So that's pretty far out for there to be any details of a non-UCE retailer exclusive. Walmart's non-digibook exclusive of The Outlaw Josey Wales was completely stealth - no one knew anything about it until it showed up on shelves on release day this week. Long story short - yes, we're still holding out hope.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2011, 07:08 PM   #80
KubrickFan KubrickFan is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
KubrickFan's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
319
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickah88 View Post
You hit the nail on the head. I, like you, have been looking forward to this UCE for a long time. As I do with several other films that are among my favorites. Overall though I like when the studio presents the consumer with options: standard movie(lower cost), UCE(higher cost)!
Like anything else in life having options can always be viewed as a good thing!
Obviously from the studio's POV, they will roll out the UCE first, see how that sells then come out with a movie only version(a-la Gone With the Wind, Wizard of Oz, & Sound of Music)
So at the very worst, fans of Ben-Hur that don't want to spend on the UCE would have to wait a little while longer for the scaled down version. A shame, but that's just the way business(especially movie business) has always been conducted.
Or just import it from the UK. That's what I don't get. All of those releases were available as discs-only releases in Europe from the start, and yet people in the US would rather wait until it's given a release there .
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:50 PM.